NeilWatson

Yes, heavy rain.

Not sure where you are thinking of, but that’s definitely not Peterborough! There’s a Harvester near the Showground entrance - no KFC, Pizza Hut or pub at the track car park!

Your post completely misunderstands the process of random drug testing in speedway.

No, in particular circumstances depending where the absent riders are: SR12.4 If a rider is representing their FMN in an FIM/FIME or National Speedway Championship, irrespective of the rider’s MA, a choice of G or RR facility is available.

In certain circumstances a team could be made up of seven guests!

No….. https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-peterborough-evening-telegraph/20171207/283330407653362

We still speak almost every day, I’ll mention it ……

A Promoter’s licence relates to a specific Club and appointment; and I have neither of those at the moment.

It wouldn’t. Ged was clear that we would continue to race in the second tier if no sale took place.

https://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/sport/other-sport/shock-resignation-at-peterborough-panthers-as-co-promoter-bemoans-a-lack-of-support-and-enthusiasm-4210664

Having a No 8 wouldn’t have changed that situation (unless he’d taken the RR in Heat 1 of course).

That would be fine. A long trek for Ben from Ipswich tonight ......

The 8-day rule only applies to guest appearances, not appearances for your own team, so a Poole rider could guest for Scunthorpe this Friday then ride for Poole next Friday.

Forced to, or accepted a booking to?

Connor King’s new average was effective from 1st June according to the GSAs

Agreed, but what was the reason given on the medical certificate?

The minimum ride rule (three rides, not four) doesn’t apply if a rider is withdrawn through injury, which is presumably the case here. IRR doesn’t apply to reserves. Updates, while a valuable resource, are not an official record of a meeting.

PETERBOROUGH can confirm that next Monday’s (June 5) scheduled home meeting against Wolverhampton has been postponed. We have been working closely with the stadium over availability issues and supporters who were present for the Bank Holiday meeting against Leicester will be aware that a major event is due to take place involving use of the infield and facilities. We would like to thank our landlords for working with us to enable that meeting to take place; however, it is unfortunately not possible for us to stage next Monday’s meeting. A new date for Wolves to visit will be confirmed, and the next home meeting is on Monday June 26 when the Crendon Panthers take on Belle Vue.

The ruling is SR10.5.p which states “ [A team may utilise a facility to cover the absence of a rider(s) who -] has been approved in a teams declared 1-7 at the start of the season but due to extenuating circumstances is not available, a facility may be granted, up to a maximum of 28 days, at the SCB Co-Ordinators discretion.” There’s a detailed explanation at http://www.wolverhampton-speedway.com/news.php?extend.3672

For a single rider change, the new rider’s average could of course exceed that of the replaced rider should the team be under the points limit.

This was a local derby fixture on a Bank Holiday, with three Grand Prix riders in the line-up, and you think the meeting was abandoned based on guesswork? No Promoter would willingly lose such a plum fixture.

Ben Trigger rides for Mildenhall in the NDL

All three riders had 32210, each beat one of the others, I believe that the tie was broken by the lowest GP number

Adam Ellis has an established PL average for 2023 (6.75 effective 1st April) which takes precedence over any CL average from previous seasons.

No - a guest takes the average and position of the rider he replaces.