eric i 610 Posted July 28, 2007 On plant speedway there were talks of only having 2 leagues next year with the wealthier PL clubs joining the EL. I think this would work if they also did the following…. 1.Only let riders ride in two countries, so there would be less use of rider replacement and guests. 2.Reduce the points limit in both leagues, so teams would be more even. 3.Set the admission prices for all clubs in the EL to £12 adults and PL to £10 adults. The leagues would probably look like this. Elite league 1. Poole 2. Coventry 3. Belle Vue 4. Arena Essex 5. Eastbourne 6. Ipswich 7. Wolverhampton 8. Peterborough 9. Reading 10. Swindon 11. Birmingham 12. Kings Lynn 13. Oxford 14. Sheffield 15. Stoke 16. Rye House Premier League 1. Workington 2. Glasgow 3. Edinburgh 4. Berwick 5. Newcastle 6. Redcar 7. Mildenhall 8. Somerset 9. Sittingbourne 10. Plymouth 11. Scunthorpe 12. Weymouth 13. Newport 14. Isle of Wight 15. Buxton 16. Exeter (hopefully Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
father jack 31 Posted July 28, 2007 I don't think Stoke, Oxford, Birmingham, Sheffield, are keen on Elite Leauge, and there doubts about Reading. As for Pl, I dont think Sittingbourne and Buxton could afford it not sure about Plymouth and Weymouth. All clubs an the UK have to complete at a level thats viable for them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
em1500uk 190 Posted July 28, 2007 I didn't think King's Lynn were too keen on EL either, but maybe that's changed I know where I'd rather be though... I was told Plymouth had put in a bid to join the PL, but that maybe hearsay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eric i 610 Posted July 28, 2007 Stoke, Oxford, Birmingham, Sheffield and kings Lynn may change there mind with a lowered points limit. If it was around 38 or 36 then they would only need to change about 3 riders. This goes for Sittingbourne and Buxton in the PL they would only need to change about 3 or 4 riders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MARK246 243 Posted July 28, 2007 Of the tracks listed for the EL, IMO only four would be classed as certain to run next season, Coventry,Poole,Wolves and Swindon the rest I think will have problems maintaining the level of team required.In sport in the UK in general there is a decline in attendance. It will need promoters with deep pockets to cover loses incured by the lower clubs. The only way to encourage PL teams to go up? and the other EL teams to stay is to reduce wage bills.This would mean removing costly GP stars and then you have a weaker league, (not so Elite any more) but maybe getting a more even spread of the remaining talent. Effectivly this takes us back to the one big league that was tried before but with smaller costs. The only other altenative is a smaller EL consisting of eight teams running an A and B series. Quite why a PL club would risk financial security to join a dying league is beyond me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
em1500uk 190 Posted July 28, 2007 Quite why a PL club would risk financial security to join a dying league is beyond me. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> My thoughts exactly! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
star ghost 7 Posted July 29, 2007 And, if I am not mistaken, the Kings Lynn promotion think this way also Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
25yearfan 476 Posted July 29, 2007 If it was done properly, EG the fair distribution of riders then it could work for most teams but; I'm afraid Buxton and Sittingbourne struggle to afford CL so most definately couldn't run at an even higher level. Also finishing the CL would most probably mean the end of one of its stronger better run clubs in Boston who don't have a track of their own and don't get regular good crowds at KL. So looking at these points it is far better to continue with 3 leagues - but trying to make the EL more interesting and viable. With Exeter hopefully returing, Oxford likely to revert to PL, Scunthorpe set to move up with Plymouth thinking about it, as well as strong murmouring from 2 former big league teams who could have new stadiums then their would be scope for 3-4 of the better PL tracks to move up without hurting the PL number wise! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eric i 610 Posted July 29, 2007 The only way to encourage PL teams to go up? and the other EL teams to stay is to reduce wage bills.This would mean removing costly GP stars and then you have a weaker league, (not so Elite any more) but maybe getting a more even spread of the remaining talent. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> There would be less wage bills if they only let riders ride in two countries therefore a lot of the GP star would ride in sweden and Poland. If the points limit was lowered, teams wouldn't have many top expensive riders.This would mean the league would be alot weaker and the name might need to be changed from elite to 1st division. There might need to be a third division of 8 teams in which teams like Buxton, Sittingbourne and Weymouth could be in. There would also be teams from the current CL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Smith 5,645 Posted July 29, 2007 Jonny Chapman did say on the centre concrete that King's Lynn will strongly consider riding the top league if next season's BIG CHANGES come off and there will be some BIG CHANGES. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Meynell 2 Posted July 29, 2007 (edited) I'm afraid Buxton and Sittingbourne struggle to afford CL so most definately couldn't run at an even higher level. Also finishing the CL would most probably mean the end of one of its stronger better run clubs in Boston who don't have a track of their own and don't get regular good crowds at KL. I guess you could still run a third division for second teams, or teams without tracks of their own. Exceptionally you could allow marginal standalone tracks such as Buxton and Sittingbourne to join as well. Even without Buxton, Sittingbourne and Boston, there could still be two leagues of 14 and 15 tracks respectively (16 if Exeter returned). Edited July 29, 2007 by Kevin Meynell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matousek 0 Posted July 29, 2007 Jonny Chapman did say on the centre concrete that King's Lynn will strongly consider riding the top league if next season's BIG CHANGES come off and there will be some BIG CHANGES. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> hmm wonder what these changes would entail Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Meynell 2 Posted July 29, 2007 There would be less wage bills if they only let riders ride in two countries therefore a lot of the GP star would ride in sweden and Poland. They would take some sort of international agreement, and I doubt that will happen. However, there's no doubt the Elite League needs to cut costs, so some of the top riders will have to go. the name might need to be changed from elite to 1st division. Elite and Premier are silly meaningless superlatives anyway. I can understand why you might not want to use Division 1 and 2 when they're effectively separate leagues, but what's wrong with 'League One' and 'League Two', or even 'British League' and 'National League'? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matousek 0 Posted July 29, 2007 does any have the link where i may be able to read about this, cheers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Meynell 2 Posted July 29, 2007 hmm wonder what these changes would entail I'd imagine it would entail running the BEL (or top league) at a level closer to the BPL. Perhaps something akin to the level of the BPL circa 1995/96. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites