Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Recommended Posts

 

Until we get an independent adjudicator (or, as Proud Potter suggested, a panel) to make judgements on disputes and issues and create a body of binding case law this simply won't go away.

 

We all know it makes sense, the fact that the powers that be don't do it makes me suspicious!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We all know it makes sense, the fact that the powers that be don't do it makes me suspicious!

You don't get turkeys voting for Christmas .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't get turkeys voting for Christmas .

Another good win today Paulco! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another good win today Paulco! ;)

Today was a struggle . But one of the type of wins that win you the title . It could have very easily been points dropped today .

Now what to expect from my speedway team tomorrow :shock::D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today was a struggle . But one of the type of wins that win you the title . It could have very easily been points dropped today .

Now what to expect from my speedway team tomorrow :shock::D

Fingers crossed for a double!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they started it at 3, there'd still be people complaining about that (like the crowd of alcoholics that need a few hours in the pub 1st :rolleyes:)

Anyone in mind? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone in mind? ;)

 

Not a clue :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So...are riders on assessed averages eligible? And does someone have to do a specific number of meetings for a club?

 

As it stands, Stoke's top 3 are Frank Facher (Assessed 7, ridden 3 meetings) Jeremia Thelaus (Assessed 7, 1 meeting ridden) and Ben Wilson (Average 6.3, ridden 2 meetings) If they have a minimum number of meetings needed, we would end up with Taylor Poole riding in the meeting! With the greatest respect to Facher, Thelaus and Wilson, I would much rather Poole be there, as he is someone who has been with us all year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on which club or league he they race in, Take N Glanz for instance who was allowed to race and win in the NL best pairs after racing 2 or 3 meetings for Plymouth but in the PL you had to race 8, No rule was voted on at the AGM, The MC introduced the 8 match rule for the first time this season to ensure that J Screen couldnt race ! Agree that Taylor Poole should get the nod rather than a new rider Stoke have just signed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If other teams are not sending their number ones, then I would like to see Kim Nilsson go for Newport.

 

Dropped just 1 point from 5 outings in the league match there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If other teams are not sending their number ones, then I would like to see Kim Nilsson go for Newport.

..............depending on his availability?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If other teams are not sending their number ones, then I would like to see Kim Nilsson go for Newport.

 

Dropped just 1 point from 5 outings in the league match there.

 

Agreed, and I think if Kim stays with us next year then he will definately get in the PLRC, I think he will be that number 1 so many was expecting this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good post Halifax tiger......dont think theres a fan in the land who would disagree with a panel as suggested. but it won't happen- will it?

 

Totally agree Halifaxtiger. Your dead right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy