Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
TonyMac

Bruce Penhall

Recommended Posts

Penhall has been retired years and now there is a big debate amazing really.I see quite alot of Penhall, he was a big talent no doubt about it i wasnt a fan because i was a big Scott Autrey supporter so it took me a while to like him.I have always maintained if he had hung around,Nielsen and Gundersen would not have won as many titles.As for being flogged today,that is laughable god he would have a field day in the elite league now.But forget the speedway Bruce is taking a bit of stick for taking a different route in life his decision i think he secretly wishes he hadnt.All in all Bruce was good for speedway,and speedway was good to Bruce.On another point i enjoyed Rod Haynes articles as well and i hope there are more in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Penhall has been retired years and now there is a big debate amazing really.I see quite alot of Penhall, he was a big talent no doubt about it i wasnt a fan because i was a big Scott Autrey supporter so it took me a while to like him.I have always maintained if he had hung around,Nielsen and Gundersen would not have won as many titles.As for being flogged today,that is laughable god he would have a field day in the elite league now.But forget the speedway Bruce is taking a bit of stick for taking a different route in life his decision i think he secretly wishes he hadnt.All in all Bruce was good for speedway,and speedway was good to Bruce.On another point i enjoyed Rod Haynes articles as well and i hope there are more in the future.

 

But he didn't sidney - did he - he decided to shaft Speedway, it's Management and it's Supporters. Unforgivable in my book. He treated the Sport that made him what he was like dirt. :angry:

 

A terrific Rider, yes - not sure about the 'man' though. :angry:

 

I must admit that I really enjoyed Rod Haynes Articles too. :approve:

Edited by The White Knight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But he didn't sidney - did he - he decided to shaft Speedway, it's Management and it's Supporters. Unforgivable in my book. He treated the Sport that made him what he was like dirt. :angry:

 

A terrific Rider, yes - not sure about the 'man' though. :angry:

 

I must admit that I really enjoyed Rod Haynes Articles too. :approve:

But he didn't sidney - did he - he decided to shaft Speedway, it's Management and it's Supporters. Unforgivable in my book. He treated the Sport that made him what he was like dirt. :angry:

 

A terrific Rider, yes - not sure about the 'man' though. :angry:

 

I must admit that I really enjoyed Rod Haynes Articles too. :approve:

I No where you are coming from White Knight,and after he went Lee Olsen Mauger Sigalos Sanders [ect] i had a bit of a downer on speedway.Penhall leaving did leave a massive void because i would say speedway was in pretty good shape at the time.I suppose i was silly anough to think speedway would just go on as normal.But since then things have slipped, but i can see why you feel like you do as you feel Penhall betrayed speedway which i cant totally disagree with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tbh, I can't see why people are so anti-Penhall.

 

Ok, i could understand if:

a) you were a Cradley fan bitter about him costing you the '82 BL title

B) you were a Carter fan who, despite video evidence to the contrary, believe Carter was robbered in '82

c) You had a few quid on Penhall to win the 82 Overseas final

 

Otherwise, I think the sentiments are pretty irrational. To me, he is one of the all time great riders. I'd have much rather he'd stayed in speedway, where I think he would have continued to win world titles,but understand why he made the choice he did, and think he has to be admired for then becoming a World Champion in another sport.

For those who doubt him as a person, hopefully something like this shows that he is at least not all bad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tbh, I can't see why people are so anti-Penhall.

 

Ok, i could understand if:

a) you were a Cradley fan bitter about him costing you the '82 BL title

B) you were a Carter fan who, despite video evidence to the contrary, believe Carter was robbered in '82

c) You had a few quid on Penhall to win the 82 Overseas final

 

Otherwise, I think the sentiments are pretty irrational. To me, he is one of the all time great riders. I'd have much rather he'd stayed in speedway, where I think he would have continued to win world titles,but understand why he made the choice he did, and think he has to be admired for then becoming a World Champion in another sport.

For those who doubt him as a person, hopefully something like this shows that he is at least not all bad

What is your opinion? i no it is hyphophetical, if Penhall had stuck around would Nielsen and Gundersen won as many titles between them? Also for me Lee[self destructed] sigalos injury ankle? Sanders/ Carter went they were for me the threats along with Jonsson Ermolenko to challenge the danes domination up until 1990. What do you think?Saying all that Nielsen and Gundersen were great riders. But people forget Penhall for that reason that he had a massive bearing on the history of the roll of honour.Do i think Penhall had the measure long term over Nielsen and Gundersen yes i do and more titles would of followed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Penhall would have won more titles. Not in 83, I don’t think any rider would have beaten Egon that day (though if anyone could , it would have been Bruce- and perhaps there would have been a difference to egon’s psychology if Bruce had been in the field, as it was there was no strong favourite, and egon must have thought “this is mine for the taking.”).

I reckon he’d have won two more in the 80s, with Erik and Hans perhaps winning two apiece. Lee certainly could have won more if his career had stayed on track, Sanders I don’t think would have done, Carter and Sigalos perhaps.

 

That said, I think you have to bear in mind that Nielsen in particular was nowhere near his peak when Penhall and Lee were at their peak - so its not surprising that Penhall had a great head to head record against Nielsen. Penhall (81 version) , Lee (late 70s version), Nielsen (86-89 version) - all great riders, very, very little between them, in my view - but I think you'd have to say Penhall and Nielsen would have a slight edge over Lee, simply for their consistency. At their peaks, I'd take Penhall to beat Hans in a one-off final, Hans to beat Penhall in a GP series.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the 1980's were a stange time for international speedway with loads of english fans supporting the yanks or the danes. whatever peoples views on kenny carter at least he was patriotic. as for bruce penhall, his antics at the white city in 1982 were blatant and unprofessional and finished his golden boy image with a lot of fans. i remember the incident like it was yesterday and the boos and the objects being thrown at him made it unforgettable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Penhall would have won more titles. Not in 83, I don’t think any rider would have beaten Egon that day (though if anyone could , it would have been Bruce- and perhaps there would have been a difference to egon’s psychology if Bruce had been in the field, as it was there was no strong favourite, and egon must have thought “this is mine for the taking.”).

I reckon he’d have won two more in the 80s, with Erik and Hans perhaps winning two apiece. Lee certainly could have won more if his career had stayed on track, Sanders I don’t think would have done, Carter and Sigalos perhaps.

 

That said, I think you have to bear in mind that Nielsen in particular was nowhere near his peak when Penhall and Lee were at their peak - so its not surprising that Penhall had a great head to head record against Nielsen. Penhall (81 version) , Lee (late 70s version), Nielsen (86-89 version) - all great riders, very, very little between them, in my view - but I think you'd have to say Penhall and Nielsen would have a slight edge over Lee, simply for their consistency. At their peaks, I'd take Penhall to beat Hans in a one-off final, Hans to beat Penhall in a GP series.

II think you summed things up spot on , i went in 83, and was confident Lee could win it was flying at Halifax the week before murdered Carter in the helmet.But on the day Muller was awesome did feel Sanders should of been tougher when he gated him but we all no Muller was a top class alround motorcyclist.But Lee did cram alot in his career in a short space of time 75to 83 six finals third twice fourth once and a winner a pretty good record i suppose.And to think he was really only 25 when his top class career was finished in 83.Nielsen since he has retired if you study his record he did have a terrific career, the impressive thing the longevity of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Penhall would have won more titles. Not in 83, I don’t think any rider would have beaten Egon that day (though if anyone could , it would have been Bruce- and perhaps there would have been a difference to egon’s psychology if Bruce had been in the field, as it was there was no strong favourite, and egon must have thought “this is mine for the taking.”).

I reckon he’d have won two more in the 80s, with Erik and Hans perhaps winning two apiece. Lee certainly could have won more if his career had stayed on track, Sanders I don’t think would have done, Carter and Sigalos perhaps.

 

That said, I think you have to bear in mind that Nielsen in particular was nowhere near his peak when Penhall and Lee were at their peak - so its not surprising that Penhall had a great head to head record against Nielsen. Penhall (81 version) , Lee (late 70s version), Nielsen (86-89 version) - all great riders, very, very little between them, in my view - but I think you'd have to say Penhall and Nielsen would have a slight edge over Lee, simply for their consistency. At their peaks, I'd take Penhall to beat Hans in a one-off final, Hans to beat Penhall in a GP series.

Very well made arguments :t: Would have fancied Billy to win overall in the course of a GP complete series. Edited by Roland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very well made arguments :t: Would have fancied Billy to win overall in the course of a GP complete series.

Why? What big meetings did he ever win to prove that line of argument?

Edited by falcace

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the 1980's were a stange time for international speedway with loads of english fans supporting the yanks or the danes. whatever peoples views on kenny carter at least he was patriotic. as for bruce penhall, his antics at the white city in 1982 were blatant and unprofessional and finished his golden boy image with a lot of fans. i remember the incident like it was yesterday and the boos and the objects being thrown at him made it unforgettable.

interesting that you praise Carter for being patriotic, yet condemn Penhall for putting his compatriots first (surely the very definition of partiotism). Can't imagine Carter EVER giving up a title for the benefit of fellow Englishman.

Yes it was blatant, but how often do we criticize our sportspoeple for lack of honesty - he could easliy (and probably should have) just faked an engine failure. I'm not sure he should be criticized for being open about what he was doing (and let's face it, many others have done the same).

 

 

Very well made arguments :t: Would have fancied Billy to win overall in the course of a GP complete series.

Have to disagree to be honest, Billy probably performed above himself in world Finals, but can't think of a year I would actually have expected him to finish on the podium in a GP series. Perhaps 83, but as falcace points out, he didn't win any big individual meetings (though he did almost win the world pairs single handedly for the Aussies).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But he didn't sidney - did he - he decided to shaft Speedway, it's Management and it's Supporters. Unforgivable in my book. He treated the Sport that made him what he was like dirt. :angry:

 

A terrific Rider, yes - not sure about the 'man' though. :angry:

 

I must admit that I really enjoyed Rod Haynes Articles too. :approve:

 

I don't understand that viewpoint really Ian. He didn't want to race anymore, for whatever reason, are you suggesting that a rider must put in a season or two of mediocrity before he is allowed to retire. Okay the way he renaged on the last 2 months of the season didn't do Cradley any favours but I believe Penhall was starting to have thoughts of self preservation, he didn't want to get hurt, and with or without Hollywood I doubt he would have gone on much longer, doubtful he would have done even another season in my view.

 

As for Billy Sanders, Billy was good in 1983 but with Billy desperation had took over by then, lots of riders want to be world champion and channel everything into achieving it but with Billy it went a lot further and I think that desperation was starting to affect him by then, the more he didn't win the worse it got. Desperate men rarely won world finals, cool calculated performance was usually the order of the day, with a bit of luck thrown in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy