Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
covlad459

Coventry 99 % Certain To Be In Elite Next Season Acording To Sandu

Recommended Posts

Actually Authorised is also heavily into Covs cause so I wouldn't take it as too much of a compliment. I fail to see how anyone can side with their stance.

Whether they feel unfairly treated or not you don't do something so stupid as to threaten legal action against someone you are trying to work with.

 

My boss is exactly the same as Sandhu. He is always threatening to take people to court if he doesn't get what he wants. He is loaded and it is embarrassing to hear him use this threat so often. I always hope that they call his bluff and take him to the cleaners.

 

You really are crazy aren't you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i certainly hope shovlar has got a shovel though, he's gonna need it.:approve:

 

So you keep saying.

Now, I'll put this simply and straightforward: put up; shut up.

Edited by Phil
warning , attack the post not the poster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Its only a guess but i suspect Bananaman isn't really a banana, Hyderd doesn't live on Hyde Road, Lady luck doesn't have much luck, Eastern Wolf probably doesn't blow houses down and Custer mouse doesn't live in a skirting board.

Do you realise the problems you have caused for the friends and families of these people now that you have shattered their delusions. Blimey, talk about telling children there is no Santa Claus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Simple fact: If you feel you aren't getting justice you challenge it. No matter what the situation.

 

Yes it's within freedom to challenge......although doesn't mean it's going to succeed.

 

In this case do you not feel Sandhu or whoever was representing Coventry made a huge error or are you succumbed to being un-Impartial?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's within freedom to challenge......although doesn't mean it's going to succeed.

 

In this case do you not feel Sandhu or whoever was representing Coventry made a huge error or are you succumbed to being un-Impartial?

 

Nobody knows yet do they? But it appears not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody knows yet do they? But it appears not.

 

Since I get the feeling you don't agree sounding by your posts, may I ask what you would do in the situation since your an ImpartialOne? :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you keep saying.

Now, I'll put this simply and straightforward: put up; shut up.

 

 

you know something. you are right. you're luck is bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you know something. you are right. you're luck is bad.

 

 

Naughty, naughty Colin, don't taunt, maybe we should all be waiting a little more patiently, ahem, nudge ;)

Seasons greetings, Martin :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why should clubs get to vote on 1 8pt rider per team when certain clubs don't have any as assets over 8

Been out all day, so missed this when it came up, but this is a key point, I think. How can you make a rule which penalises someone with an asset base? All it means is that clubs who own more than 8+ rider will not be able to use their assets, and in fact will be forced to release them other clubs - their direct rivals. Also, they would be perfectly within their rights to demand a full transfer fee for those riders - are Eastbourne, Belle Vue, Kings Lynn & Birmingham going to pay those fees? Yes, it's a poor situation when half the league doesn't have enough riders of the required quality to form a team, but punishing those that do is backwards and unfair.

 

EDIT: Is this how the assets stack up? Forgive me if I've got any wrong...

 

Belle Vue: None

Birmingham: None

Coventry: Harris, Nicholls

Eastbourne: None

Kings Lynn: None

Lakeside: Richardson (Shields)

Peterborough: Andersen, Bjerre (Iversen, Batchelor)

Poole: Holder, Kasprzak (Pedersen, Watt)

Swindon: Zagar (Stead)

Wolverhampton: Lindgren (Woffinden)

 

(extended to include 7+ pointers)

Edited by alan_boon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been out all day, so missed this when it came up, but this is a key point, I think. How can you make a rule which penalises someone with an asset base? All it means is that clubs who own more than 8+ rider will not be able to use their assets, and in fact will be forced to release them other clubs - their direct rivals. Also, they would be perfectly within their rights to demand a full transfer fee for those riders - are Eastbourne, Belle Vue, Kings Lynn & Birmingham going to pay those fees? Yes, it's a poor situation when half the league doesn't have enough riders of the required quality to form a team, but punishing those that do is backwards and unfair.

 

I disagree, as usual. I think it opens up the league so that the have don't "have it" all their own way. Teams with rich owners can just buy up the top riders and dominate the league for years. the one over 8 rule stops this happening and the sport is better for it, without any doubt at all.

 

Coventry are trying to have Harris and Hans in their lineup, which is against the rules voted in at the AGM. Do you think that is fair when Belle Vue can't get a number one?

 

Do you think it is fair that Coventry have two number ones yet every other club abides by the rules and only has one, or none?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think that is fair when Belle Vue can't get a number one?

Can Belle Vue afford a number one?

 

EDIT: Just to say, I don't necessarily think it's a bad rule, especially under such a low points limit, but the matter still remains that it's unfair.

Edited by alan_boon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since I get the feeling you don't agree sounding by your posts, may I ask what you would do in the situation since your an ImpartialOne? :wink:

 

you may.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy