Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Nutz

Track Records

Recommended Posts

I know the King's Lynn track record wont be broken untill some serious dirt is put down. The only time i can remember anyone coming close was in the sheffield play off meeting in 2007, when the track was doctored to suit lynn riders and it was way to deep most riders couldn't handle it except for Tomas Topinka who missed the track record by about 0.1 of a second. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Said from behind a keyboard with 3,000posts + to his name...

Wrong on both accounts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried this once, having been looking for the information myself, but the records changed so often I couldn't keep up. Good luck with it, Nutz, it's a handy resource to have. :)

 

If one of the mods could make it a Sticky, then it'd be a bit easier to update I think - Making it a little like the "confirmed signings" thread that runs prior to the season...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Todd Kurtz new NL track record of 59.04 at Newport on 17/04/11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Todd Kurtz new NL track record of 59.04 at Newport on 17/04/11

 

Updated, Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the new Silencers slowing down the bikes slightly I would have thought a lot of the records will stand for a while ?

 

David Howe broke the Scunthorpe TR with the new silencer. Riders are getting up to speed with them and hitting the times they were hitting last year.

 

The average speed proves that Sheffield is by far the fastest track in Britain :approve:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

David Howe broke the Scunthorpe TR with the new silencer. Riders are getting up to speed with them and hitting the times they were hitting last year.

 

The average speed proves that Sheffield is by far the fastest track in Britain :approve:

By 1 and a half mph.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the average speed necessarily proves anything anyway, as the track length is measured round the kerb and doesn't take into account how far round the racing line is. For example as quick as Sheffield is I can't imagine that Peterborough is any slower in real terms as its also a flat out track.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clubs should really start recording them again with the new exhausts coming in this year, the current track records are doubtfully to be beaten again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clubs should really start recording them again with the new exhausts coming in this year, the current track records are doubtfully to be beaten again.

Coventry for one, used to have 2 track records listed (before the track changed, circa 1985) with one for old tyres and one for (then) new tyres.

 

A similar thing should be done for the silencers, although Scunthorpe's has already fallen.

 

I didn't mean to write Scumthorpe, honest!

Edited by ImpartialOne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the Belle Vue NL record by Jason Garrity on 23rd Mar '11 you've transposed the figures and put 63.2 instead of 62.3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By 1 and a half mph.

 

That's fast enough - it would make a massively huge difference in F1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fast enough - it would make a massively huge difference in F1.

It is also the difference between 1st and last in speedway, but however you look at it it is still only 1.5mph which is not a massive difference in speed, and in Formula 1 the percentage would be significantly less than it is in speedway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as the track length is measured round the kerb

No it isn't. It's measured on a racing line 1 metre out from the kerb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the Belle Vue NL record by Jason Garrity on 23rd Mar '11 you've transposed the figures and put 63.2 instead of 62.3

 

Really? Looking at the Belle Vue website, Jason recorded 63.2 in heat 4 which was the fastest that was recorded - However, some races don't have times against them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy