Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Midland Red

Speedway Gp In Tatters !

Recommended Posts

Not like you to appear on a thread supporting the wonderful job BSI/IMG do for the sport Philip. Perish the thought people do not share your view. I am entitled to my view as you are without it being rubbished.

 

No I am no GP fan, never have been and never will. The fact that its in such a mess now says it all for me, they seem to be struggling to persuade riders to take up a freebie gift to ride in it.

 

I totally accept others views that the GP is wonderful, just wondering who its wonderful for.

 

I do find it amazing how quick you are to defend the GP series on just about every thread that starts.

 

As for the comparison of FIFA taking money out of the World Cup, yes of course they do, but BSI are not the governing body, they are a commercial organisation who take money out of the sport adn in my opinion couldn't give a t*ss about the sport or the fans, my opinion that's all

 

IMO the FIM should be the ones making the money not some external organisation. Can you imagine FIFA allowing someone else to run the World Cup and keep a large slice of the proceeds. That is a far better comparison than the one you make

 

Perhaps Mr Rising's publication benefits from increased sales after each GP round !

 

However, I doubt that that is the real reason for his support of the GP series

 

But clearly there are factions outside of the sport who gain from the GP series and I do not see as a supporter of i) speedway and ii) my local team what success the GP series has brought to either

 

Please tell me as I handover my cash at the turnstile and programme kiosk at my local track how the GP series benefits i) the club and ii) me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Please tell me as I handover my cash at the turnstile and programme kiosk at my local track how the GP series benefits i) the club and ii) me

 

Would speedway still be around at it's current size if the GP's didn't attract the TV audience it does? The GP's have given speedway some incredible television exposure, which surely has some kind of effect on local gates? Perhaps your team could be dead and buried in the defunct section or you could be paying more for the privilege of watching your team with fewer friends. :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps Mr Rising's publication benefits from increased sales after each GP round !

 

However, I doubt that that is the real reason for his support of the GP series

 

But clearly there are factions outside of the sport who gain from the GP series and I do not see as a supporter of i) speedway and ii) my local team what success the GP series has brought to either

 

Please tell me as I handover my cash at the turnstile and programme kiosk at my local track how the GP series benefits i) the club and ii) me

 

 

SPEEDWAY Star's post-GP sales don't vary at all and as we add 16 pages to every edition the week after a GP (at a cost of around £1,600) it has no financial benefit.

 

I am a fan of the GP because I think through originally John Postlethwaite and now IMG the level of professionalism and presentation puts speedway's premier event on a par with any other sporting occasion.

 

It is impossible to equate some of the benefits of the SGP series right down to your local track but it is up to the BSPA and its members to do that. SVEMO use revenue gleaned from the SGP to filter down to invest at lower levels rather than reducing the cost of entry or the price of a programme which is what you appear to want.

 

There is no doubt that many young riders are attracted to speedway because of the SGP, they aspire to race on big occasions in big stadiums and on television around the world. It is these riders who eventually put bums on seats and help provide the revenue at tracks everywhere. Sadly that may not be as true in Britain as it is in many other countries but you cannot blame the SGP for that.

 

Of course IMG are in it to make money but they make huge investments in the SGP infrastructure and take a long term view which is something that was lacking in the past.

 

I make no apology about canvassing for the SGP because I see it as something speedway can be proud of rather than embarrassed about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SPEEDWAY Star's post-GP sales don't vary at all and as we add 16 pages to every edition the week after a GP (at a cost of around £1,600) it has no financial benefit.

 

I am a fan of the GP because I think through originally John Postlethwaite and now IMG the level of professionalism and presentation puts speedway's premier event on a par with any other sporting occasion.

 

It is impossible to equate some of the benefits of the SGP series right down to your local track but it is up to the BSPA and its members to do that. SVEMO use revenue gleaned from the SGP to filter down to invest at lower levels rather than reducing the cost of entry or the price of a programme which is what you appear to want.

 

There is no doubt that many young riders are attracted to speedway because of the SGP, they aspire to race on big occasions in big stadiums and on television around the world. It is these riders who eventually put bums on seats and help provide the revenue at tracks everywhere. Sadly that may not be as true in Britain as it is in many other countries but you cannot blame the SGP for that.

 

Of course IMG are in it to make money but they make huge investments in the SGP infrastructure and take a long term view which is something that was lacking in the past.

 

I make no apology about canvassing for the SGP because I see it as something speedway can be proud of rather than embarrassed about.

 

i think you mentioned the problem and the reason why nobody can see the benefits of money from the GP series like they can in sweden.

 

The BSPA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a fan of the GP because I think through originally John Postlethwaite and now IMG the level of professionalism and presentation puts speedway's premier event on a par with any other sporting occasion.

 

It is impossible to equate some of the benefits of the SGP series right down to your local track but it is up to the BSPA and its members to do that.

I agree with you.My first speedway meeting after a gap of about 7 years was a GP at Vojens.I have seen a number of posts here over the years mentioning it was the GPs that attracted them(back).It really takes the sport onto a new level.All those against it and wanting the old one off World Final i doubt would go to anything more than the Final that Britian held once every few years.I doubt we will see them travelling to Terenzano,Güstrow or Balakovo for a quali meeting.But it seems a lot of GP supporters will travel to a number of GPs every year and most seem to try to fit in one or two other meetings in around the trip.That benefits the local tracks as well as the GP organisation.One or two tracks around the time of Cardiff will also benefit from that,as well as danish tracks or Polish tracks at the time of their GPs.Scrap the GPs and this will all end to a large extent as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would speedway still be around at it's current size if the GP's didn't attract the TV audience it does? The GP's have given speedway some incredible television exposure, which surely has some kind of effect on local gates? Perhaps your team could be dead and buried in the defunct section or you could be paying more for the privilege of watching your team with fewer friends. :wink:

 

You are assuming that the effect on local gates is positive - perhaps it is negative as armchair viewers stay away from the local tracks, particularly bearing in mind the changes necessary to the regular pattern of race-nights to accommodate GPs (practice and event)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SPEEDWAY Star's post-GP sales don't vary at all and as we add 16 pages to every edition the week after a GP (at a cost of around £1,600) it has no financial benefit.

 

I am a fan of the GP because I think through originally John Postlethwaite and now IMG the level of professionalism and presentation puts speedway's premier event on a par with any other sporting occasion.

 

It is impossible to equate some of the benefits of the SGP series right down to your local track but it is up to the BSPA and its members to do that. SVEMO use revenue gleaned from the SGP to filter down to invest at lower levels rather than reducing the cost of entry or the price of a programme which is what you appear to want.

 

There is no doubt that many young riders are attracted to speedway because of the SGP, they aspire to race on big occasions in big stadiums and on television around the world. It is these riders who eventually put bums on seats and help provide the revenue at tracks everywhere. Sadly that may not be as true in Britain as it is in many other countries but you cannot blame the SGP for that.

 

Of course IMG are in it to make money but they make huge investments in the SGP infrastructure and take a long term view which is something that was lacking in the past.

 

I make no apology about canvassing for the SGP because I see it as something speedway can be proud of rather than embarrassed about.

 

 

Sorry Mr Rising, but

 

1 if you cannot equate the benefits, can you at least identify them ?

 

2 do you really believe there are MANY attracted to the sport because of the GP ?

 

Don't misunderstand me, I enjoy watching the GPs (at Cardiff and on TV) but in their present guise they are surely no longer worthy of creating a World Champion - a GP Champion, maybe - but with the 8 automatic qualifiers (from previous year's position), up to (by the look of things) 5 wildcards, the geographical disparity in the share-out of GP venues (how many in Poland???) surely they can only create a GP Champion, and there should be a World Championship Final as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I make no apology about canvassing for the SGP because I see it as something speedway can be proud of rather than embarrassed about.

 

I wholeheartedly agree.

 

Like lots of other retro products and nostalgic delights of the seventies and eighties I love to look back at those times. They were great. At the time.

 

But time has moved on. There is no going back.

 

The Grand Prix system (under BSI/IMG or their inevitable successors) is the present and future of world Class speedway. We need to make sure that is works. And works very well.

 

And I don't want to be too over-dramatic but this present situation with riders turning down places seems a bit of a crisis for me.

 

The system of the top eight from last year plus three Challenge qualifiers and four permanent wild cards seemed to be a good balance.

 

But that is now being dismantled not by the FIM, not by BSI but by the Polish league. And it's not in the interests of speedway or the World Championship at all, is it?

 

The indiviual wild card at each round may have helped some attendances and was useful for the appearence of Darcy and Thomas H. But beyond that, it was already a bit of a tired 'add-on'. Most of them are fairly ho-hopers.

We surely cannot cope with yet more 'one-offs' who offer nothing to the quest to be World Champion at all. An extra one, two or even five (!) meeting by meeting wild cards would just look silly, wouldn't it?

 

You've also got to wonder about some of the men in the middle ranking of the GP who take up their qualified place or wild card as offered and who are willing to forgoe the 'Polish Shilling' for World Championship hopes. How are they going to feel about the riders who have turned down guarenteed places to take the big money and then get the chance of coming back as 'guests' without all the attendant costs and trouble that the season-long guys have put up.

 

A little division in the ranks will occur, surely?

Edited by Grand Central

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact of the matter is, the GP system itself is not the one to blame here, its league racing that is treading on it's toes that is the problem

LOL, what a joke.

 

The issue BSI are going to have to address is the fact the riders don't really make that much money out of riding in GP's, of any 16 riders in a GP only 2 or 3 are genuine contenders, the rest spend large amounts of money to just make up the numbers. Maybe in the recession the riders who realistically will never be WC are questioning the worth of the investment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SPEEDWAY Star's post-GP sales don't vary at all and as we add 16 pages to every edition the week after a GP (at a cost of around £1,600) it has no financial benefit.

 

I am a fan of the GP because I think through originally John Postlethwaite and now IMG the level of professionalism and presentation puts speedway's premier event on a par with any other sporting occasion.

 

It is impossible to equate some of the benefits of the SGP series right down to your local track but it is up to the BSPA and its members to do that. SVEMO use revenue gleaned from the SGP to filter down to invest at lower levels rather than reducing the cost of entry or the price of a programme which is what you appear to want.

 

There is no doubt that many young riders are attracted to speedway because of the SGP, they aspire to race on big occasions in big stadiums and on television around the world. It is these riders who eventually put bums on seats and help provide the revenue at tracks everywhere. Sadly that may not be as true in Britain as it is in many other countries but you cannot blame the SGP for that.

 

Of course IMG are in it to make money but they make huge investments in the SGP infrastructure and take a long term view which is something that was lacking in the past.

 

I make no apology about canvassing for the SGP because I see it as something speedway can be proud of rather than embarrassed about.

 

i agree on most points. the bsi do a pretty good job but need to inprove in some areas, staff! and i dont mean you before you ask :lol:

 

people harp on about british speedway and what the sgp has done or or not done for it. i would say more it has proven more positive than negative to the uk.

 

reason british speedway is in its dieing state is. crap bspa, bent promoters, rubbish sadiums generally and really no idea were in 2011 and not 1950.

 

yes sgp not perfect by long way but uk speedway, pikey is maybe the word :rofl: just look at coventry now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Mr Rising, but

 

1 if you cannot equate the benefits, can you at least identify them ?

 

2 do you really believe there are MANY attracted to the sport because of the GP ?

 

YES ... very much so. Kids come into speedway (as with most sports) dreaming of becoming World Champion. Without that sort of aspiration they will get nowhere. Spend one second with Jason Crump and you will appreciate how the riders have become invigorated with the SGP because it provides them with a massive stage on which to perform.

 

Don't misunderstand me, I enjoy watching the GPs (at Cardiff and on TV) but in their present guise they are surely no longer worthy of creating a World Champion - a GP Champion, maybe - but with the 8 automatic qualifiers (from previous year's position), up to (by the look of things) 5 wildcards, the geographical disparity in the share-out of GP venues (how many in Poland???) surely they can only create a GP Champion, and there should be a World Championship Final as well

 

DON'T see it that way at all. No different to F1 or many other sports, not just the motorised variety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL, what a joke.

 

The issue BSI are going to have to address is the fact the riders don't really make that much money out of riding in GP's, of any 16 riders in a GP only 2 or 3 are genuine contenders, the rest spend large amounts of money to just make up the numbers. Maybe in the recession the riders who realistically will never be WC are questioning the worth of the investment.

 

YOU cannot judge rider income generated through the SGP by prize money alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We live in a commercial world. Do FIFA not make money out of the World Cup?

 

The fundamental difference is that FIFA is 'owned' by the national associations, which are in turn usually usually owned by the local clubs, leagues and associations. Although FIFA is quite clearly a corrupt organisation whose officers undoubtedly have their hands in the till, the point is that the organisation is still run by football for the benefit of football. Millions of pounds still find their way down to grassroots football, which is completely unlike what happens in speedway as far as anyone can determine.

 

Indeed, the ICC Cricket World Cup, IRB Rugby World Cup, and just about every other world cup going are primarily run for the benefit of their sports, not private companies. Yes, it's true that rights to particular events are often sold to private management companies for a guaranteed sum, but that's really not the same thing as the relationship between the FIM and IMG.

 

Of course IMG are in it to make money but they make huge investments in the SGP infrastructure and take a long term view which is something that was lacking in the past.

 

I'm sorry, but just what are these huge investments? I suppose the air fences and temporary tracks cost a bit, but they're not especially large in the grand scheme of things.

 

The stadiums already exist, and for most of the GPs, the local organisers does much of the work and takes the financial risk. I'd guess there are longer term agreements in place for GPs held like the Millenium Stadium and Parken, but I'd imagine most of the money isn't paid a long way up front for these venues and therefore nothing much is lost if IMG/BSI gets its sums wrong and goes bust.

 

BSI/IMG pay a considerable sum of money to the FIM (putting money back into the sport) that they wouldn't otherwise have

 

It's a reasonable argument that IMG/BSI have created wealth that the sport didn't have in the first place, but frankly I don't think they do anything so clever that the existing speedway authorities couldn't have done if they'd had any imagination. When you strip out the hype, they've not raised the profile of the sport much above what it was before, crowds are actually not much better than they were in the late-1980s and early-1990s when World Finals were still held in proper stadiums, the sport hasn't really got much beyond the same old countries, and the riders are still paid pretty much the same (low) amounts.

 

The fact that it's apparently seriously being suggested that the sport's premier event could end-up being a series of glorified open meetings because half of the qualified riders can't afford to ride in it anymore, absolutely sums up how far along BSI and IMG have taken the SGP... :rolleyes:

 

I don't blame BSI (and later IMG) for seeing a potential business opportunity, nor do I object to them making modest profits on the running of the competition. However, I do think the terms of their deal with the FIM are little short of scandalous and the sport as a whole is being short-changed regardless of its own incompetence. It's hardly any consolation that IMG seem to throw all the profits away on other ill-conceived ideas of theirs, as it's money that could and should be invested back in speedway.

 

The bottom line is though, I'd have much more sympathy for IMG/BSI profit making if they were actually paying the going rate for their performers. If the SGP was turned into a full-time circus as was suggested more than 10 years ago, and the best riders in the world were able to make a proper living on the back of it, then it would be much harder to have objections.

Edited by Humphrey Appleby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would speedway still be around at it's current size if the GP's didn't attract the TV audience it does? The GP's have given speedway some incredible television exposure, which surely has some kind of effect on local gates? Perhaps your team could be dead and buried in the defunct section or you could be paying more for the privilege of watching your team with fewer friends. :wink:

 

My team is dead and buried so it didn't help us very much :sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a fan of the GP because I think through originally John Postlethwaite and now IMG the level of professionalism and presentation puts speedway's premier event on a par with any other sporting occasion.

 

I suspect Reading Speedway are one that didn't benefit from this professionalism. He left them high and dry. Fuelled my view at the time that he and his organisation had no care for the sport

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy