Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Sign in to follow this  
June01

Nicki Or Chris?

Recommended Posts

That decision is a disgrace. How the hell can Holder stay in there????!!!!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That decision is a disgrace. How the hell can Holder stay in there????!!!!

 

If that was the other way round , there would only be one outcome !

 

Holder is very lucky indeed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That decision is a disgrace. How the hell can Holder stay in there????!!!!

 

People really need to watch the replays properly.

 

It's as clear as day in the Semi Final Pedersen came across Holder, contact was made which caused Holder to lift. All 4 was the only option, I can't for the life of me see how any other decision could have been made.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ref bottled it and decided the world title and they moan about that Polish ref!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IF, just IF Holder had shut off when Nicki leaned on him, would the referee have ruled an unsatisfactory start?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People really need to watch the replays properly.

 

It's as clear as day in the Semi Final Pedersen came across Holder, contact was made which caused Holder to lift. All 4 was the only option, I can't for the life of me see how any other decision could have been made.

 

WE HAVE watched the replies but its still Holder who failes to gate and hits Nicki twice, causing him to fall.

Holder caused the stoppage and should be x'd. No doubt what so ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People really need to watch the replays properly.

 

It's as clear as day in the Semi Final Pedersen came across Holder, contact was made which caused Holder to lift. All 4 was the only option, I can't for the life of me see how any other decision could have been made.

Yes, that's how I saw it. Nicki placed his front wheel on the kerb, and Holder was impeded, causing him to straighten up. Mr Ackroyd got it spot on on this occasion.
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Watch that from 2.26 to 2.30, what is Holder meant to do? If you shut off you stop turning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Watch that from 2.26 to 2.30, what is Holder meant to do? If you shut off you stop turning.

Exactly - if you shut off the stops spinning and you straighten up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's subjective. Everyone will always disagree on these matters as you can normally build a case for either rider depending on which side of the fence you sit on.

 

I thought it was very similar to the move Holder used on Bomber in the 2010 Grand Final and I would have excluded Chris for being the cause of the stoppage.

 

However, it's done now and adds towards a miserable 2012 season which will only get worse on the following two Monday's.

 

Congrats to the Polish Fast Chris Holder on becoming World Champ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly - if you shut off the stops spinning and you straighten up.

 

ONLY if you shut off ALL the way :approve:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Watch that from 2.26 to 2.30, what is Holder meant to do? If you shut off you stop turning.

Pedersen clearly clamped him and said so in his interview! As you say what was Holder meant to do, he had to turn ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taken from Noddys own website ....

 

Both Holder and Pedersen were up against each other in the second semi-final, and in a tight first bend, the Dane fell after being nudged off his bike by the Australian

 

Nudged him off his bike EXCLUSION :approve:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Watch that from 2.26 to 2.30, what is Holder meant to do? If you shut off you stop turning.

 

By lifting Holder did momentarily stop turning, that's why Pedersen came off. Stone-wall exclusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy