KP22 0 Posted July 24, 2014 I have had problems with bet 365 the last few days It started when I kept winning, repeatedly, every night I was doubling my money (only small stakes) but winning none the less They started to limit my bets Basically I opened my account with £100, I had since made 3x £300 withdrawels, and had a fairly healthy balance still in there The final straw for me was I had an accumulator bet on sunday for the SEC, I had rider match ups for Miedzinski to outscore Larsen, Kilderman to outscore Jonnsson and Ward to outscore Pedersen In my opinion my £25 treble won, but because Pedersen beat Ward in the final they said the bet lost even though ward scored 13 and nikki had 11 They refused to pay out, I said I would close my account and seek legal advice at which point they offered me £50 in the form of a bonus bet At that point I withdrew my balance, and played with their £50, I now have a balance of £165(all withdrawable) after cleaning up last night with 4 out of 4 winning bets poole -2 after 8 heats, poole -4 after 15 heats, ward to score 11+ and milik -3 v lambert bash the bookies, I hate them all If you had read there rules then u would see that they settled your bet fine based on there rules (and other companies have similar rules), see below. Sounds like u were treated more than fairly so I'd stop complaining!! Rider Match-Ups/Handicap Match-Ups (Grand Prix and Individual Fixtures) The above rule section applies if neither quoted rider in a match-up reaches the final. If one or both named drivers in a match-up reach the final, then settlement will be based on their respective finishing position in the final ride-offs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SCB 0 Posted July 24, 2014 You wouldn't get a treble in a single meeting, they're too closely linked. Also any bet on Ward in a SEC meeting will be a loser As for the 13 vs 11. The rules are clear it's points unless there's a final. It's annoying to lose out on technicalities but they can work for you sometimes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wiseguy 214 Posted July 24, 2014 You wouldn't get a treble in a single meeting, they're too closely linked. Also any bet on Ward in a SEC meeting will be a loser As for the 13 vs 11. The rules are clear it's points unless there's a final. It's annoying to lose out on technicalities but they can work for you sometimes. You wouldn't get a treble in a single meeting, they're too closely linked. Also any bet on Ward in a SEC meeting will be a loser As for the 13 vs 11. The rules are clear it's points unless there's a final. It's annoying to lose out on technicalities but they can work for you sometimes. sorry, i meant suyfutdinov, but i did bet a treble, and they partly paid out, after lots of emails Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
