gee jay 234 Posted November 19, 2015 i don't quite understand how people are talking about the brummies being potentially top heavy and then saying that they have the strongest reserve pairing in the league ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Islander15 1,065 Posted November 19, 2015 (edited) If the limit is still 36, how about Zach, Bacon, Bowtell and Hunter or Zach, Dugard, Bacon and Parker? Edited November 19, 2015 by Islander15 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ProudtobeaBrummie 646 Posted November 19, 2015 limit cant be 36 its impossible that is a fact .. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex2000 266 Posted November 19, 2015 i don't quite understand how people are talking about the brummies being potentially top heavy and then saying that they have the strongest reserve pairing in the league ? They have the only reserve pairing in the league at the moment... So of course they have the strongest. No one knows who will have the strongest yet! Eastbourne supposedly have a Finnish/British 3 pointer in the wings and Powell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ProudtobeaBrummie 646 Posted November 19, 2015 (edited) Zach - 9.51 bacon -4.42 Johnson -6.21 champman -5.18 perry -8.58 smith -3.00 jpb -3.00 total = 39.9 that team wins the league imo plenty of improvement there I dont know if brendan is in talks with anyone else he would be the awkward one to convince but apparently tom wants to ride closer to home so Birmingham is perfect especially as he goes well at PB as for zach he is a asset and loved by the fans and Sam has made no secret of hes desire to return to Birmingham for 2016... Edited November 19, 2015 by redandyellow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Islander15 1,065 Posted November 19, 2015 (edited) They have the only reserve pairing in the league at the moment... So of course they have the strongest. No one knows who will have the strongest yet! Eastbourne supposedly have a Finnish/British 3 pointer in the wings and PowellWho? limit cant be 36 its impossible that is a fact .. I don't think it'll stay that low, but its not impossible. Edited November 19, 2015 by Islander15 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex2000 266 Posted November 19, 2015 Who? I don't think it'll stay that low, but its not impossible. Not sure of his name but I think it was catinthehat said about him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sings4Speedway 3,247 Posted November 19, 2015 Zach - 9.51 bacon -4.42 Johnson -6.21 champman -5.18 perry -8.58 smith -3.00 jpb -3.00 total = 39.9 that team wins the league imo plenty of improvement there I dont know if brendan is in talks with anyone else he would be the awkward one to convince but apparently tom wants to ride closer to home so Birmingham is perfect especially as he goes well at PB as for zach he is a asset and loved by the fans and Sam has made no secret of hes desire to return to Birmingham for 2016... I think whoever gets the signature of Bacon for the up coming season will be in a very strong position. Bargain on his average and strongly suspect he wont be back at Mildenhall. I was suspecting Coventry as the most likely but Cradley / Brum are also strong possibilities. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex2000 266 Posted November 19, 2015 http://www.newmarketjournal.co.uk/sport/speedway/breaking-news-fen-tigers-rider-of-the-year-moves-on-1-7073852 Hmmm well that's a hard one to work out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
uk_martin 1,606 Posted November 19, 2015 limit cant be 36 its impossible that is a fact .. I'm confused by that too. In what other sport do you build a team to a combined strength that is not enough to be a winning combination? (Working on the basis that you have to exceed 39.00 to have a winning team?) Still, this is speedway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alan_Jones 1,005 Posted November 19, 2015 limit cant be 36 its impossible that is a fact .. No, what is a fact is that the limit could be anything from 21 upwards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ProudtobeaBrummie 646 Posted November 19, 2015 incorrect alan otherwise only 3 point riders would of been signed . you live in cloud cuckoo if you think the points limit remains the same Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alan_Jones 1,005 Posted November 19, 2015 incorrect alan otherwise only 3 point riders would of been signed . you live in cloud cuckoo if you think the points limit remains the same You seem to be struggling with the difference between fact and opinion. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ProudtobeaBrummie 646 Posted November 19, 2015 (edited) not at all alan do you really think people dont already know tut tut . Stick your head back in the sand Edited November 19, 2015 by redandyellow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alan_Jones 1,005 Posted November 19, 2015 not at all alan do you really think people dont already know tut tut . Stick your head back in the sand Thank you for confirming my point. Now explain to me why it is a fact that the limit can't be 36. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
