Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Steve Shovlar

Poole Sign Lindback

Recommended Posts

Has V.Milik been reassessed?

 

Who can tell.

It seems that 7 is the official line this month, it might be different next month.

Because it was 11 meetings. 6.34. Upped to 7.00.

Shame the BSPA didn't recognise it at the time.

It's about time they found some consistency to applying rules.

Hancock kept his old average 2014, AJ re-assessed to 9.03, whilst a rider much better than AJ this season is assessed 2 points lower, ditto Dudek.

That's a snap at the governing body, not any one club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it was 11 meetings. 6.34. Upped to 7.00.

Didn't you need to do 12 meetings then to get an average.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though the rules allowed Lindback's average to be reassesed, i don't see why it was? If his old average was 7.94 i'd say that's an acceptable averages & there is no reason to change it!


1.Magic=8.97

2.Kacper G=5.51

3.Kurtz=6.40

4.Vaclav Milik=5.67

5.Krzysztof Kasprzak= 7.91

6.J.Holder= 4.01

7.Adam Ellis= 4

 

42.47= total score. How about this team??? For next season.

How would Ellis be on a 4.00 average?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though the rules allowed Lindback's average to be reassesed, i don't see why it was? If his old average was 7.94 i'd say that's an acceptable averages & there is no reason to change it!

How would Ellis be on a 4.00 average?

Well they would have to give all EDR new averages probs from PL average it would mean that no English rider would get a spot on any team. Jack Holder for example is 4.01 for next season he is just behind Robert Lambert and well his average is 3 points lower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what formula is going to be used for edr riders in 2017, possibly pl averages which sees Newman in demand. Ellis doesn't ride pl so 3.00 sounds about fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.Magic=8.97

2.Kacper G=5.51

3.Kurtz=6.40

4.Vaclav Milik=5.67

5.Krzysztof Kasprzak= 7.91

6.J.Holder= 4.01

7.Adam Ellis= 4

 

42.47= total score. How about this team??? For next season.

Holder and lindback would be better than magic and Kurtz. Better than gomolski available on that average. If the limit is 42.5 then Elliis should be 2016 rolling average. And if EDR scheme dropped surely there will still be requirement for minimum 2 or 3 brits per team?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't believe edr should be dropped. Its starting to produce riders.

Edited by Steve Shovlar
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what formula is going to be used for edr riders in 2017, possibly pl averages which sees Newman in demand. Ellis doesn't ride pl so 3.00 sounds about fair.

Reckon you might catch a few with this one Mr Shovlar. ...
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what formula is going to be used for edr riders in 2017, possibly pl averages which sees Newman in demand. Ellis doesn't ride pl so 3.00 sounds about fair.

:rofl:

 

Comedy classic.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hancock wasn't 2 years ago, and AJ WAS (9.03) last year.

Tai kept his 7.03 this year but others on a 7.

 

Milik reassessed as a 7 tho, seems fair.

Ha ha, very good. But Milik rode for KL for a bit last year so can't have it reassessed :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to have not ridden here for at least 3 years to be re-assessed

downwards ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You've been biting for a few days, in honesty :)

 

 

Indeed he has :wink:

Edited by Poole Quay 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So how many people on this forum hopes this signing backfires spectacularly on Poole? Just hit "Like This" and we can all see. I'll start.

 

CHEATING SCUMBAGS!

They didn't and not much of a following, just 6. Another flop then? what a LOSER. :approve:

Edited by pugwash
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy