lucifer sam 3,953 Posted May 13, 2017 (edited) "Why stop the race"...because the rider behind was impeded - how many times in speedway do we say that wasn't fair, why not start it again and run it properly, if a rider's at fault he should pay ! As for 50/50 ...the rules are quite clear, if you impair another rider do to your own fault you have to take the consequences...its the same for everyone. Just take it on the chin and move on. But the rider behind (Danny King) ended up in front of Lewis Kerr, so why stop the race? It made no sense. And the rules aren't clear. Please show me where the word 'impair' is in the rulebook? Just who is the 'primary cause' in such a case? The rider who locks up? Or the rider who clatters into the back of another? It made absolutely no difference to the result of the meeting, but the ref ruined what was shaping up to be a cracking race. All the best Rob Edited May 13, 2017 by lucifer sam Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Arch Stanton 2,232 Posted May 15, 2017 (edited) Heat 9 Edited May 15, 2017 by Arch Stanton Share this post Link to post Share on other sites