foreverblue 6,091 Posted December 21, 2017 4 minutes ago, foamfence said: http://speedwaygp.com/news/article/6309/pooles-holder-talks-stall He says it isn't about money then in the next sentence says he needs to sell assets because he is losing 20 cent of turnover due to lack of tv money! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
james1234 49 Posted December 21, 2017 Just now, foreverblue said: He says it isn't about money then in the next sentence says he needs to sell assets because he is losing 20 cent of turnover due to lack of tv money! If truth was known it probably about Jack Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skidder1 7,634 Posted December 21, 2017 Well there's only Leicester, Belle Vue and Rye House as real possibilities!! Swindon and Wolves are complete. KL not really. Somerset can they afford him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foreverblue 6,091 Posted December 21, 2017 Just now, james1234 said: If truth was known it probably about Jack So basically he wants to go to Somerset but Matt Ford is saying he wants to sell not loan. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foreverblue 6,091 Posted December 21, 2017 Just now, Skidder1 said: Well there's only Leicester, Belle Vue and Rye House as real possibilities!! Swindon and Wolves are complete. KL not really. Somerset can they afford him? Can anyone afford him? I would think only Rye House could. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
james1234 49 Posted December 21, 2017 1 minute ago, foreverblue said: So basically he wants to go to Somerset but Matt Ford is saying he wants to sell not loan. It must be Somerset he wants to go to Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theblueboy 960 Posted December 21, 2017 1 minute ago, foreverblue said: So basically he wants to go to Somerset but Matt Ford is saying he wants to sell not loan. Well, unfortunately, Matt himself has set the bar on this one extremely low. In football we had the Bosman ruling. In speedway, its the Miedzinski. The fact Holder is in his plans for 2018 is neither here nor there. if they cant agree terms he is a free agent and the rule of Miedzinski should be enforced. 3 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bald Bloke 3,284 Posted December 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, foreverblue said: So basically he wants to go to Somerset but Matt Ford is saying he wants to sell not loan. Looks like that's the case.I can't see any club paying £25k for him as mentioned elsewhere.I doubt he has many years left over here and I don't think he's a rider that will still be riding into his late 30's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hyabb17 1,077 Posted December 21, 2017 1 minute ago, theblueboy said: Well, unfortunately, Matt himself has set the bar on this one extremely low. In football we had the Bosman ruling. In speedway, its the Miedzinski. The fact Holder is in his plans for 2018 is neither here nor there. if they cant agree terms he is a free agent and the rule of Miedzinski should be enforced. Couldn’t agree more, Swindon were stiffed in that a few years back. Swindon offered Miedzak a deal & couldn’t agree, joins Poole & a loan is the arrangement, the same rule should be applicable 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
james1234 49 Posted December 21, 2017 No one will buy him he will just refuse to ride for Poole, so MF may as well get a loan fee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skidder1 7,634 Posted December 21, 2017 8 minutes ago, theblueboy said: Well, unfortunately, Matt himself has set the bar on this one extremely low. In football we had the Bosman ruling. In speedway, its the Miedzinski. The fact Holder is in his plans for 2018 is neither here nor there. if they cant agree terms he is a free agent and the rule of Miedzinski should be enforced. But they have agreed financial terms - its about other stuff!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theblueboy 960 Posted December 21, 2017 Just now, Skidder1 said: But they have agreed financial terms - its about other stuff!! That's irrelevant. If Poole, cannot agree, for whatever reason, with Chris Holder to be in your team for 2018 that's Poole's problem, nobody else's. The problem is, you'll only be able to loan him out on a 7 pointers loan fee and not a number 1. That's a double whammy in my book... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BurntFaceMan 413 Posted December 21, 2017 36 minutes ago, foreverblue said: He says it isn't about money then in the next sentence says he needs to sell assets because he is losing 20 cent of turnover due to lack of tv money! He says the arrangement with Holder isn't about money. He didn't say he need's to sell his assets, he said that it looks like he be losing 20% of his turnover due to a lack of profitable TV deal and could look at selling assets. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baldyman 6,243 Posted December 21, 2017 I think it's a case of chris had already agreed to race for somerset with jack...as mentioned months ago...Matt has decided he wants to use him., chris has said no matt I'm racing for somerset. Matt throws toys out of pram and says....well they will have to buy you then. Chris says ...whatever matt...do what ya want but I'm not racing for you next year. Matt throws more toys out of pram and says.. Well can we at least make it look like I've tried to sign you in the press..as don't want people thinking I've lost my touch. 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lisa-colette 6,024 Posted December 21, 2017 37 minutes ago, hyabb17 said: Couldn’t agree more, Swindon were stiffed in that a few years back. Swindon offered Miedzak a deal & couldn’t agree, joins Poole & a loan is the arrangement, the same rule should be applicable Rules change every year! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
