Jump to content
Beat the Bookie GP prize competition 2024 Read more... ×
British Speedway Forum
Flappy

Peterborough Panthers 2018

Recommended Posts

Average conversion is 1.3, so both KK and Kennett are wrong, also KK on a Sunday?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thing is, Peterborough weren't the only team at the 4s not to use their top riders

And they also weren’t the only Championship team by a long way to run fixtures missing riders and with no facility.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kennett would be decent imo as he knows all of the tracks. It's that second heat leader position that's the issue.....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And they also werent the only Championship team by a long way to run fixtures missing riders and with no facility.

But were the only to grant permission - in the other cases the alternative fixtures had priority
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thing is, Peterborough weren't the only team at the 4s not to use their top riders

yeah, but others didn't take a bung, then brag about it ;)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for a strength in depth team with no out and out No1 I would like

c wright

n lunna

mpt

ully

t proctor

lambo

j smith

solid all the way through be very good at home

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for a strength in depth team with no out and out No1 I would like

c wright

n lunna

mpt

ully

t proctor

lambo

j smith

solid all the way through be very good at home

 

That's what they said last year but the weren't and it was their undoing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That's what they said last year but the weren't and it was their undoing.

Definitely got to go with a proper NO1,If they don't can see more than 3 home defeat's next season .IMO heat 1 is the most important race as it goes a long way to determine how the meeting will pan out and can build a teams confidence up.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But were the only to grant permission - in the other cases the alternative fixtures had priority

 

Surely if the alternative fixture had priority then a facility would have been granted?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Surely if the alternative fixture had priority then a facility would have been granted?

No because of rearrangements for dates not on the original calender.

 

Due to priority given in the international fixture list Lambert for example had to go to Poland but the absence could not be covered by a facility within British rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Grondal back then on a 4.39 ave

👀😣😩

 

So we've so far gone back to a couple of riders we've got rid of previously for not being very good in a strength in depth side in Grondal and MPT and Ostergaard and Lambert who's commitment can't be doubted but their best days are long gone.

 

13.76 left

 

1 Ostergaard

2 Lunna

3 MPT

4

5

6 Lambert

7 Grondal

Edited by Flappy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy