Baldyman 6,243 Posted February 4, 2018 Ged must have had riders in mind before the nicholls and Kennett saga Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jenga 2,998 Posted February 4, 2018 think ged,s blinkered all the time , can only see his rules ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daytripper 1,123 Posted February 4, 2018 On 2 February 2018 at 4:26 PM, blupanther said: Best you tell the Government then, as that was copied and pasted from their website... So how does Scott get round Section 83 of the Equality Act ? Even if he gets his case off the ground the season will be over before it gets to a hearing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flappy 1,591 Posted February 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Baldyman said: Ged must have had riders in mind before the nicholls and Kennett saga Yep probably 2 of the following list Konopka Dilger Barrett Hall Bacon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
New era Panthers 2,055 Posted February 4, 2018 12 minutes ago, Daytripper said: So how does Scott get round Section 83 of the Equality Act ? Even if he gets his case off the ground the season will be over before it gets to a hearing. True but isn't it a fact the BSPA want to break Jed Rathbone and see this as one way of doing so. I for one don't believe this is all about Scott Nicholls and Eddie Kennett. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Noodles 1,337 Posted February 4, 2018 On 01/02/2018 at 9:53 PM, blupanther said: Indirect discrimination - putting rules or arrangements in place that apply to everyone, but that put someone with a protected characteristic at an unfair disadvantage. Not relevant. The 9 'protected characteristics' in law you refer to are - age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion/belief, sex, sexual orientation, marriage/civil partnership and pregnancy/maternity. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,683 Posted February 4, 2018 8 minutes ago, Noodles said: Not relevant. The 9 'protected characteristics' in law you refer to are - age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion/belief, sex, sexual orientation, marriage/civil partnership and pregnancy/maternity. Scott wants to race - thats one of the 9 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flappy 1,591 Posted February 4, 2018 1 hour ago, New era Panthers said: True but isn't it a fact the BSPA want to break Jed Rathbone and see this as one way of doing so. I for one don't believe this is all about Scott Nicholls and Eddie Kennett. Disagree with this everyone hates Panthers/Rathbone theory. This rule was in place when Nicholls had a deal lined up to ride for Lakeside. Panthers hadn't a clue where to go with team buildingso thought they'd wait to see if this overturned most likely after speaking with Nicholls directly who felt who could get it overturned. If Panthers really felt this way they'd be doing everything to track a sideto win trophiesand not just signing mates of the promotion 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jenga 2,998 Posted February 4, 2018 1 hour ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said: Scott wants to race - thats one of the 9 i take it scott is not racing this tear . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Haza 1,765 Posted February 4, 2018 1 hour ago, New era Panthers said: True but isn't it a fact the BSPA want to break Jed Rathbone and see this as one way of doing so. I for one don't believe this is all about Scott Nicholls and Eddie Kennett. It’s got more todo with Jack Hoder missing the 4s and what went on between the BSPA and the Pboro Promotion from that date on than it had todo with Scott Nicholls . 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,683 Posted February 4, 2018 42 minutes ago, Haza said: It’s got more todo with Jack Hoder missing the 4s and what went on between the BSPA and the Pboro Promotion from that date on than it had todo with Scott Nicholls . The non reversal in this New Year maybe but the reintroduction of the restriction was before Boro's involvement. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Argos 262 Posted February 4, 2018 YOU take a “Bung” so they are Banned from the AGM so they have no say in the forthcoming Season, can’t say I have a great deal of sympathy for the Peterborough Promoters that they now find them selves in,and as for Scott taking legal Action forget it far to expensive and the Season would be over before it was brought to Court 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,683 Posted February 4, 2018 17 minutes ago, Argos said: YOU take a “Bung” so they are Banned from the AGM so they have no say in the forthcoming Season, can’t say I have a great deal of sympathy for the Peterborough Promoters that they now find them selves in,and as for Scott taking legal Action forget it far to expensive and the Season would be over before it was brought to Court I dont think money would be an issue if Scott had family backing to take on the establishment I think speedway would run out of money before the Nicholls Im not saying I believe thats whats planned - just that it wouldnt be the concern if it came to it as a matter of principle If you have seen the thoughts of Guy Nicholls on Twitter you will know he doesnt hold high regard for how the sport is currently run Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LagutaRacingFan 1,919 Posted February 4, 2018 I'm told Jack Holder has offered his services for the first couple of weeks. He's looking for practise before Poland begins. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv 10,683 Posted February 4, 2018 1 minute ago, JeremyCorbynFan said: I'm told Jack Holder has offered his services for the first couple of weeks. He's looking for practise before Poland begins. Captain Birdseye on the prowl again 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites