Barney Rabbit 725 Posted February 27, 2018 1 hour ago, bigcatdiary said: Cook wasn’t at the AGM, Lakeside at that time wasn’t in either the Premiership or the Championship. Ah, ok. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tsunami 10,219 Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, Barney Rabbit said: Was it decided then? http://www.speedwaygb.co/news.php?extend.33591 No mention of it here. Not everything makes it to the News release as well we all know. Actually I might have to revise my previous statement when I said that Ged had signed Scott in December or January. I'm told he signed him before the AGM and it was well known. Edited February 27, 2018 by Tsunami 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dodger Blue 146 Posted February 27, 2018 54 minutes ago, Tsunami said: Not everything makes it to the News release as well we all know. Actually I might have to revise my previous statement when I said that Ged had signed Scot in December or January. I'm told he signed him before the AGM and it was well known. That may account for why the rule was brought in!!!!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barney Rabbit 725 Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tsunami said: Actually I might have to revise my previous statement when I said that Ged had signed Scot in December or January. I'm told he signed him before the AGM and it was well known. If that is the case, it explains everything. Edited February 27, 2018 by Barney Rabbit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stainlesssteelride 106 Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) Does people think there is an agenda against Ged? Or just unfortunate circumstances Edited February 27, 2018 by Stainlesssteelride Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
All4back 40 Posted February 27, 2018 18 minutes ago, Stainlesssteelride said: Does people think their is an agenda against Ged? Or just unfortunate circumstances Bit of both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tsunami 10,219 Posted February 27, 2018 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Stainlesssteelride said: Does people think their is an agenda against Ged? Or just unfortunate circumstances Surely it has been Ged's decisions that has caused the problems and attracted opposition, especially his actions on Holdergate. The Scott affair was deemed illegal and now been corrected, but Ged has not played a straight bat with this matter, and could and should have acted in a less combative way. I think there has been a bit of twit for tat between Ged and the BSPA, but there is a way of working with your partners in any organisation and this is not a good case of that. Edited February 27, 2018 by Tsunami 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jenga 2,998 Posted February 27, 2018 youre spelling is terrrablee how can youmiss sphell tat ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wealdstone 3,454 Posted February 27, 2018 1 hour ago, Tsunami said: Surely it has been Ged's decisions that has caused the problems and attracted opposition, especially his actions on Holdergate. The Scott affair was deemed illegal and now been corrected, but Ged has not played a straight bat with this matter, and could and should have acted in a less combative way. I think there has been a bit of twit for tat between Ged and the BSPA, but there is a way of working with your partners in any organisation and this is not a good case of that. I would have thought suspension and a punitive fine to say nothing about being ordered to to give free admission was pretty combative. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tsunami 10,219 Posted February 27, 2018 1 hour ago, wealdstone said: I would have thought suspension and a punitive fine to say nothing about being ordered to to give free admission was pretty combative. Your opinion, but others could say a person who breaks rules he has signed to uphold, deserves sometimes a harsh sentence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wealdstone 3,454 Posted February 27, 2018 1 hour ago, Tsunami said: Your opinion, but others could say a person who breaks rules he has signed to uphold, deserves sometimes a harsh sentence. I do not and never have supported Ged regarding Holder. However I do believe his version of events as it would seem do others when the matter escalated and went to a higher authority. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tsunami 10,219 Posted February 27, 2018 9 minutes ago, wealdstone said: I do not and never have supported Ged regarding Holder. However I do believe his version of events as it would seem do others when the matter escalated and went to a higher authority. There could be two versions of the truth though. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crump99 4,474 Posted February 27, 2018 36 minutes ago, Tsunami said: There could be two versions of the truth though. There's always only one and it usually sits in the middle of the supposed two options given. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigcatdiary 3,164 Posted February 27, 2018 38 minutes ago, Tsunami said: There could be two versions of the truth though. Of course their is The BSPA issued a press release saying they and the SCB had thrashed out a solution, when in truth the SCB/ACU had said it was unlawful and wouldn’t be included in this years rulebook. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ruffdiamond 6,115 Posted February 27, 2018 1 hour ago, Tsunami said: There could be two versions of the truth though. Yeah,,, one'll be right and one'll be wrong Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
