Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Flappy

Peterborough Panthers 2018

Recommended Posts

Opened up fine for me from the menu drop down

Looks like shield meetings included after all despite quite clearly stating in the regs that its league matches only!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

Opened up fine for me from the menu drop down

Looks like shield meetings included after all despite quite clearly stating in the regs that its league matches only!!

Indeed, I dare say the real reason for now including Shield matches will show its face with some new team declarations.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another bizarre point is the non change for the likes of Covatti and Vissing who despite having at least the 4 home 4 away retain their current average until they reach 20 meetings

Only those assessed it seems are revised after 4 home 4 away.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

Now 7.62 after first green sheet revision

Grondal drops to reserve too

Ostergraard has declared himself fit to ride at Sheffield Thursday night but both him and Grondal  will be missing the Friday meeting at Edinburgh due to Danish commitment's . With Newcastle the only championship team not riding Friday night it's going to leave very little choice on guest riders . Maybe best to go with R/R for Ostergaard  and bring in Ashley Morris to replace Grondal .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Their has been a further GSA today (issue 2 dated 1/5/18) which supercedes Issue 1dated 30/4/18.

This has changed completely a lot of the averages for the fixtures at the end of the week.

Its clear that the GSA now include Championship Shield matches, which is of course completely contrary to the current SCB regulations.

The words utter shambles spring to mind.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shield matches included (carpet lifted)

Supplementary regulation in production (brush)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, bigcatdiary said:

Their has been a further GSA today (issue 2 dated 1/5/18) which supercedes Issue 1dated 30/4/18.

This has changed completely a lot of the averages for the fixtures at the end of the week.

Its clear that the GSA now include Championship Shield matches, which is of course completely contrary to the current SCB regulations.

The words utter shambles spring to mind.

The change today is that rather than a 20 meeting sample it is now rolling over 30 meetings!

Have also corrected the anomaly I ststed re Covatti Vissing etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Stainlesssteelride said:

And yet people still pay good money to watch this made up as you go along sport.

There are plenty more that have walked away i'm afraid ....

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, blupanther said:

There are plenty more that have walked away i'm afraid ....

Exactly... I find it hard to believe people still hand their cash over week in week out . I no longer do. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, blupanther said:

There are plenty more that have walked away i'm afraid ....

Exactly... I find it hard to believe people still hand their cash over week in week out . I no longer do. 

I suppose it's easier to do so at the showground though.as the racing is normally always top drawer.

Edited by Stainlesssteelride
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

The change today is that rather than a 20 meeting sample it is now rolling over 30 meetings!

Have also corrected the anomaly I ststed re Covatti Vissing etc...

Apparently the sample will reduce by 2 each month to reach 20 at the year end

Last year the final figures were on 36 meetings and it was felt dropping nearly half at the first review would not be right

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

Apparently the sample will reduce by 2 each month to reach 20 at the year end

Last year the final figures were on 36 meetings and it was felt dropping nearly half at the first review would not be right

Was too simple,so let's complicate things!!!!!!!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy