LagutaRacingFan 1,931 Posted December 20, 2017 If Nicholls is blocked from riding in the Championship, it will be a huge own goal by the BSPA. The fans want to see Nicholls riding in the Championship, Peterborough aren't asking for any advantage! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Argos 262 Posted December 20, 2017 What else do Peterborough expect, due to the Promoters being excluded from attending AGM due to their disgraceful BungGate actions Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crazyb 156 Posted December 20, 2017 9 hours ago, balderdash&piffle said: With our BSPA think you need plan c-d-e & f as well I reckon Panthers need to use all the letters of the alphabet, they've never got rebuilding right since Swales became a promoter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crazyb 156 Posted December 20, 2017 2 hours ago, scaramanga said: id say some promoters dont have the time to travel abroad for a meeting that is dictated by promoters who hold high positions in the sport this is british speedway the meeting should be held in britten and it should involve all who want to take part the following season britten!! You should apply to join the BSPA. You'll go far 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ruffdiamond 6,115 Posted December 20, 2017 21 minutes ago, crazyb said: I reckon Panthers need to use all the letters of the alphabet, they've never got rebuilding right since Swales became a promoter could try starting off with 'stickle bricks'. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TesarRacing 1,825 Posted December 21, 2017 7 hours ago, ruffdiamond said: could try starting off with 'stickle bricks'. Can you still get them?!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crump99 4,474 Posted December 21, 2017 10 hours ago, Argos said: What else do Peterborough expect, due to the Promoters being excluded from attending AGM due to their disgraceful BungGate actions It happens irrespective of attendance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crump99 4,474 Posted December 21, 2017 11 hours ago, bigcatdiary said: Surely the answer is to not let make the rules at all, they just are not trustworthy and competent to do it. Trustworthyness is not the main issue, it's transparency and communication that's the problem although I suppose that it's one and the same thing really. They need to draw a line now and say that the past is the past and that there are no precedents for decisions going forward. Then they have to clearly explain how future decisions are reached so that everone is clear. There are no favours or special dispensation. If the lunatics want to run the asylum, and they cleary do, then they've got to start being competent. Tough ask I know but while we still have some sport left it'd be a good idea! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crump99 4,474 Posted December 21, 2017 14 hours ago, Panthers89 said: So we had the Hokey Cokey cup, now we have a Hokey Cokey team, shambles. Who had the last laugh there? Coventry gone. Both clubs having to suffer the supremo. Panthers nearly gone a couple of times at least since and now mid table lower tier struggling to put a team together? Hopefully plan A or B come off and are a surprise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
proud panther 1,505 Posted December 21, 2017 Hans Andersen with a rule change plus ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimg 26 Posted December 21, 2017 12 hours ago, JeremyCorbynFan said: If Nicholls is blocked from riding in the Championship, it will be a huge own goal by the BSPA. The fans want to see Nicholls riding in the Championship, Peterborough aren't asking for any advantage! What I would like to know is why was this rule made at all ?, for what reason ?, would like the SCB to publish an explanation of the reasoning behind it ,as we all know we will not get one from the BSPA , jimg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heedthebaw 439 Posted December 21, 2017 1 hour ago, jimg said: What I would like to know is why was this rule made at all ?, for what reason ?, would like the SCB to publish an explanation of the reasoning behind it ,as we all know we will not get one from the BSPA , jimg They believe it would make the two leagues too close to the same standard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baldyman 6,243 Posted December 21, 2017 1 hour ago, jimg said: What I would like to know is why was this rule made at all ?, for what reason ?, would like the SCB to publish an explanation of the reasoning behind it ,as we all know we will not get one from the BSPA , jimg It was only last season that the rule wasn't in place....so it's not a new rule. Harris took advantage last year when the rule was not in place, Scott didn't...Although he was offered a place at one club he chose not to take it because of the money on offer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fromafar 10,359 Posted December 21, 2017 6 minutes ago, Baldyman said: It was only last season that the rule wasn't in place....so it's not a new rule. Harris took advantage last year when the rule was not in place, Scott didn't...Although he was offered a place at one club he chose not to take it because of the money on offer. You have to Question the logic of changing the the rule for one season only.It proves that last years doubling up theory was totally stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baldyman 6,243 Posted December 21, 2017 You do...and they shouldn't have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
