Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Sign in to follow this  
PHILIPRISING

Woffinden Or Harris

Recommended Posts

SHOULD Wolverhampton been allowed to bring in Tai Woffinden to replace the injured Freddie Lindgren in the race-offs against Swindon?

 

There is an argument that Woffinden, a Wolverhampton asset, would have been a more credible replacement than a guest. That old speedway cliche "special dispensation" springs to mind.

 

The front cover of Speedway Star this week features a photo of Sheffield's title winning team but, of course, there is an unfamiliar Tigers' face in the shape of guest Scott Nicholls.

 

Chris Harris has probably ridden in more play-off finals than any rider, frequently not for his own team. Just one more reason why so many fail to take British speedway seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not if it's against the rules

YOU should know better

Are you Shovlar in disguise, dangling some bait?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Harris - no contest.

 

What's credible about bringing a rider in to guest who has turned his back on British speedway?

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not if it's against the rules

YOU should know better

Are you Shovlar in disguise, dangling some bait?

I KNOW its against the rules as they stand. I am just throwing the argument into the arena. But we have heard from many who think that Wolves being able to use one of their own assets, perhaps Peter Karlsson, would have been a better option for the sport as a whole. But, then again, who cares about that anyway.

Harris - no contest.

 

What's credible about bringing a rider in to guest who has turned his back on British speedway?

PLAYING devil's advocate, if he is a Wolves asset is he actually a guest?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't want to see him racing in the final, he doesn't want to race here any other time.....

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe if Wolves win, he'll come out and do a lap of honour, as is his wont

WHY bring cricket into it?

Eh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I KNOW its against the rules as they stand. I am just throwing the argument into the arena. But we have heard from many who think that Wolves being able to use one of their own assets, perhaps Peter Karlsson, would have been a better option for the sport as a whole. But, then again, who cares about that anyway.

PLAYING devil's advocate, if he is a Wolves asset is he actually a guest?

No rider who hasn't ridden in Britain this season should be allowed, don't care if it's Karlsson, Woffinden or Uncle Tom Cobley.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't want to see him racing in the final, he doesn't want to race here any other time.....

SO you are in favour of guests even if there could be an alternative? And it wouldn't be to pander to Woffinden but to provide a credible replacement for an injured rider.

 

And before too many over-heat, just filling time between heats with a healthy (so far) discussion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Woffy is an Wolves asset. Does that make him a guest. Seems strange having a Rye rider in the final in a Wolves jacket.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe if Wolves win, he'll come out and do a lap of honour, as is his wont

 

Eh?

THINK about it

No rider who hasn't ridden in Britain this season should be allowed, don't care if it's Karlsson, Woffinden or Uncle Tom Cobley.

SAME question ... you prefer guests?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy