Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Recommended Posts

I was hoping for a positive AGM that would make me excited for the new season.

 

True to form, that hasn't happened..

 

I want to see Robins riders ride for Swindon, not to be forced out for no good reason !

 

Very disillusioned at the moment !

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rule was voted in by the 4 teams who didn't make the play-offs!!

 

Sounds about right considering Somerset cant afford top riders. Nobody but NKI would want to ride for Buster. Rye House plan on using Harris, KK and Nicholls I would think and Leicester already have a No.1

But now there are other options.......!! :-)

 

Not going to get any superstars on a 7 something average. Hope so but I cant see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, is it just one tac sub permitted for next season?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More top riders on there way they keep telling us and then they have the agm what a joke and to top it all we could lose the world champion as well

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, is it just one tac sub permitted for next season?

Gordon Pairman posted on another thread that it is just 1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just when you think everything is going right in the agm along come the teams at the bottom we want to introducea stupid rule so we get a top rider,so next year when all those 4 teams finish in the bottom 4 again what they going to do then 1 rider over 7 ffs,why does this sport allways get draged down nearly every year the product gets weaker due to the teams who dont do well crying we want top riders,if you cant attract top riders why the hell are you in the top league!!

 

LET TEAMS BUILD FREELY TO HOW THEY SEE FIT ARGHHH!!!

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The worst agm ever ..they take a step forward by going to set race nights giving them a chance to bring better riders in. then they take it away by only allowing one rider over 8 .yet again when Poole see teams with an a advantage along comes this crap rule .You have a points limit if teams wants to go top heavy then that should be allowed to . it's bad enough for swindon losing Thursday's but not having Doyle or morris will kill there crowds .it fact the league might lose the world champion completely .And finally the worst thing of all time bringing the stupid and unfair old ts sub rule back ..no doubt they must have listened to the fans over 60.Double points was Mickey mouse this is far worst what a joke .

Someone's not happy! 🤣🤣
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poole actually voted for making up the team as promoters see fit. With Belle Vue unable to vote the bottom four voted for only one above 8 so riders would be fairly distributed. Poole, Swindon and Wolves outvoted.

 

Magic was a possible return to Poole in 18. Not now.

 

Of course they did. Safe in the knowledge that the bottom four would pass the motion.

 

Just as they have done in the past. Little doubt Ford or one of his cohorts will have had a word in the ear of one of those lower teams and planted the seed. We've seen it too many times before.

 

The main team it seems to screw though is Swindon.. Wolves and Belle Vue shouldn't have much of an issue, especially if Wolves can tempt Piotr Pawlicki back. Top three of Lindgren, Masters and Pawlicki, combined with the old tac sub rule would be very strong.

 

If Wolves were stupid enough to let Pawlicki join Poole... that changes things.

Edited by BWitcher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they did. Safe in the knowledge that the bottom four would pass the motion.

 

Just as they have done in the past. Little doubt Ford or one of his cohorts will have had a word in the ear of one of those lower teams and planted the seed. We've seen it too many times before.

 

The main team it seems to screw though is Swindon.. Wolves and Belle Vue shouldn't have much of an issue, especially if Wolves can tempt Piotr Pawlicki back. Top three of Lindgren, Masters and Pawlicki, combined with the old tac sub rule would be very strong.

 

If Wolves were stupid enough to let Pawlicki join Poole... that changes things.

Who’s to say cvs didn’t have a word safe in the knowledge.........

 

The decision for only one above 8 is not Poole’s making.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they did. Safe in the knowledge that the bottom four would pass the motion.

 

Just as they have done in the past. Little doubt Ford or one of his cohorts will have had a word in the ear of one of those lower teams and planted the seed. We've seen it too many times before.

 

The main team it seems to screw though is Swindon.. Wolves and Belle Vue shouldn't have much of an issue, especially if Wolves can tempt Piotr Pawlicki back. Top three of Lindgren, Masters and Pawlicki, combined with the old tac sub rule would be very strong.

 

If Wolves were stupid enough to let Pawlicki join Poole... that changes things.

You don't know how Ford works then, he has and still wants strong teams not weakened product year on year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Above all he wants a winning team though and whether this rule was his idea or not it makes it more likely Poole will be one of the best sides in 2018.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poole bashing for no reason what so ever.

Pathetic.

It was done by a vote.

They're all as untrustworthy as the next promoter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poole bashing for no reason what so ever.

Pathetic.

It was done by a vote.

They're all as untrustworthy as the next promoter.

It's was done by a vote after Cov won the league ..wake up and stop being so naïve .

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet again the BSPA show the world that they are a bunch of incompetent buffoons.

 

:rofl: Nothing changes then.

Edited by Starman2006

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy