'the Donald' Trump

[iris123 14,842]

Your belief in these myths are unbreakable. Bet you both still believe in Father Christmas even when seeing your dad dressed up in the gear 

[Kester 2,171]

8 minutes ago, iris123 said:

Your belief in these myths are unbreakable. Bet you both still believe in Father Christmas even when seeing your dad dressed up in the gear 

You'd think after a whole year of wittering and predictions, none of which came true, they'd realise they were being lied to.

In fact, you'd think they'd notice that all the hysteria, the drama, the predictions, the joining of dots (making stuff up) exists only on their social media feeds - nowhere else.  

[iris123 14,842]

Just now, Kester said:

You'd think after a whole year of wittering and predictions, none of which came true, they'd realise they were being lied to.

In fact, you'd think they'd notice that all the hysteria, the drama, the predictions, the joining of dots (making stuff up) exists only on their social media feeds - nowhere else.  

The good thing about a conspiracy is you can never really prove it wrong to the believers. Every bit of proof is dismissed as part of the conspiracy. It is brilliant 

[Kester 2,171]

19 minutes ago, iris123 said:

The good thing about a conspiracy is you can never really prove it wrong to the believers. Every bit of proof is dismissed as part of the conspiracy. It is brilliant 

As I've said before, you can't defeat a conspiracy with logic because there is nothing logical about it. 

And as we've seen on here, the layers of the conspiracy are vast and many (and often contradictory), so when none of it is actually happening it doesn't matter.  Just keep pressing on, adding more layers.

Edited September 25, 2021 by Kester

[norbold 4,578]

1 hour ago, Wolfsbane said:

Looking right when they should be looking left

Hmmm, this game looks a bit more difficult.

I'll try: Looking like a complete idiot when they should be looking at the proven facts.

[Blupanther 19,678]

Imagine not knowing the difference between a recount and an audit...

[iris123 14,842]

3 minutes ago, Blupanther said:

Imagine not knowing the difference between a recount and an audit...

Don’t matter. Trump lost. That is all 

[norbold 4,578]

1 hour ago, Blupanther said:

Imagine not knowing the difference between a recount and an audit...

That's not an answer to the question I asked you. Any chance of a proper answer?

[Kester 2,171]

9 hours ago, Blupanther said:

Imagine not knowing the difference between a recount and an audit...

Of course we know the difference.

Imagine now having to go on about the difference because the audit was a dud.

What do you think Trump wanted out of the audit?

Why do you think Lindell, Lin Wood and all the other mugs pumped nearly 6 million dollars into it?

They were paying to be told Trump won the state.  He didn't.  For Trump and his supporters it was a disaster.

 

It was doomed as soon a Jack Sellers told the audit, and the people behind it, to be prepared to defend whatever they found in court.  From that point on they were never going to lie about the actual numbers (which is all they were interested in) because if it ended in court where the lies would be easily exposed it will be Karen Fann and the other Trump brown-nosers who will be kissing their careers goodbye.  Instead they have just put out noise about deleted voters, duplicate votes etc etc.  And that's what it is - noise.  Noise for the MAGA crowd to wet themselves over.  Despite the fact that if they actually looked into it properly they'd realise that it was all nonsense.  Did you not notice that Logan did exactly the same thing in front of the Senate a few weeks ago?

Again, why don't you and Wolfie treat yourself to a bit of reality and read the Maricopa County Twitter thread.  

And then why don't you tell us exactly how and where they are wrong and clueless chancer Doug Logan is right.

 

Of course, neither of you will.

We'll just have more of this drivel for a little while and then it'll die away because none of it has anything to do with reality and will never trouble the real world in any way.

Exactly like everything else the two of you have posted in this thread.

Edited September 26, 2021 by Kester

[andout 485]

23 hours ago, norbold said:

It's official!

And this official source is.....?

Twitter....

[iris123 14,842]

Taken for mugs

[Blupanther 19,678]

Interesting perspective from the Sunday Times...

[norbold 4,578]

Thanks for that Bluey, but you seem to have not included the part where it shows how the election was rigged and how Rod Liddle knows this and what his evidence is.

By the way, is this the same Rod Liddle who, in October 2019, commented in an article in The Spectator that the forthcoming General Election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote? I suppose that does make him a bit of an expert on rigging elections, I'll give him that.

[Blupanther 19,678]

According to the forensic audit report that was released last Friday. in Arizona USA 58,550 voters turned up on election day Nov 3, 2020 and were told they already voted by mail-in ballot without their knowledge. THIS IS FRAUD ON A MASSIVE SCALE...

[iris123 14,842]

10 minutes ago, Blupanther said:

According to the forensic audit report that was released last Friday. in Arizona USA 58,550 voters turned up on election day Nov 3, 2020 and were told they already voted by mail-in ballot without their knowledge. THIS IS FRAUD ON A MASSIVE SCALE...

It is quite amazing the 58,000 figure is the same that cropped up in the previous election

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.azcentral.com/amp/308435001