Charlie Webster - Malaria

[Steve Shovlar 10,439]

Charlie Webster, along with that althlete Jessica Ennis-Hill both went out of their way to publicly abuse Ched Evans. Whilst they might have had the right when he was banged up in prison, humility in apologising once it had been found that he was innocent would have been the correct step to take.

Neither Webster or Hill have found it in themselves to do the right thing. Got no time for either of them.

I will also say if she’s got malaria it’s her own fault. Wouldn’t wish it on her but really, if you are heading to a country where there’s a chance of contracting malaria, you take a course of medication before leaving the UK.

Edited April 20, 2018 by Steve Shovlar

[Starman2006 2,354]

2 hours ago, Steve Shovlar said:

Charlie Webster, along with that althlete Jessica Ennis-Hill both went out of their way to publicly abuse Ched Evans. Whilst they might have had the right when he was banged up in prison, humility in apologising once it had been found that he was innocent would have been the correct step to take.

Neither Webster or Hill have found it in themselves to do the right thing. Got no time for either of them.

I will also say if she’s got malaria it’s her own fault. Wouldn’t wish it on her but really, if you are heading to a country where there’s a chance of contracting malaria, you take a course of medication before leaving the UK.

In thiery Steve, Evens could now if he wanted to take action. Seeing that he is now been cleared inocent.

[Tsunami 10,219]

16 hours ago, iris123 said:

Sometimes when in a hole it is better to chuck the shovel away rather than keep digging......

Have you reached Australia yet ?

[Tigerblade 221]

2 hours ago, Steve Shovlar said:

Charlie Webster, along with that althlete Jessica Ennis-Hill both went out of their way to publicly abuse Ched Evans. Whilst they might have had the right when he was banged up in prison, humility in apologising once it had been found that he was innocent would have been the correct step to take.

Neither Webster or Hill have found it in themselves to do the right thing. Got no time for either of them.

I will also say if she’s got malaria it’s her own fault. Wouldn’t wish it on her but really, if you are heading to a country where there’s a chance of contracting malaria, you take a course of medication before leaving the UK.

Jessica Ennis-Hill didn't - she was forced into it by various media because SUFC had named a stand after her after her 2012 Olympic triumph.  In my opinion this was a bandwagon jumping exercise as she has never claimed to be a football fan, what else was she meant to say with the hysteria surrounding this issue at the time??  Yet she seems to be carrying the can for everyone who had an opinion about the issue. 

Charlie Webster did go out of her way to have her say.  But I still find some of the comments and sniping at other posters on here a bit pathetic.  Some fans may be interested to know how she is now. 

 

Edited April 20, 2018 by Tigerblade

[Tsunami 10,219]

3 hours ago, Tigerblade said:

Jessica Ennis-Hill didn't - she was forced into it by various media because SUFC had named a stand after her after her 2012 Olympic triumph.  In my opinion this was a bandwagon jumping exercise as she has never claimed to be a football fan, what else was she meant to say with the hysteria surrounding this issue at the time??  Yet she seems to be carrying the can for everyone who had an opinion about the issue. 

Charlie Webster did go out of her way to have her say.  But I still find some of the comments and sniping at other posters on here a bit pathetic.  Some fans may be interested to know how she is now. 

 

Quite agree that there is some pathetic statement on here from folks who should know better. Many like me, still think he was hardly innocent, but a powerfull expensive lawyer employed by his then girlfriend and now wife's father,  managed to get the decision they were after. Money still talks eh.

[Tsunami 10,219]

10 hours ago, steve roberts said:

...personally I rarely bother trawling thru' to see if there is a similar thread on any particular subject before starting one.

Quite agree, as some folks don't have the time that others think everyone else has. There are two threads on Ivan Mauger, but has anybody been hurt by this rule breaking ? Some folks need to grow up and get on with their lives.

[orion 7,612]

6 hours ago, Tsunami said:

Quite agree that there is some pathetic statement on here from folks who should know better. Many like me, still think he was hardly innocent, but a powerfull expensive lawyer employed by his then girlfriend and now wife's father,  managed to get the decision they were after. Money still talks eh.

Money does talk but there was no way money or no money that should have him guilty in fact the case should have never gone to court as  the case was so weak .

As for Webster she should have kept her nose out ..I hope she can do a better job at this than she did at speedway presenting as she was hopeless at that .

 

Edited April 20, 2018 by orion

[Tsunami 10,219]

10 hours ago, orion said:

Money does talk but there was no way money or no money that should have him guilty in fact the case should have never gone to court as  the case was so weak .

As for Webster she should have kept her nose out ..I hope she can do a better job at this than she did at speedway presenting as she was hopeless at that .

 

Sneaking into a hotel illegally, and jumping on after your mate with a female not fit to defend herself, is alright in your eyes is it. Specsavers for you then. Some of us have higher, or just have, some morals unlike some.

[orion 7,612]

10 hours ago, Tsunami said:

Sneaking into a hotel illegally, and jumping on after your mate with a female not fit to defend herself, is alright in your eyes is it. Specsavers for you then. Some of us have higher, or just have, some morals unlike some.

When was even showed with out doubt that she was not fit to defend herself ? that was all about opinion ...quite clearly the court thought otherwise as  they  returned not  guilty verdicts once all the facts come to light .having bad morals and being found guilty of rape are two different things completely something that you and the likes Webster fail to understand 

The bottom is some girl thought It was fun to get off with some footballers then cry rape in the morning and try to cash in on it ...if that is your high morals your welcome to them .

 

 

 

Edited April 21, 2018 by orion
more info

[Tsunami 10,219]

1 hour ago, orion said:

When was even showed with out doubt that she was not fit to defend herself ? that was all about opinion ...quite clearly the court thought otherwise as  they  returned not  guilty verdicts once all the facts come to light .having bad morals and being found guilty of rape are two different things completely something that you and the likes Webster fail to understand 

The bottom is some girl thought It was fun to get off with some footballers then cry rape in the morning and try to cash in on it ...if that is your high morals your welcome to them .

 

 

 

Do you every have the brains to read about what you comment on.

The first court found Ched guilty, but a high paid lawyer paid for by a rich daddy got him off.

The girl was pissed and being carried. She went to the Police the following day to report a lost purse, and when they heard the circumstances they told her she had been raped.

Stick to your Whoosh as its the only thing your post worthy reading . More crap from you.

[orion 7,612]

1 hour ago, Tsunami said:

Do you every have the brains to read about what you comment on.

The first court found Ched guilty, but a high paid lawyer paid for by a rich daddy got him off.

The girl was pissed and being carried. She went to the Police the following day to report a lost purse, and when they heard the circumstances they told her she had been raped.

Stick to your Whoosh as its the only thing your post worthy reading . More crap from you.

? She made her way to the Hotel Room with out any help ..Yet again it was a matter of opinion if she was pissed ..looking at the amount she had  drunk it was highly unlikely and  she was in control of what she was doing, and quite clearly the jury agreed .

It was a weak case and in the end justice was served ..sadly you have become a bitter loser as the case never went the way you hoped..

 

Edited April 21, 2018 by orion
.

[Tsunami 10,219]

12 hours ago, orion said:

? She made her way to the Hotel Room with out any help ..Yet again it was a matter of opinion if she was pissed ..looking at the amount she had  drunk it was highly unlikely and  she was in control of what she was doing, and quite clearly the jury agreed .

It was a weak case and in the end justice was served ..sadly you have become a bitter loser as the case never went the way you hoped..

 

Oh dear. Getting comments like that from orion and being liked by the squeaky clean Midland Red. 

[The Third Man 2,213]

17 hours ago, orion said:

? She made her way to the Hotel Room with out any help ..Yet again it was a matter of opinion if she was pissed ..looking at the amount she had  drunk it was highly unlikely and  she was in control of what she was doing, and quite clearly the jury agreed .

It was a weak case and in the end justice was served ..sadly you have become a bitter loser as the case never went the way you hoped..

 

But one jury didn't

you seem to know a lot about the evidence were you in court on both occasions listening to it all?

[orion 7,612]

3 hours ago, The Third Man said:

But one jury didn't

you seem to know a lot about the evidence were you in court on both occasions listening to it all?

One jury never had all the facts ..once the second  did of course it only took them 2 hours after a 8 day case to clear him ..not sure you have to be Perry Mason or to be in court to figure out what that meant .

 

[The Third Man 2,213]

25 minutes ago, orion said:

One jury never had all the facts ..once the second  did of course it only took them 2 hours after a 8 day case to clear him ..not sure you have to be Perry Mason or to be in court to figure out what that meant .

 

so I take you weren't there then so you don't know the facts, OK