Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Starman2006 said:

Rubbish, had we not used an elilgble guest it would have not been sanctioned, so get off your high horse and just accept it.

 

Let us be clear. There is and never has been any rule anywhere in the rulebook that makes Nick Morris an eligible guest in the second leg.

We can debate whether or not it was appropriate for the SCB to sanction his use but it certainly wasn't within the rules as laid down in the rulebook.

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poole fans missing the point but nothing new there.

Because Kings Lynn agreed to it (more fool them) doesnt make it right that the powers that be approved it.

Whats more farcical...................having a rider ride for both teams or to have an illegal rider? Both make a mockery of our once great sport.

And the three teams that top the table......Kings Lynn, Peterborough and Mildenhall .....all fail to win their leagues.

Poole won the league because they fielded the worst 1-7 for the first few months..............nice to be rewarded for failure.

Peterborough and Mildenhall were decimated by injuries, similar to Kings Lynn, Somerset and Belle Vue............Poole would have easily lost the semis to a full strength Somerset but you can only beat whats in front of you so Poole were lucky to face a 5 man team

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Skidder1 said:

Dale Allitt has stated publicly that it was KL's proposal to Poole which was then ratified by the SCB and BSPA MC to avoid the sport being further vilified by allowing Ellis to guest for both clubs in the final.

Come on dont let the facts ruin a good old Poole Bashing !!!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Gavan said:

Poole fans missing the point but nothing new there.

Because Kings Lynn agreed to it (more fool them) doesnt make it right that the powers that be approved it.

Whats more farcical...................having a rider ride for both teams or to have an illegal rider? Both make a mockery of our once great sport.

And the three teams that top the table......Kings Lynn, Peterborough and Mildenhall .....all fail to win their leagues.

Poole won the league because they fielded the worst 1-7 for the first few months..............nice to be rewarded for failure.

Peterborough and Mildenhall were decimated by injuries, similar to Kings Lynn, Somerset and Belle Vue............Poole would have easily lost the semis to a full strength Somerset but you can only beat whats in front of you so Poole were lucky to face a 5 man team

 

Just cant help yourself can you. We won the league you should all get over it otherwise you will ruin your Christmas How many bags of Sour grapes do you have left... ? Chomp chomp chomp

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, arnieg said:

Let us be clear. There is and never has been any rule anywhere in the rulebook that makes Nick Morris an eligible guest in the second leg.

We can debate whether or not it was appropriate for the SCB to sanction his use but it certainly wasn't within the rules as laid down in the rulebook.

 

Lets be clear, if he was not eligble then the booking would not have been sanctioned. So please, get over it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did you mug that old lady?

Him over there said it was alright. 

Where’s your own moral compass?

Don't have one. 

Edited by ouch
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, WalterPlinge said:

That makes zero sense!

Had Poole used an eligible guest it wouldn't need to be sanctioned.... because....well... it would have been eligible anyway.

They had to get permission to use an otherwise ineligible guest.    And god knows why that permission was granted.

He was eligble so please get over it. Jeez ive never known so many moaners on one site.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ouch said:

Why did you mug that old

lady. 

Him over there said it was alright. 

Think your on the wrong site mate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Gavan said:

Poole fans missing the point but nothing new there.

Because Kings Lynn agreed to it (more fool them) doesnt make it right that the powers that be approved it.

Whats more farcical...................having a rider ride for both teams or to have an illegal rider? Both make a mockery of our once great sport.

And the three teams that top the table......Kings Lynn, Peterborough and Mildenhall .....all fail to win their leagues.

Poole won the league because they fielded the worst 1-7 for the first few months..............nice to be rewarded for failure.

Peterborough and Mildenhall were decimated by injuries, similar to Kings Lynn, Somerset and Belle Vue............Poole would have easily lost the semis to a full strength Somerset but you can only beat whats in front of you so Poole were lucky to face a 5 man team

 

So are you going to congratulate Poole Pirates, Matt and Middlo, riders and the fans of the club on a fabulous backs to the wall against all the odds victory?

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gavan has just posted his reaction to Poole winning yet another championship.

762316.gif

Edited by Steve Shovlar
  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why doesn't everyone leave the Poole fans to wallow in their own glory, they will always think it is all fair and above board whatever they do.

 Why don't other posters stop biting at their comments and ignore them and just leave them to talk among themselves, they only do it to get a reaction on all sites not just their own

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Steve Shovlar said:

So are you going to congratulate Poole Pirates, Matt and Middlo, riders and the fans of the club on a fabulous backs to the wall against all the odds victory?

You should know Steve that the usual mob will always keep poking at Poole and nothing we can do about it.

Gavan does raise sensible points in his last post about teams hit or ravaged by injury and how unlucky were all the top of the League guys over all 3 leagues. Looks like it has destroyed Jolly at Mildenhall to the degree he wants out and can't even find a team for tonight which I think may be more financial with nothing left to play for.

You can make arguments in Prem for Somerset/KL/BV being unlucky. But additionally Poole also didnt have a proven heat leader all season and yes maybe the Speedway Gods did shine upon them in the play offs but sometimes you need some luck and fortune. Thats the way it is. One could argue forever what IF Ellis had ridden for Poole and Morris for KL. Ultimately it was 12 points Morris and 9 points Ellis but MAYBE had they ridden the other way around who knows what both would have scored.

Would be nice though if we could get back to what this Forum Topic is all about i.e Poole 2019. Unfortunately those who enjoy having a pop at Poole seem willing to chase all over whatever Poole topic is currently in vogue.

Roll on the BSPA meeting in 3 weeks so we can seriously start debating what this topic is i.e Poole 2019 ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, STEVEHOLS54 said:

You should know Steve that the usual mob will always keep poking at Poole and nothing we can do about it.

Gavan does raise sensible points in his last post about teams hit or ravaged by injury and how unlucky were all the top of the League guys over all 3 leagues. Looks like it has destroyed Jolly at Mildenhall to the degree he wants out and can't even find a team for tonight which I think may be more financial with nothing left to play for.

You can make arguments in Prem for Somerset/KL/BV being unlucky. But additionally Poole also didnt have a proven heat leader all season and yes maybe the Speedway Gods did shine upon them in the play offs but sometimes you need some luck and fortune. Thats the way it is. One could argue forever what IF Ellis had ridden for Poole and Morris for KL. Ultimately it was 12 points Morris and 9 points Ellis but MAYBE had they ridden the other way around who knows what both would have scored.

Would be nice though if we could get back to what this Forum Topic is all about i.e Poole 2019. Unfortunately those who enjoy having a pop at Poole seem willing to chase all over whatever Poole topic is currently in vogue.

Roll on the BSPA meeting in 3 weeks so we can seriously start debating what this topic is i.e Poole 2019 ;-)

Unfortunately one or two poole supporters dont help the situation sorry to say :nono:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, nelliejim said:

Come on dont let the facts ruin a good old Poole Bashing !!!! 

Facts?  Hearsay more like

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Gavan said:

Poole fans missing the point but nothing new there.

Because Kings Lynn agreed to it (more fool them) doesnt make it right that the powers that be approved it.

Whats more farcical...................having a rider ride for both teams or to have an illegal rider? Both make a mockery of our once great sport.

And the three teams that top the table......Kings Lynn, Peterborough and Mildenhall .....all fail to win their leagues.

Poole won the league because they fielded the worst 1-7 for the first few months..............nice to be rewarded for failure.

Peterborough and Mildenhall were decimated by injuries, similar to Kings Lynn, Somerset and Belle Vue............Poole would have easily lost the semis to a full strength Somerset but you can only beat whats in front of you so Poole were lucky to face a 5 man team

 

And that's why the play offs are not my cup of tea, as a whole seasons hard work can be undone by injuries at the wrong time... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy