Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, MattK said:

Swindon would have to adjust the strength of their team, but they wouldn't need to adjust what they pay, as they have a business model in place which allows them to pay Premiership wages. The fact that you've lowered the standard of the league doesn't reduce a club's spending power. 

It wouldn't reduce a rider's option. There are around 40 riders currently doubling-up. In one big league this would mean 20 spaces which need to be filled. On top of that you have riders opting out as they cannot commit to racing on a Friday, Saturday or Sunday due to Polish, GP, SEC, U21s and other commitments. One big league would make it a riders market.

are they making money at the moment? I doubt it

so why spend more than they have to

the one thing speedway needs is for all the promoters to agree the set up for next season and stick to it, if riders don't like it they can retire or try and get a team place on the continent

as I have said the simplest thing is the promoters to work together for the benefit of the whole, that will then benefit themselves, but as we all know that is also the hardest thing for them all to do, but don't worry because I am sure a four team PL will work   

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, The Third Man said:

are they making money at the moment? I doubt it

so why spend more than they have to

the one thing speedway needs is for all the promoters to agree the set up for next season and stick to it, if riders don't like it they can retire or try and get a team place on the continent

as I have said the simplest thing is the promoters to work together for the benefit of the whole, that will then benefit themselves, but as we all know that is also the hardest thing for them all to do, but don't worry because I am sure a four team PL will work   

Do clubs pay more than they have to today? I don't believe they do. Swindon pays Nick Morris what they do because they presumably thing he is the best rider available at that average and price. If there was a better rider available for less money, then surely Swindon would sign them?

The idea of promoters sticking together is fine, but it completely ignores the fact that speedway is a competitive sport and clubs want to win. Clearly, making a loss is an acceptable price for putting together a competitive team because if it wasn't clubs wouldn't do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, MattK said:

Do clubs pay more than they have to today? I don't believe they do. Swindon pays Nick Morris what they do because they presumably thing he is the best rider available at that average and price. If there was a better rider available for less money, then surely Swindon would sign them?

The idea of promoters sticking together is fine, but it completely ignores the fact that speedway is a competitive sport and clubs want to win. Clearly, making a loss is an acceptable price for putting together a competitive team because if it wasn't clubs wouldn't do it.

Why are so many in Financial difficulty then.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, MattK said:

Do clubs pay more than they have to today? I don't believe they do. Swindon pays Nick Morris what they do because they presumably thing he is the best rider available at that average and price. If there was a better rider available for less money, then surely Swindon would sign them?

The idea of promoters sticking together is fine, but it completely ignores the fact that speedway is a competitive sport and clubs want to win. Clearly, making a loss is an acceptable price for putting together a competitive team because if it wasn't clubs wouldn't do it.

you always argue persuasively and i respect what you say but we simply can't go on like this and yet you seem to suggest thats exactly whats going to happen.What then can be done differently?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Fromafar said:

Squad system would be mine .

And where would the extra riders come from? There aren't enough to solve the doubling up problem at the moment, let alone provide a squad for each club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Fromafar said:

Reading between the lines in this weeks SS if the Premiership Promotions can get Team  to move up its sod the rest,but I get the impression that there's a few  Championship Teams in a bit of trouble financially.Looks like a bit of a stalemate  between leagues . No easy answer . A poll between fans would be Interesring.Personaly 1 league.

This would be financial suicide for a lot of Championship clubs, many of whom are struggling to afford running at Championship levels, never mind increasing costs to compete with the Premiership clubs. But as long as it pleases a few "elite" clubs, who cares?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How can One Big League result in a much higher outlay than the Championship currently costs to run? One "top " star per team ( if that is possible with the number of "top" stars about! ) I can only see One Big league as about the same as being at Championship level. If you take out  Doyle, Lambert, Fricke, Cook and don't use them unless they ride for a reasonable amount then you have no other World Class riders ( Kurtz & J Holder are of course Up & Coming. Nicholls and Harris are no longer where they were ( except in their odd best moments ). UK speedway for at least five years - while it TRIES to rebuild and attract new fans - does not need world class riders. All riders are heroes for racing but are worth only what the sport can afford in terms of paying customers. If sponsors will meet the additional financial needs of "top" riders, that is market factors coming in to play. If we go for more of the same ( of the last ten years ) further decline in terms of average crowds is the only outcome.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, ch958 said:

you always argue persuasively and i respect what you say but we simply can't go on like this and yet you seem to suggest thats exactly whats going to happen.What then can be done differently?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying everything is rosy, I just don't believe that one big league is the solution. It will be seen as a major weakening for Premiership teams, which is the approach tried for the last decade (with inevitable consequences) and I believe will result in a cost increase for Championship teams. Frankly, I don't think tinkering with the league structure will do anything to attract fans.

For me, the problem is the way in which the sport is promoted. Clubs seem to rely on a combination of BT Sport, local media, social media and word of mouth. The problem with the first three is that you are largely preaching to the converted. The only people who will watch speedway on BT Sport, read about it in the local news and follow speedway related social media are people who already have a passing interest in the sport. The problem with word of mouth is that I don't believe it is persuasive enough to get people to part with £17 to "try out" speedway.

I think clubs need to try a lot harder to get speedway in front of people so they can experience it first hand. The approach I would take is to appoint speedway ambassadors who work at major local employers or who have some other access to large numbers of potential customers. Each ambassador has twenty free tickets per meeting to offer to people who don't regularly attend speedway. The tickets would include entry, a pre-meeting pit walk, the chance to watch a couple of heats from the centre green and a discount voucher for the next meeting.

If 10 ambassadors bring 20 newbies each meeting and just half return for the discounted meeting (say £9 entry) and 10% return longer term this would create 300 new fans per season and generate almost £50k in additional revenue. The cost to the clubs is minimal as the people being offered free tickets wouldn't be attending without them.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MattK said:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying everything is rosy, I just don't believe that one big league is the solution. It will be seen as a major weakening for Premiership teams, which is the approach tried for the last decade (with inevitable consequences) and I believe will result in a cost increase for Championship teams. Frankly, I don't think tinkering with the league structure will do anything to attract fans.

For me, the problem is the way in which the sport is promoted. Clubs seem to rely on a combination of BT Sport, local media, social media and word of mouth. The problem with the first three is that you are largely preaching to the converted. The only people who will watch speedway on BT Sport, read about it in the local news and follow speedway related social media are people who already have a passing interest in the sport. The problem with word of mouth is that I don't believe it is persuasive enough to get people to part with £17 to "try out" speedway.

I think clubs need to try a lot harder to get speedway in front of people so they can experience it first hand. The approach I would take is to appoint speedway ambassadors who work at major local employers or who have some other access to large numbers of potential customers. Each ambassador has twenty free tickets per meeting to offer to people who don't regularly attend speedway. The tickets would include entry, a pre-meeting pit walk, the chance to watch a couple of heats from the centre green and a discount voucher for the next meeting.

If 10 ambassadors bring 20 newbies each meeting and just half return for the discounted meeting (say £9 entry) and 10% return longer term this would create 300 new fans per season and generate almost £50k in additional revenue. The cost to the clubs is minimal as the people being offered free tickets wouldn't be attending without them.

At Bradford they would visit a different school every week and on race day they would transport the kids to the track, show them around the pits, explain everything and then after the first race a kid turned to me and said "is that it"? They then chose to run about the place making a total nuisance of themselves and few if any ever came back, in fact Bradford had the best team in the country, a good track and piles of silver wear but by the time it closed the place was embarrassingly empty. So imagine your idea should work, after a handful of meetings the new spectator has seen all the teams in the league and Chris Harris seemed to ride for most of them, he's been covered in dust to the extent that he couldn't see across the track and he's seen two overtakes and 88 processions. I had been a spectator from the 1950s, later a sponsor and sometimes mechanic, I introduced lots of my friends to the sport, none of them go now and I only know one who watches it on TV (and he travelled the world to big meetings, such was his initial enthusiasm). The product is now the problem, tracks that are inaccessible to anyone who relies on public transport, tracks badly prepared, bikes that are unnecessarily dangerous, same riders week after week, no matter which team it's supposed to be and a bad lack of continuity. Having said all that, I suppose anything is worth a try but I haven't seen anything new in the offing that hasn't already failed. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, foamfence said:

At Bradford they would visit a different school every week and on race day they would transport the kids to the track, show them around the pits, explain everything and then after the first race a kid turned to me and said "is that it"? They then chose to run about the place making a total nuisance of themselves and few if any ever came back, in fact Bradford had the best team in the country, a good track and piles of silver wear but by the time it closed the place was embarrassingly empty. So imagine your idea should work, after a handful of meetings the new spectator has seen all the teams in the league and Chris Harris seemed to ride for most of them, he's been covered in dust to the extent that he couldn't see across the track and he's seen two overtakes and 88 processions. I had been a spectator from the 1950s, later a sponsor and sometimes mechanic, I introduced lots of my friends to the sport, none of them go now and I only know one who watches it on TV (and he travelled the world to big meetings, such was his initial enthusiasm). The product is now the problem, tracks that are inaccessible to anyone who relies on public transport, tracks badly prepared, bikes that are unnecessarily dangerous, same riders week after week, no matter which team it's supposed to be and a bad lack of continuity. Having said all that, I suppose anything is worth a try but I haven't seen anything new in the offing that hasn't already failed. 

I agree about promoting speedway to kids. It is a waste of time. Speedway has nothing to offer youngsters. The target market is over 40 and that's who clubs should be trying to attract.

As for the product being the problem, I don't agree. Could it be better, of course. However when I watch meetings from the 70s and 80s there is no more passing or closer racing than you see today. Yes there are the occasional shocker meetings (Swindon's TV meeting against Leicester) but these are the exception rather than the rule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MattK said:

I agree about promoting speedway to kids. It is a waste of time. Speedway has nothing to offer youngsters. The target market is over 40 and that's who clubs should be trying to attract.

As for the product being the problem, I don't agree. Could it be better, of course. However when I watch meetings from the 70s and 80s there is no more passing or closer racing than you see today. Yes there are the occasional shocker meetings (Swindon's TV meeting against Leicester) but these are the exception rather than the rule.

I never mentioned things being better, what I was getting at was that people have got wise to what a pile of **** it really is. As for the target being over 40s, well everything I seem to read suggests that youth is the target. Things might not have been better in the old days but if you ask the majority of oldies down at the track, they say they preferred it back then but still go through habit and to catch up with friends and of course the off chance of a good race.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree with the lack of promotion and advertising but when they get to the stadium the product should at least be credible and not select teams. One division for me but it doesn't seem there's the will. Oh well, more nails in the coffin I'm sad to say

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MattK said:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying everything is rosy, I just don't believe that one big league is the solution. It will be seen as a major weakening for Premiership teams, which is the approach tried for the last decade (with inevitable consequences) and I believe will result in a cost increase for Championship teams. Frankly, I don't think tinkering with the league structure will do anything to attract fans.

For me, the problem is the way in which the sport is promoted. Clubs seem to rely on a combination of BT Sport, local media, social media and word of mouth. The problem with the first three is that you are largely preaching to the converted. The only people who will watch speedway on BT Sport, read about it in the local news and follow speedway related social media are people who already have a passing interest in the sport. The problem with word of mouth is that I don't believe it is persuasive enough to get people to part with £17 to "try out" speedway.

I think clubs need to try a lot harder to get speedway in front of people so they can experience it first hand. The approach I would take is to appoint speedway ambassadors who work at major local employers or who have some other access to large numbers of potential customers. Each ambassador has twenty free tickets per meeting to offer to people who don't regularly attend speedway. The tickets would include entry, a pre-meeting pit walk, the chance to watch a couple of heats from the centre green and a discount voucher for the next meeting.

If 10 ambassadors bring 20 newbies each meeting and just half return for the discounted meeting (say £9 entry) and 10% return longer term this would create 300 new fans per season and generate almost £50k in additional revenue. The cost to the clubs is minimal as the people being offered free tickets wouldn't be attending without them.

Suggested something similar to a Promoter about 20 years ago...

He spent the next two minutes after my suggestion working out how much it was going to cost him in 'lost revenue' by giving away free and discounted entry over several weeks...

That would be 'lost revenue' that wasn't actually there in the first place because the people being targeted were those that were never attending....!!!

He also was concerned that these tickets could end up being received by fans who actually did attend and this would hit income...

I tactfully tried to explain that given the fact that as more than 99.9% of the 2.5 million people living less than 45 mins away don't attend, it was probably 'not too likely' many actual fans would gain from it but obviously there may be an odd one..

Bottom line is that the sport in a team guise (in the UK), is a busted flush...

And has now gone too far to ever get credibility to be regarded as 'proper' by national mainstream media and treated seriously by them.

And without that coverage crowds can never improve...

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its good to see the stars of the sport at league level but I'd not be worried if they didn't ride to keep costs managable.     I want to watch a tight match with good close exciting riding.  Who is under the helmet makes no diference to me at league level.      The second tier racing is often better than Premier.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I can see if there is a money takes in the PL league is more teams wanting to ride in the CL, which is better for that league if it brings more teams into it.

lets see how long the PL lasts in that situation, if they do it for next season we will see how many teams are left to apply to join the CL in 2020 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy