Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
racers and royals

Transponders and qualifying times introduced in GP’s in 2019

Recommended Posts

I'm all for it,we need to move on,most other motor sports use the same system.How do they know in advance which gate is the best?How do they know how the track is prepared for a GP compared to qualifying? They don't.

Also it could lead to practice/qualifying on live tv,as in most other motor sports.Sometimes as exciting to watch as the actual racing.

Speedway is stuck in a time warp,most fans are middle age to elders and want things to stay as they are,I myself am 68 but think this is a good idea,we need to move on.

I'd love to see transponders used in league meeting too,when non speedway people ask me how do we time races and I say a bloke with a stop watch they cannot believe that in this day and age.

Bring it on.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, blocktread said:

I'm all for it,we need to move on,most other motor sports use the same system.How do they know in advance which gate is the best?How do they know how the track is prepared for a GP compared to qualifying? They don't.

Also it could lead to practice/qualifying on live tv,as in most other motor sports.Sometimes as exciting to watch as the actual racing.

Speedway is stuck in a time warp,most fans are middle age to elders and want things to stay as they are,I myself am 68 but think this is a good idea,we need to move on.

I'd love to see transponders used in league meeting too,when non speedway people ask me how do we time races and I say a bloke with a stop watch they cannot believe that in this day and age.

Bring it on.

Practise in Formula One is vital. Fastest car gets an advantage on the grid.  But you're saying speedway riders don't know the best gate in advance nor how the track will ride. 

So what's the point of the timed practice day if there is no advantage to be gained on race day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mark said:

Practise in Formula One is vital. Fastest car gets an advantage on the grid.  But you're saying speedway riders don't know the best gate in advance nor how the track will ride. 

So what's the point of the timed practice day if there is no advantage to be gained on race day.

BECAUSE the riders want it. Maybe of no interest or value to fans (including the likes of me) but riders will take note of who is doing what. It is in their nature. They are speed merchants. Who is the fastest matters to them, not in terms of the actual meeting, but almost as a matter of pride. It's in their dna. Once had a heated discussion with Tony Rickardsson at the only FIM Gala Dinner I have attended. He was an ardent fan of transponders. Believed that everyone was interested in times. Tried to argue that fans don't care whether a race lasts 59.0, 59.2 or 59.8 seconds. It is the entertainment provided in the race no matter its duration that matters. He wasn't convinced... by a long way!

And, of course, transponders will have a value on race-day. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Mark said:

Past stats are probably worthless.  They give the winning gate but there is no record of who was leading after the first bend.  That must be a better indictor of which gate was the best for starting.   Many riders come from behind to win a race - but this doesn't make there gate the best option.

So you would plump for 2 outside gates at Krsko ? obviously with stats being worthless. At  some tracks there are grave yard gates. All the riders know them

Edited by iwright71

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PHILIPRISING said:

BECAUSE the riders want it. Maybe of no interest or value to fans (including the likes of me) but riders will take note of who is doing what. It is in their nature. They are speed merchants. Who is the fastest matters to them, not in terms of the actual meeting, but almost as a matter of pride. It's in their dna. Once had a heated discussion with Tony Rickardsson at the only FIM Gala Dinner I have attended. He was an ardent fan of transponders. Believed that everyone was interested in times. Tried to argue that fans don't care whether a race lasts 59.0, 59.2 or 59.8 seconds. It is the entertainment provided in the race no matter its duration that matters. He wasn't convinced... by a long way!

And, of course, transponders will have a value on race-day. 

Got no problem with transponders  being used just not this Mickey Mouse qualifying system which some weeks some riders won't even be there to participate in

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't really get the negativity (typical speedway mentality tbh), this can surely have no negative effects? It just makes the practice session that little more interesting.

As it stood your starting number was a completed lottery and if you got the graveyard gate twice you was hampered from the start. At least now riders can do something to affect their starting positions. Let's not forget they are still choosing 24 hours before the event so even first pick won't guarantee the best gate twice, much like getting last pick might not guarantee a graveyard twice (krsko last four picks are gonna be a nightmare).

Really all it is, is a bit of added fun for the event. I ve yet to do a GP and not go to practice as for me it's all part of the experience. Picking the 3 or 4 fastest riders to have a flutter on then find none of them make the semis a day later....

A bonus championship point, and a cash prize should be enough to ensure everyone goes flat out, moving forward.

I don't really see how riders can finish just behind a rival to pick gate choice in their head to head. Times over 1 lap will be so close that the slightest roll out the throttle would see you fall from the front to the very back. In the example given a few pages back Zmarzlik would need to manage to finish a place or two behind Tai to gain any real chance of having an advantage.

As I say I don't see it doing any harm, just gives extra interest to the Friday session.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, PHILIPRISING said:

BECAUSE the riders want it. Maybe of no interest or value to fans (including the likes of me) but riders will take note of who is doing what. It is in their nature. They are speed merchants. Who is the fastest matters to them, not in terms of the actual meeting, but almost as a matter of pride. It's in their dna. Once had a heated discussion with Tony Rickardsson at the only FIM Gala Dinner I have attended. He was an ardent fan of transponders. Believed that everyone was interested in times. Tried to argue that fans don't care whether a race lasts 59.0, 59.2 or 59.8 seconds. It is the entertainment provided in the race no matter its duration that matters. He wasn't convinced... by a long way!

And, of course, transponders will have a value on race-day. 

I asked for an advantage of timed practise.   Riders wanting it is a preference but I can't work out what advantage it gives them.  Reckon when they spend a few Friday's watching a tractor grade the track after each one minute time trial they'll soon get fed up.    Agree with the use on race day fopr close finishers or jumping a start. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mark said:

I asked for an advantage of timed practise.   Riders wanting it is a preference but I can't work out what advantage it gives them.  Reckon when they spend a few Friday's watching a tractor grade the track after each one minute time trial they'll soon get fed up.    Agree with the use on race day fopr close finishers or jumping a start. 

BECAUSE riders feel that it helps them determine the performance of various bikes. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, iwright71 said:

So you would plump for 2 outside gates at Krsko ? obviously with stats being worthless. At  some tracks there are grave yard gates. All the riders know them

You are right.    I should have said stats on most tracks are worthless as a couple of trappers paradise tracks will have a large bias.    But I still stand by the point that only recording who wins a race and from which gate is worthless in any race where over taking has been seen.     

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So !   When its a close finish its the rider who gets his ponder over the line first who wins and not the rider who gets his front wheel over first...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Dornier fixer said:

So !   When its a close finish its the rider who gets his ponder over the line first who wins and not the rider who gets his front wheel over first...

If you are using the transponders to decide close finishes it has to be 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

If you are using the transponders to decide close finishes it has to be 

will have to be exactly same placement on every bike.   maybe on the front wheel cover providing they are all standard  length      I foresee a big can of worms being opened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, PHILIPRISING said:

BECAUSE riders feel that it helps them determine the performance of various bikes. 

And that's where it falls down.  This makes an almighty assumption that everything else on the comparable laps stayed the same i.e. the path of the bike around the track, the way the rider controlled the throttle, the wind resistance (which includes rider body and head positioning).   I think if they could be made for false starts, results of races and to give fans MPH figures of riders at set points on the track then that would bring value to fans but I see them of limited value to riders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Mark said:

will have to be exactly same placement on every bike.   maybe on the front wheel cover providing they are all standard  length      I foresee a big can of worms being opened.

If you mean a mudguard, that could fall. Not sure if its a direct disquali for that though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, f-s-p said:

If you mean a mudguard, that could fall. Not sure if its a direct disquali for that though.

where will the transponder be fitted to make sure everyone gets the same deal ?   if the referee is using the transponder to determine who wins in a close finish it opens a can of worms if two bikes have a transponder fitted in a different position on each bike.   

For recording individual lap times it could be put anywhere on the bike.  Assume the timing starts when the transponder goes over the start line by sending a signal to a fixed point and the same happens to finish the lap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy