lastword 200 Posted September 5, 2019 Just now, ArthurRudge said: Natalie Quirke's hair looks fkn awful who advises her on it What the hell has her hair got to do with anything? Pathetic post! 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Midland Red 2,383 Posted September 5, 2019 I couldn’t do her job - but I don’t think N Q is really very good Brandon is embarrassing on screen, may well do a good job behind the scenes Tatum is ok, knowledgable and has strong points of view, and can be amusing Pearson is . . . . best not say! Rowe and Goddard are poor but an improvement on Pearson Ermolenko is actually quite amusing as you await his standard mis-pronunciations and odd phrases And the foreign lady interviewer is probably very nice, but why is she used? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
waytogo28 2,054 Posted September 5, 2019 9 minutes ago, Midland Red said: And the foreign lady interviewer is probably very nice, but why is she used? Friends in high places I have heard said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OveFundinFan 4,137 Posted September 5, 2019 43 minutes ago, Midland Red said: I couldn’t do her job - but I don’t think N Q is really very good Brandon is embarrassing on screen, may well do a good job behind the scenes Tatum is ok, knowledgable and has strong points of view, and can be amusing Pearson is . . . . best not say! Rowe and Goddard are poor but an improvement on Pearson Ermolenko is actually quite amusing as you await his standard mis-pronunciations and odd phrases And the foreign lady interviewer is probably very nice, but why is she used? Seems like you wouldn’t approve of anyone. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
geoff100 1,420 Posted September 5, 2019 56 minutes ago, Midland Red said: I couldn’t do her job - but I don’t think N Q is really very good Brandon is embarrassing on screen, may well do a good job behind the scenes Tatum is ok, knowledgable and has strong points of view, and can be amusing Pearson is . . . . best not say! Rowe and Goddard are poor but an improvement on Pearson Ermolenko is actually quite amusing as you await his standard mis-pronunciations and odd phrases And the foreign lady interviewer is probably very nice, but why is she used? Brandon does a great job! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HGould 2,213 Posted September 5, 2019 Quirke is very poor when compared to Sophie Blake Sophie Blake is adequate when compared to Suzi Perry Perry ultimate Motor Sport professional and speedway fan BTW anyone remember when Julia Bradbury did it??... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steve roberts 9,242 Posted September 5, 2019 36 minutes ago, HGould said: Quirke is very poor when compared to Sophie Blake Sophie Blake is adequate when compared to Suzi Perry Perry ultimate Motor Sport professional and speedway fan BTW anyone remember when Julia Bradbury did it??... I seem to recall she covered Channel Four's (?) edited version of the Grand Prix with expert Sam Ermolenko? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skidder1 7,632 Posted September 6, 2019 Brando is the 'floor manager of choice' for a very wide selection of televised sports so maybe wouldn't be able to commit.? Bring back Charlie Webster I say!! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bruno 1,790 Posted September 6, 2019 Tbh Charlie was better than the woman on the gps Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
f-s-p 832 Posted September 6, 2019 42 minutes ago, bruno said: Tbh Charlie was better than the woman on the gps Are you lot talking of Kiri Bloore, the blonde that has a bigger mic than she is? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Terry 1,319 Posted September 6, 2019 Nowt wrong with Nat, Nige and Kelv. They do a grand job. They need to get a second rider in the studio with Scott though, you need a different perspective, instead of them just agreeing with each other. I remember the early days of the gp's with Keith Huewen, with Wiggy, Briggo, PC and Tatum. Now THAT was a panel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buttons 370 Posted September 6, 2019 6 hours ago, bruno said: Tbh Charlie was better than the woman on the gps What Charlie (How important was it for you to win that race) Webster, no thanks 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
waytogo28 2,054 Posted September 7, 2019 The biggest problem that Kiri B has is that she does not think about the level of English many foreign riders have ( non native English speakers ). She does not put her questions in graduated English and thus there is often a non comprehension response ( eye action and body language ) which Kiri is unaware of. You can hear and see that some riders just give their own answer which is not related to her questions in any way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
screm 8,050 Posted September 7, 2019 10 hours ago, Buttons said: What Charlie (How important was it for you to win that race) Webster, no thanks Dont see Charlie returning to speedway, she has moved on and up, proving she must've done something right to get the kind of presenting jobs she is doing these days. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
screm 8,050 Posted September 7, 2019 17 hours ago, bruno said: Tbh Charlie was better than the woman on the gps Not quite sure what your expecting, whoever is doing the rider questions has only a short time and probably only a couple of questions, I mean she isn't there to open a debate. I've seen some of the longer interviews Kiri Bloore does on the SGP page and Twitter and I think she does a good enough job. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
