Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Recommended Posts

With apologies if this has been dredged over already and this isn’t a snide or dig 

what is the ruling that allows a facility for Smetana? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We were given an extraordinary 7 day facility which has expired. 

There is no facility now, we have to use a NL rider at No 2 until either Smetana can get here or another rider is approved.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, daz9100 said:

We were given an extraordinary 7 day facility which has expired. 

There is no facility now, we have to use a NL rider at No 2 until either Smetana can get here or another rider is approved.

Cheers 

Bickley and Bowtell are Championship riders though so is it up to a certain average or level? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, gmuncie said:

Cheers 

Bickley and Bowtell are Championship riders though so is it up to a certain average or level? 

Poole couldn't revert to their previous team due to the rider being dropped signing for another team.

Sensible getting a facility (unless someone knows why the rider isn't in the country).

A silly rule is when you can get a rider who has an average about 3 points higher than the rider they are replacing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rule this year is you can use a guest with an average 25% under the Riders average so Smetana is on a 5 so Poole can use anyone with an average under 3.75

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Fozzie4388 said:

The rule this year is you can use a guest with an average 25% under the Riders average so Smetana is on a 5 so Poole can use anyone with an average under 3.75

I've not seen that, can you cite the regulation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Fozzie4388 said:

The rule this year is you can use a guest with an average 25% under the Riders average so Smetana is on a 5 so Poole can use anyone with an average under 3.75

Correct. It was quoted by Danny Ford in his public explanation of the Smetana situation after the initial 7-day facility was finished.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, arnieg said:

I've not seen that, can you cite the regulation?

Its another new rule without telling the fans.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Skidder1 said:

Correct. It was quoted by Danny Ford in his public explanation of the Smetana situation after the initial 7-day facility was finished.

Is this actually a rule or have the management committee just permitted it citing special Covid circumstances?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, eric i said:

Its another new rule without telling the fans.

It's been in place since 2020 to stop teams having to field a NL rider if their no.1 is missing

 

 

Screenshot_2021-07-25-22-19-28-51_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg

Edited by Marshall07
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/25/2021 at 3:15 PM, eric i said:

Its another new rule without telling the fans.

It's not a new rule. It's just never been used before.

I think the argument comes from the fact Poole have signed a ghost on an assessed average of 5.00 to replace the outgoing assessed 4.00 meaning a difference in 0.5 in obtaining a guest. If the 4.00 average was used Poole would only be allowed a 3.00 replacement under this regulation.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/25/2021 at 10:17 PM, Marshall07 said:

It's been in place since 2020 to stop teams having to field a NL rider if their no.1 is missing

 

 

Screenshot_2021-07-25-22-19-28-51_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg

So we have a rule/reg that grants a facility for the no facility scenario :rofl:

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

So we have a rule/reg that grants a facility for the no facility scenario :rofl:

There's always been a rule stating how a rider is to be replaced should none of the other facilities (and that list is long) be appropriate.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Technik said:

It's not a new rule. It's just never been used before.

I think the argument comes from the fact Poole have signed a ghost on an assessed average of 5.00 to replace the outgoing assessed 4.00 meaning a difference in 0.5 in obtaining a guest. If the 4.00 average was used Poole would only be allowed a 3.00 replacement under this regulation.

 

The no facility rule used to be NL rider only, this is a new rule. I just wish the BSPA would issue a statement when they change the rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy