Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

It may be about right but I would still say it should therefore be declared that he has been assessed that way as opposed to using the 2011 average

That way if another rider returns to the league after such a long break he can be reassessed fairly rather than a precedent having been set  of using such an old average

It's not just about NP but thinking a few steps ahead as to how someone else may use such a decision to manipulate a future change to gain unfair advantage

 

Very good point.

Iversen came back in on 7.38, which was too low for a GP standard rider.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

You are probably right but using an average that is 9 years old is crazy IMO

I agree, but it’s a fair average for ability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DC2 said:

 

Very good point.

Iversen came back in on 7.38, which was too low for a GP standard rider.

All returning GP standard riders should be minimum 8. In Iversens case he is a regular UK league rider unlike some who use the league to suit themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, stevebrum said:

All returning GP standard riders should be minimum 8. In Iversens case he is a regular UK league rider unlike some who use the league to suit themselves.

 

Are you saying Iversen should have returned on an 8 or kept 7.38 because he has been relatively loyal to the GB leagues?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DC2 said:

 

Are you saying Iversen should have returned on an 8 or kept 7.38 because he has been relatively loyal to the GB leagues?

It should be 8 for any returning GP standard rider,  just pointing out the unfairness to some riders who race here regular. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Rockstar99 said:

Thoughts?

1. Brady Kurtz 7.54
2. Jack Holder 7.49
3. Josh Grajczonek 7.29
4. Chris Holder 7.16
5. Aaron Summers 4.87
6. Dimitri Berge 4.14
7. Ricky Wells 4.00

Team Total 42.49
Remaining 0.01

crap:unsure: and highly unlikely. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(1) Jack Holder 7.49

(2) Josh Grajczonek 7.29

(3) Nick Morris 5.38

(4) Erik Riss 6.61

(5) Charles Wright 6.52

(6) Ryan Douglas 4.66

(7) Broc Nicol 4.00

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

or

(1) Nicki Pedersen 8.61

(2) Kyle Howarth 5.58

(3) Josh Grajczonek 7.29

(4) Sam Masters 7.35

(5) Charles Wright 6.52

(6) Dimetri Berge 4.14

(7) James Shanes 3.00

Masters and Pedersen lining up in the same would be very interesting.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or even

(1) Nicki Pedersen 8.61

(2) Charles Wright 6.52

(3) Chris Harris 6.01

(4) Erik Riss 6.61

(5) Adam Ellis 6.33

(6) Ricky Wells 4.00

(7) Broc Nicol 4.00

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, DC2 said:

 

Are you saying Iversen should have returned on an 8 or kept 7.38 because he has been relatively loyal to the GB leagues?

It's obvious that Iversen had to come back on his 7.38 average,as this is what he attained last season.When was the last time he missed a full season?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(1) Matej Zager 7.48

(2) Erik Riss 6.61

(3) Ryan Douglas 4.66

(4) Troy Batchelor 8.82

(5) Charles Wright 6.52

(6) Ricky Wells 4.00

(7) Tomas H Jonnsson 4.18

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, spin king said:

(1) Matej Zager 7.48

(2) Erik Riss 6.61

(3) Ryan Douglas 4.66

(4) Troy Batchelor 8.82

(5) Charles Wright 6.52

(6) Ricky Wells 4.00

(7) Tomas H Jonnsson 4.18

pie in the sky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy