Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
jrs

Covid-19 Are we being told the truth ?

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Vincent Blachshadow said:

Quite. 

So has information about the pre-Christmas 'party' at No 10. That wasn't deemed to be in the public interest for nearly a year. Why, after a year of unimportance, did it become a 'news' item we all needed to know about? That should have been consigned to a bin marked 'history'.

Same as the garden party. Why are you now considered important enough to know about it after more than six months of being kept in the dark?

I have one question about all this cr*p. Why weren't we informed at the time they happened? And I know the answer - they're only important when we can use them for muck-raking! They're not 'news items', they're manure forks!

 

It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
6 minutes ago, Tsunami said:

It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings.

I am not so sure. I think it might be Klaus Schwab and Big Pharma doing this because Boris hasn't locked down again and handed out free horse paste to the minnions :D 

  • Haha 6

Share this post


Link to post
4 hours ago, Vincent Blachshadow said:

Quite. 

So has information about the pre-Christmas 'party' at No 10. That wasn't deemed to be in the public interest for nearly a year. Why, after a year of unimportance, did it become a 'news' item we all needed to know about? That should have been consigned to a bin marked 'history'.

Same as the garden party. Why are you now considered important enough to know about it after more than six months of being kept in the dark?

I have one question about all this cr*p. Why weren't we informed at the time they happened? And I know the answer - they're only important when we can use them for muck-raking! They're not 'news items', they're manure forks!

 

The problem for Boris is the number of breaches, and if he sacks some civil servants to attempt to save his skin, i can imagine even more will come out

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
16 minutes ago, Tsunami said:

It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings.

Agreed, he must be behind quite a lot of the information, but that doesn't mean its not important

We haven't heard the last, and eventually definite proof will be shown to show that Johnson knew about something that breached the rules, maybe after the "independent" report comes out

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
47 minutes ago, Tsunami said:

It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings.

Strange that everyone believes Cummings, the same Cummings who the majority disbelieved when he drove to Bernard Castle.

 

 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, Star Lady said:

Strange that everyone believes Cummings, the same Cummings who the majority disbelieved when he drove to Bernard Castle.

 

 

Don't think he likes that Carrie pulls the strings and he was surplus to requirements. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
11 minutes ago, Star Lady said:

Strange that everyone believes Cummings, the same Cummings who the majority disbelieved when he drove to Bernard Castle.

 

 

A can't believe that guy had to tell that story 'in the garden',,, think he knew exactly what was going on?

A think the story would've been more believable if he was driven to Durham in an ambulance, with Matt Hancock driving it!!!

Edited by ruffdiamond

Share this post


Link to post

Protect the children. Stop this madness now...

 

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post

Up to date UK Government data on vaccine injuries. At least 247 children have been so significantly injured by this vaccine that a medical professional or parent has been moved to report it to Government. It's just the tip of the iceberg...

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
8 minutes ago, Blupanther said:

Up to date UK Government data on vaccine injuries. At least 247 children have been so significantly injured by this vaccine that a medical professional or parent has been moved to report it to Government. It's just the tip of the iceberg...

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting

 

Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18 years old

The MHRA closely monitors the safety of COVID-19 vaccine exposures in individuals under 18 years old, including Yellow Card reports for COVID-19 vaccines used in this age group.

To date there have been an estimated 3 million first doses and 0.9 million second doses of the COVID-19 Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine given to under 18s, approximately 11,600 first doses and 10,000 second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca given to this population and 21,500 first doses and 16,000 second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna given to individuals under 18.

The MHRA has received 2,471 UK reports of suspected ADRs for the COVID-19 Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine in which the individual was reported to be under 18, 248 reports for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, 16 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and 11 where the brand of vaccine was unspecified.

The experience reported in under 18s is similar to that identified in the general population and a review of these reports does not raise any additional safety topics specific to this age group.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

This charmer voted to take £20 UC from the disabled and poor. And while people freeze due to huge energy costs, it's reported that he claimed £5,822 to heat the stables on his 32 acre estate. The level of hypocrisy in this government is beyond words...

Image

Edited by Blupanther
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
3 hours ago, Tsunami said:

It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings.

Play it whiter than white and you don’t have a problem……

Share this post


Link to post
3 minutes ago, dj350z said:

Play it whiter than white and you don’t have a problem……

Well it's worked for some for a long time now, I give you Tony Blair.

Share this post


Link to post

You must be getting it now:o

 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy