Tsunami 10,098 Posted January 17 3 hours ago, Vincent Blachshadow said: Quite. So has information about the pre-Christmas 'party' at No 10. That wasn't deemed to be in the public interest for nearly a year. Why, after a year of unimportance, did it become a 'news' item we all needed to know about? That should have been consigned to a bin marked 'history'. Same as the garden party. Why are you now considered important enough to know about it after more than six months of being kept in the dark? I have one question about all this cr*p. Why weren't we informed at the time they happened? And I know the answer - they're only important when we can use them for muck-raking! They're not 'news items', they're manure forks! It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings. 3 Share this post Link to post
iris123 14,423 Posted January 17 6 minutes ago, Tsunami said: It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings. I am not so sure. I think it might be Klaus Schwab and Big Pharma doing this because Boris hasn't locked down again and handed out free horse paste to the minnions 6 Share this post Link to post
The Third Man 1,902 Posted January 17 4 hours ago, Vincent Blachshadow said: Quite. So has information about the pre-Christmas 'party' at No 10. That wasn't deemed to be in the public interest for nearly a year. Why, after a year of unimportance, did it become a 'news' item we all needed to know about? That should have been consigned to a bin marked 'history'. Same as the garden party. Why are you now considered important enough to know about it after more than six months of being kept in the dark? I have one question about all this cr*p. Why weren't we informed at the time they happened? And I know the answer - they're only important when we can use them for muck-raking! They're not 'news items', they're manure forks! The problem for Boris is the number of breaches, and if he sacks some civil servants to attempt to save his skin, i can imagine even more will come out 1 Share this post Link to post
The Third Man 1,902 Posted January 17 16 minutes ago, Tsunami said: It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings. Agreed, he must be behind quite a lot of the information, but that doesn't mean its not important We haven't heard the last, and eventually definite proof will be shown to show that Johnson knew about something that breached the rules, maybe after the "independent" report comes out 1 Share this post Link to post
Star Lady 5,275 Posted January 17 47 minutes ago, Tsunami said: It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings. Strange that everyone believes Cummings, the same Cummings who the majority disbelieved when he drove to Bernard Castle. 6 Share this post Link to post
Badge 4,658 Posted January 17 4 minutes ago, Star Lady said: Strange that everyone believes Cummings, the same Cummings who the majority disbelieved when he drove to Bernard Castle. Don't think he likes that Carrie pulls the strings and he was surplus to requirements. 1 Share this post Link to post
ruffdiamond 5,714 Posted January 17 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Star Lady said: Strange that everyone believes Cummings, the same Cummings who the majority disbelieved when he drove to Bernard Castle. A can't believe that guy had to tell that story 'in the garden',,, think he knew exactly what was going on? A think the story would've been more believable if he was driven to Durham in an ambulance, with Matt Hancock driving it!!! Edited January 17 by ruffdiamond Share this post Link to post
Blupanther 19,410 Posted January 17 Protect the children. Stop this madness now... 4 1 Share this post Link to post
Blupanther 19,410 Posted January 17 Up to date UK Government data on vaccine injuries. At least 247 children have been so significantly injured by this vaccine that a medical professional or parent has been moved to report it to Government. It's just the tip of the iceberg... https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting 1 Share this post Link to post
iris123 14,423 Posted January 17 8 minutes ago, Blupanther said: Up to date UK Government data on vaccine injuries. At least 247 children have been so significantly injured by this vaccine that a medical professional or parent has been moved to report it to Government. It's just the tip of the iceberg... https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting Suspected side effects reported in individuals under 18 years old The MHRA closely monitors the safety of COVID-19 vaccine exposures in individuals under 18 years old, including Yellow Card reports for COVID-19 vaccines used in this age group. To date there have been an estimated 3 million first doses and 0.9 million second doses of the COVID-19 Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine given to under 18s, approximately 11,600 first doses and 10,000 second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca given to this population and 21,500 first doses and 16,000 second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna given to individuals under 18. The MHRA has received 2,471 UK reports of suspected ADRs for the COVID-19 Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine in which the individual was reported to be under 18, 248 reports for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, 16 for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and 11 where the brand of vaccine was unspecified. The experience reported in under 18s is similar to that identified in the general population and a review of these reports does not raise any additional safety topics specific to this age group. 1 Share this post Link to post
Blupanther 19,410 Posted January 17 (edited) This charmer voted to take £20 UC from the disabled and poor. And while people freeze due to huge energy costs, it's reported that he claimed £5,822 to heat the stables on his 32 acre estate. The level of hypocrisy in this government is beyond words... Edited January 17 by Blupanther 3 1 Share this post Link to post
dj350z 1,889 Posted January 17 3 hours ago, Tsunami said: It's because Cummings is stoking the fire, on a controlled release, to extract as much damage as he can over a longer period. There's a phrase about a "woman scorned" and it seems in this case it is a 'man'. It may be now appearing in the Mail these days, but it is because of the promptings of Cummings. Play it whiter than white and you don’t have a problem…… Share this post Link to post
Tsunami 10,098 Posted January 17 3 minutes ago, dj350z said: Play it whiter than white and you don’t have a problem…… Well it's worked for some for a long time now, I give you Tony Blair. Share this post Link to post
