lisa-colette 6,022 Posted December 14, 2021 1 hour ago, Wee Eck said: Solid choice of rider. Give him decent equipment and he’s just what’s needed PS lisa-collette: you can’t use your joke now Well, not yet anyway! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted December 14, 2021 (edited) A very decent team. Will make the playoffs no doubt. But Ostergaard is at the tail end of his career and had an injury. Might take him a little while to get back to where he was, or close to it. But this is countered by the expected improvements of Basso and Brennan, who I believe will have a breakthrough season. Cook and Nicol the other two. Cook not the rider he was a few seasons ago but still a good scorer at home. Looking at this team against the expected Poole lineup is interesting. Glasgow go with two ageing heat leaders against Poole’s three ageing heat leaders. Glasgows second strings are more solid than Poole’s, but Poole might have a stronger reserve than both Glasgows. (Unless Danyon continues his improvement) Roll on 2022 and another great season like the last. Edited December 14, 2021 by Steve Shovlar 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Noelinho 920 Posted December 14, 2021 Really pleased to see Ulrich back. I don’t really care how he performs at this point. He was so good this year he deserves the chance to find out. He was such a joy to watch. Couldn’t be having him just walk off somewhere else. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaizer 2,863 Posted December 14, 2021 Looks a good side on paper. Should be top 3 looking at teams already announced and rumours of those that haven't. Berwick look good dependant on final signing, Poole no doubt be up there, Oxford too. Plymouth, Leicester, Edinburgh be in around play off picture. Can't wait to April!! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bagpuss 10,778 Posted December 14, 2021 Despite not matching the heat leader power Poole will no doubt shell out for I think this will be the team to beat, the bottom four is far better than anyone else will come up with and there is loads of scope for improvement across the majority of the team. Could be that first league title that the Glasgow promotion deserve for their hard work. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted December 14, 2021 12 minutes ago, Bagpuss said: Despite not matching the heat leader power Poole will no doubt shell out for I think this will be the team to beat, the bottom four is far better than anyone else will come up with and there is loads of scope for improvement across the majority of the team. Could be that first league title that the Glasgow promotion deserve for their hard work. If you throw enough money at a team, some of it will stick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Blobby 2,658 Posted December 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, Steve Shovlar said: If you throw enough money at a team, some of it will stick. Watch you’ll have the happy clappers after you now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve Shovlar 10,439 Posted December 14, 2021 1 minute ago, Mr Blobby said: Watch you’ll have the happy clappers after you now. I am just joshing. Already said they have a good team next season. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eric i 617 Posted December 14, 2021 Whats Broc's average then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaizer 2,863 Posted December 14, 2021 5 minutes ago, eric i said: Whats Broc's average then? 5.50 I believe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eric i 617 Posted December 14, 2021 Just now, Jaizer said: 5.50 I believe Does his average need to be adjusted to remove Eastbourne scores? 1) C.cook 8.69 2) Ostergaard 7.82 3) Tom Brennan 6.03 4) Ben Basso 5.00 5) Broc Nicol 5.50 6) Danyon Hume 4.88 7) Connor Bailey 4.17 total 42.09 There must be a mistake in the above averages if this is the team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Weeyin 1,022 Posted December 14, 2021 8 minutes ago, eric i said: Does his average need to be adjusted to remove Eastbourne scores? 1) C.cook 8.69 2) Ostergaard 7.82 3) Tom Brennan 6.03 4) Ben Basso 5.00 5) Broc Nicol 5.50 6) Danyon Hume 4.88 7) Connor Bailey 4.17 total 42.09 There must be a mistake in the above averages if this is the team. Tom Brennan is 5.88 with reduction and I believe Broc is 5.45 after eastbourne results removed 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eric i 617 Posted December 14, 2021 1 minute ago, Cookiefan said: Tom Brennan is 5.88 with reduction and I believe Broc is 5.45 after eastbourne results removed Where do you get the averages from? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Weeyin 1,022 Posted December 14, 2021 Just now, eric i said: Where do you get the averages from? Not on the bspa site as they have not updated final gsa, but I can't reveal my source , sorry 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Weeyin 1,022 Posted December 14, 2021 14 minutes ago, eric i said: Does his average need to be adjusted to remove Eastbourne scores? 1) C.cook 8.69 2) Ostergaard 7.82 3) Tom Brennan 6.03 4) Ben Basso 5.00 5) Broc Nicol 5.50 6) Danyon Hume 4.88 7) Connor Bailey 4.17 total 42.09 There must be a mistake in the above averages if this is the team. You haven't given Tom the 2.5 % reduction Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
