Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Lenny Lion

Leicester vs Mildenhall 21/5/22 7:00pm

Recommended Posts

LEICESTER LION CUBS
1 Dan Thompson 10.17 
2 Mickie Simpson 3.62 
3 Connor Coles 6.04 
4 Tom Spencer 5.53 
5 Joe Thompson 8.52 (C) 
6 Kai Ward 3.00 
7 Vinnie Foord 3.00 

MILDENHALL FEN TIGERS
1 Jason Edwards (c) 8.84 
2 Sam Bebee R/R 5.16 
3 Jack Kingston 4.44 
4 Alex Spooner 6.40 
5 James Shanes 8.66 
6 Josh Warren 3.00 
7 Luke Muff 3.00

 

Teams copied from Leicester website.
 

No doubt about it Mildenhall are stronger with Shanes in the team & it will be a tough match but I think Leicester will just have too much for the Tigers

Cubs 50-40 Tigers is my prediction. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Binman said:

Why RR in NDL give the rides to an unattached rider

Agreed. Maybe limit the use of RR to twice a season per side to cover for last minute emergencies etc but otherwise unattached guests. In fairness until the actual rules are changed it will remain. I would think RR still makes Mildenhall weaker.

Home track specialists to take this but Shanes and Warren could mix it up a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Sings4Speedway said:

Agreed. Maybe limit the use of RR to twice a season per side to cover for last minute emergencies etc but otherwise unattached guests. In fairness until the actual rules are changed it will remain. I would think RR still makes Mildenhall weaker.

Home track specialists to take this but Shanes and Warren could mix it up a bit.

I thought Warren looked quite decent for Kent at Leicester last season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Elmo said:

I thought Warren looked quite decent for Kent at Leicester last season.

Apologies to Josh put the mockers on him it appears. Dominant home side, disappointing debut for Shanes who shows that his gating still really isn't up to any decent level. Hope the injuries aren't too serious. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprising that Shanes couldn’t touch the Thompson twins. It really shows how dominant they are at home at this level. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meeting decided when Ward twice knocked off Warren in Heat 2 - the second time, causing an injury that forced Warren to withdraw from the meeting.

Not sure how it can be an unsatisfactory start when one rider loses control coming out of the second bend and causes the other two to fall.  Had the ref made the correct decision there, then Ward wouldn't have been in a position to again upend Warren in the second re-run of the race.

Mildenhall very unlucky tonight.

Decent enough meeting - quite enjoyed it as a neutral, even with the bizarre refereeing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, lucifer sam said:

Meeting decided when Ward twice knocked off Warren in Heat 2 - the second time, causing an injury that forced Warren to withdraw from the meeting.

Not sure how it can be an unsatisfactory start when one rider loses control coming out of the second bend and causes the other two to fall.  Had the ref made the correct decision there, then Ward wouldn't have been in a position to again upend Warren in the second re-run of the race.

Mildenhall very unlucky tonight.

Decent enough meeting - quite enjoyed it as a neutral, even with the bizarre refereeing. 

Where did you watch the racing from because that crash took place just in front of me & there was no contact between Ward & Warren . It was a pure racing incident where Warren & Foord collided & all 3 was a fair call.

Could equally say if Warren had not locked up infront of Ward in the re-run they wouldn’t have had the 2nd crash. These guys are in experienced & need the track time so they will make mistakes . 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Lenny Lion said:

Where did you watch the racing from because that crash took place just in front of me & there was no contact between Ward & Warren . It was a pure racing incident where Warren & Foord collided & all 3 was a fair call.

Could equally say if Warren had not locked up infront of Ward in the re-run they wouldn’t have had the 2nd crash. These guys are in experienced & need the track time so they will make mistakes . 

Watched from the first bend, where you've above the action and have a good view. Ward clearly lifted out of the second bend, badly lost control, and caused Warren and Foord to fall.  He was the sole cause of the stoppage - yet it was somehow called as "an unsatisfactory start". 

As I said I was there as a neutral, but felt for Mildenhall, when the incident that really cost them tonight (the withdrawal of Warren) was caused by a rider who shouldn't even been in the race at that point.  Very perplexed spectators on the terraces. 

Edited by lucifer sam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was on the backstraight exactly where the riders collided. Yes Ward lifted but at no point hit Warren or cut across his path so I don’t see how Ward lifting & Warren crashing are in anyway connected.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Lenny Lion said:

I was on the backstraight exactly where the riders collided. Yes Ward lifted but at no point hit Warren or cut across his path so I don’t see how Ward lifting & Warren crashing are in anyway connected.  

On the raised first bend viewing, it was noticeable that Ward drifted wide after lifting, and caused the other two to clash. The report on the Leicester website confirms that it was:

"an ugly collision involving the three remaining riders on the second bend, resulting in Josh Warren and the Cubs’ Vinnie Foord going heavily into the fence."

I was struggling to see how Ward had not been excluded for it, along with everyone else around me, and then Ward (who IMO should not still have been in the race) tried a daft last bend lunge up the inside of Warren in the second re-run and put Warren out of the rest of the meeting. 

Of course, these are young lads and nothing was on purpose, but it was very hard not to feel sympathy for Mildenhall, who lost because a key rider (their better reserve) was taken out of the meeting by a Leicester rider, who shouldn't have even been in the race at that point! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Lenny Lion said:

Where did you watch the racing from because that crash took place just in front of me & there was no contact between Ward & Warren . It was a pure racing incident where Warren & Foord collided & all 3 was a fair call.

Could equally say if Warren had not locked up infront of Ward in the re-run they wouldn’t have had the 2nd crash. These guys are in experienced & need the track time so they will make mistakes . 

 

11 hours ago, lucifer sam said:

Watched from the first bend, where you've above the action and have a good view. Ward clearly lifted out of the second bend, badly lost control, and caused Warren and Foord to fall.  He was the sole cause of the stoppage - yet it was somehow called as "an unsatisfactory start". 

As I said I was there as a neutral, but felt for Mildenhall, when the incident that really cost them tonight (the withdrawal of Warren) was caused by a rider who shouldn't even been in the race at that point.  Very perplexed spectators on the terraces. 

 

11 hours ago, Lenny Lion said:

I was on the backstraight exactly where the riders collided. Yes Ward lifted but at no point hit Warren or cut across his path so I don’t see how Ward lifting & Warren crashing are in anyway connected.  

Just shows how difficult the refs job is in real time I suppose, I've slated them before as we see what we want to see to a point.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/20/2022 at 5:40 PM, Binman said:

Why RR in NDL give the rides to an unattached rider

Last year they changed the guest rules, so you had to use an unattached rider, but that was abandoned after one season & are allowing guests again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, szkocjasid said:

Last year they changed the guest rules, so you had to use an unattached rider, but that was abandoned after one season & are allowing guests again.

Rules dropped after a year...unheard of! 

Sadly the unattached route is slightly flawed (especially when unattached riders get an average after 4 meetings). 

Personally id rather see RR saved for emegencies and either guests (-x% of missing averaged rider) or use unattached but be able to re-order the side and promote a reserve to the 1-5 for the meeting .... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy