I would say more than two steps back.
Ok so gp riders and riders missing for 12 months are 9. what about some of these up an d coming U21 stars, what figure will be plucked out of the air for them?
Swindon were on a loser anyway, either Doyle or Morris had to be sacrificed, whoever it was wouldn't have been happy, I expect chapman is doing cartwheels.
Ridiculous decision, let's just hand the WC to a rival, boost their attendances and lower ours, talk about a double whammy, guess we'll be feathering someone else nest with a loan fee unless Rosco has a real rabbit up his sleeve.
Probably slurring their words, was going to vote on only rider whose a mate, but came out as 8. Surprised the pissed up buffoons came up with a decent points limit.
The motivation to only allow 1 rider of 8 strikes me to be born out of spite, and to drag the top teams down to the bottom, Swindon could quite easily have a stronger top two using up less points, appears like a hasty decision with little thought.
We could have JD/PK or JD/MZ or JD/TW probably stronger combos than JD/NM, using up less points within the 42.5 limit, most likely be a 12th hour rule change saying only 1 current GP rider, you would think those that voted for this silly rule would prefer Swindon to burn points on JD/NM than potentially having two top line GP riders.
Must be as Musielak likely to get nod over Bellego, Heeps & THJ no thanks.
Hopefully: Doyle, Ellis, Musielak, Zach = 25.83 add PK perhaps.
Would Adam and Zach get 2.5% reduction?
Should be as many as you like whilst still 6 behind, limited to one t/s per rider, although I wouldn't include ht14 as the make up is similar to the excluded ht8,