Not Blinkered

A compromise is not common sense in this situation. The BSPA run this sport, or are supposed to, not Sandhu or Frost. Sandhu or Frost threw their toys out the pram, so a compromise would be allowing to partially get their way, which should not be how things work. A compromise would be a dangerous precedent to set for future years.

If the BSPA have backed downb, even to compromise then it sets a worrying precedence for other promoters to throw their toys out the pram in future AGMs to get what they want. If Sandhu as backed down and accepted the AGM rulings then fill credit to him for seeing sense.

They are entitled to earn a crust, one assumes that they are working hard behind the scenes not just on race days, so of course they deserve a decent salary, nobody can be expected to work for nothing. So the only thing the Louis can be slated for is if they are not doing the jobs they are paid for.

If true, which based off his own public comments earlier this year suggests it might be, but if if it is true then Woffinden can feck off back to Aussie and I will cheer anyone, but Wuffy, Wuffy, Wuffy in the future.

That does not make sense though, it is almost saying to a rider, don't worry, you don't have to perform to be guaranteed a place next season. Many GP newbies have had average seasons, but shone through at times, Emil, Holder, and even Chris Harris did so perhaps deserved their second chances, but Tai has not really shown any glimpses of being good enough at all this season and nearly always looked off the pace. So whilst I hope he makes it back in a season or two, and shows what he is capable of, I don't think his performances justify a place next season.

Very few people would dispute that, but Lady Lucks been offensive more than once about Harris, and to suggest he will dine out on this success for years to come is totally disrespectful. Harris has more than shown he has guts and determination after that crash Monday night and whilst some people may not think he is WC material, he is deserving of our respect.

You really are a nasty piece of work, this is the second anti Chris Harris crap I have seen you post this week.

Exactly, we all know Pearson has his favourite riders who he sucks up to (Crump, Hancock and whoever is doing well at the time), such a shame twice in recvent GPs he has felt the need to point out Bomber has been in so few GP finals overall. Full credit Chris Harris for a superb season.

What rubbish, he has shown in the latter part of the season that he deserves to be there and if he fails on Saturday then reaching a couple of finals this season suggests he is good enough for the mix.

Funny, I never saw any duplicated thread about the ref bottling the decision earlier, yet my thread was removed. Someone else started a thread for Chris Harris, fair and justified, and yet you seemingly have removed that too.

Good to see the mods going OTT tonight and merging all the threads. A lovely thread for Chris Harris deleted or merged. Pathetic.

Why have you merged my thread with the Poole Coventry thread. My topic was about the ref bottling the decision, and not relevant to the Poole thread as such.

Fair enough, thank you for clarifying, he is not an idiot on this occasion.

Are the rules different for international speedway, SGP and SWC compared to domestic British speedway? I have always watched speedway with the result always awarded if there is a crash on the last lap where the result was not in doubt, the ref awards the race. Yet tonight and during the SWC on last lap incidents that idiot Pearson keeps waffling on about 'was the leader of the race across the line when the red light came on'. Now I will take the idiot comment back if the rules are different for international speedway than domestic British speedway?

Amazing.. this thread is about the Croatian GP and yet some idiots on here are still bashing Harris for his performances in other GPs. Harris was superb all day, dropping just two race wins out of 7 races. FFS give the man some credit.