BROCK

Yes I do. He rode with his usual aggression on a very tricky track. Got himself in some good positions only to make a mistake and lose it. Plus of course he is a bit race rusty. He will probably be better at Poole, But of course I hope not.

Has it not been said that Pawlicki was told to ride by his club although injured. Did not score very many points did he. Any rider however fit if possible will ride in a GP challenge meeting.

Perhaps SCB meant Horton as he had less wages to pay out. Well he said he was fit. Who am I to call him a liar. No I would not want him riding as a pirate under any circumstances. Yes I do know he rode for us a few years ago at Easty

Yes I am a Poole supporter, Have been for over 55 years. So you are saying that, as you say Poole have allegedly cheated in the past it is OK for others to cheat now. I did not say Cov had cheated, I was saying that some Cov supporters wanted them to.

Yes but that was purely tor choice of guest for an injured rider, not to replace a fit rider because he might be better. As you say Barker did ride so they did not cheat. .But there are a few on here saying they would prefer Fricke ride instead of Barker who is a Cov rider. Fricke is not.

But Fricke is NOT your rider, Barker is . another Bee's fan try to cheat Poole are using guests because they have to. Not because they want to.

When Barker was interviewed he did not say he was unfit or in pain. He said he was ok, just not scoring points, but no lack of effort. Are you suggesting you drop a team member who is declared fit, to bring in a guest, to try and gain an advantage. Surely that would be cheating, Wouldn't it? Is it not better to use your own riders wherever possible and NOT use guests.

Not blustering just stating what might have happened as you are

Poole didn't call it off.l.If they had carried on Poole may have won by more

It is easy to say he didn't want it off after it was, makes him sound better

And you came on here earlier today saying it should have been called off earlier at Poole last night. Make your mind up

Gavan I would have thought every Poole supporter would have liked the meeting to be called off after heat 10. as Wendy said. I suspect KL wanted to carry on as the scores were very close and could have possibly won. I personally think the track was dangerous and could have been called before the end. But you and I know that this forum would have gone into meltdown if it had been.

I expect they will water the track well, this afternoon and make it nice and deep

I posted this before reading further down. So yes I apologiise

Is that so. Surely Cov would not object seeing they had Harris and Garrity at our track yesterday.

Is that you saying, WELL DONE POOLE. You moan when its called of after heat10. You moan when the meeting is allowed to run its full course. You are a hard person to please

But was the original date put back because some clubs had not completed their home fixtures for whatever reason. If they were I am sure you will know, and you would probably know the teams. As you seem to be quite good at the facts and figures Sory to post twice as first post did not seem to work

Were the original play off dates put back or not?. If they were he is not telling lies. You should know as you are the man for dates and figures. You probably know the tracks concerned. By the way we are having a rain shower in Poole

But weren't they put back because some clubs could not complete their fixtures. Correct me if I am wrong

I await ten pages of put downs, probably started by SB or Gavan. Although they might hold back now I have mentioned it.

You are talking like a bloody kid (just saying)

If as you say only the people at the track new what went on why do you keep insisting that covers should have been used when you weren't anywhere near the stadium and new nothing of the track condition. At least I live in Poole, new what the weather was like and was at the stadium at 5-30 and could see the work going on. As for the weather we have had one hell of a lot of rain over the last few days with little or no sun to dry the track and as I stated on a previous post it rained most of sunday night and has since rained all day. and is still raining now. I will sign off now as I have to get on with my life, and can't be arsed to respond to any more trolls

You are obsessed with them that's all you seem to bleat about. If the covers are put down on a sodden track all it would do is sweat and make it just as bad. The rain would run down the top of the covers and puddle against the inside line and back up under the covers, but of course you would know this being a track expert,

You do talk an absolute load of tripe. Were you there?, did you witness what went on during the afternoon, no of course you weren't.. You and many others are just stiring for the sake of it. I suppose when this thread dies someone will start another to keep it going. By the way it rained all last night and has rained all day in Poole so the track is probably waterlogged, and with more rain forccast for Wednesday I can't see it being on then

Like the ELRC or is that different because it was not at Poole . By the way why was it postponed seems strange especially as it was on Sky and the track wasn't waterlogged. But KL wasn't the same they had about two hours of rain before the meeting, not eight hours of rain, and they have the advantage of being able to blade off the track onto the centre because it is concrete and the same level as the inside line with no raised curb for the water to collect. As regard to Swindon they had track covers.