You have literally just explained why the rider should not have been excluded. If you cross a line, you are going over it, not touching it. The only logical explanation from that quoted rule is that the bile has to be completely over the line. that's what "crossing the line" means. Take football as an example. If the entire ball is not over the line then the ball is still in play. Same principal. Congratulations to Poole Pirates on their legitimate title win. This has even less legs than Don King's "long count" invention when Mike Tyson got hammered by Buster Douglas. Anyone else got any other sporting examples to add to the "bad loser" file?

Might as well jump on the bandwagon. Had rather hoped we might be able to persuade Morris up the road but that’s not to be. Time for Paco to move on although I think on his average he’ll be retained.  Keep: Kye, Jordy, Mitch Lose: Dan, Paco Not bothered either way: Grahn, Sedgy Bring in: Victor P    

My general question is: Why is it always Poole at the centre of any cheating? Surely enough is enough now or are the rule makers being swayed by something??

Dry this morning and the forecast is for a dry day.

That's just your interpretation.  You are saying that touching the white line ( inner edge) equates to crossing the inner edge.  I think you could equally interpret that regulation as crossing requiring the machine to be completely beyond the inner edge.  And, on either situation, the regulations do not make clear which part of the wheel ( or tyre) has to cross the inner edge.  Commonly we interpret that as the part of the tyre in touch with the ground, but the regulation doesn't actually say that.  Another regulation that any competent lawyer would drive a coach and horses through. 

If the points limit stays the same, what do we think Plymouth line up will be??