phillipsr

WFH not a thing at BSI then....

Theres a shock

You asked for people opinions then cant handle it when there different to yours... you really are an idiot

Sidney doesn't care about things like averages, Drabik, Smektala, Chugunov and Kubera are all ahead the first three are a decent way ahead based on last year

So you were out at the seaside and are now complaining about others at the seaside...

Swindon Sheffield Peterborough Wolves Kings Lynn Belle Vue Ipswich

Stevebrum strikes again!!

Because the NL should be for either young upcoming riders who are looking to progress or older riders who can pass on knowledge not perennial 4pt riders. Its not Newcastles fault or Wallingers but he shouldnt be allowed near the NL

Nothing personal but he is exactly the sort of rider who shouldn't be in the NL!! In this instance he's doing Newcastle a favour but its ridiculous they have had to turn to him and then be 5pts under the limit

Ive never liked Hancock but theres no doubting his achievements. I personally wont miss him from the sport but he is a legend of it

Think that would acceptable to most.

7 hours ago, szkocjasid said: Wallinger is 3.87, the Gems are more than 5 points under the limit now! Which is a ridiculous situation caused by the BSPA.. I was critical of Clegg being able to ride NL but thank god he is or the Newcastle team would be worst than the Scunny team from a few years ago which was criticised for damaging other peoples businesses

Whats his average? Are they not also about 3.5 points under the points limit?

As has been said before its right that pricing reductions should be aimed at the younger generation and not OAPs.. Kent are to expensive but the idea of charging OAP’s more isnt a bad one

Horrible to start thinking about this but Rob is going to have to start thinking about who comes in.. what points are available and who’s out there? Maybe a Zaine Kennedy?

Someone hasnt got a sense of humour

remember certain comments you made about Nicki Pedersen... not sure you are one to listen to on what rumours might come true

So we can ignore averages? in that case its an awful team should of gone with 1. Woffinden 2. Lindgren 3. Madsen 4. Doyle 5. Zmarlik 6. Dudek 7. Sayfutdinov to be serious I haven't seen anyone say that the Wolves team isn't good just that it was stupid to build 2pts under the limit which there is no argument for.. it is a good team but it should and could of been stronger at it was stupid not to make it so

Never truly been at the very top of the sport.. not a particularly exciting rider to watch and doesnt bring the x factor that Pedersen brings..

Who? Even if it is Iversen hes not a big name

Its a bang average Belle Vue team... no number one in there at all..

Realistically Sarjeant isnt going to get better.. NL should be for riders who are on an upward curve not riders looking for easy pay days.. i dont agree with Ledwith either for whats it worth.. as far the experience thing what have riders like Clegg/Sarjent achieved in the sport that would make them worth listening to.. id rather see riders like Flint etc at Newcastle

Another rider who shouldnt be anywhere near the NL

Sorry but Why should they? No one owes Poole Speedway anything

It was but he is at best 4th choice id even argue he shouldn't be that high.. so yes he is an option but there are better