Yeah, I did comment on something along those lines earlier on,,, dunno about moving Birmingham north, or Leicester, depends on where they draw the line on the map.
I was also bearing in mind some comments on the 'fours' thread, which I think Steve has just highlighted.
They might want to wait until they know who'll be taking part first.
A suppose they could do a quick reccy and if someone does drop out, they could give them to someone else who might want to take part
Or even 4 or 5 southern teams doing it.
They shouldn't mess around with the fundamental rules of a league tho
Would it have not been possible to give all teams 2 home and 2 away fixtures (22 meetings) and scrap the CS ?
and BTW, a noticed you didn't say '6 northern teams',,, do you know something and not wanting to say?
I agree(just about), although I think 'enotian' does have a valid point/s. I don't think it right to guarantee 3 teams from each section of qualification. However if a team decides not to run, might it upset the balance of teams per section which will lead to further problems.
With the new league format giving a team 16 home league matches, at least 1 koc and at least 2 CS. I wonder if it could be a carrot for negotiating with landlords?... More fixtures would bring more continuity for fans also, which might help.
With the 'extension' and being a Sunday track, the promotion are probly on the back foot from the start, so as far as building a team is concerned, were probly unlikely to attract any 'top' riders. Unless we can catch one on the way down of course.
Yes but maybe that's why the post office is still open?
It's only a pound, but that's not the point, it's about principle. In some folks minds, less means less.
That's fine and, am sure your not alone.
I would give it a go, if it was the only option available. Sometimes you've gotta smash it all to bits before you get it right
A think the problem we have is the fact that the track is not fully available and, the rent of course.