One of my favourite memories of Michael was turning up for a Rye House press day and finding him sitting in the ref's seat operating the starting gate for the sessions. As always I found him quiret and friendly although obviously a lost soul.
I cannot condone drug use and certainly not dealing but the guy paid a heavy price for his mistakes. Nor can I condone failing to meet his commitments to supporters but I could sympathise with Michael's frustrations with the sport and watched with profound sadness as his voice became one in the wilderness, as his protests and frustration took him down the wrong road.
In the end he made an enemy of the speedway authorities. One day he let them have their opportunity to exact their revenge with catastrophic results for the rider and arguably the sport.
You cannot help but feel that with the right guidance and support he could have let that talent flourish instead of being stifled.
Sometimes it is safer for a rider not to have an opinion or rebel. Sadly some cannot do it effectively and constructively.
Did Michael let the sport down or was it the sport that let him down? I suspect that both sides had serious faults in this case.