Alan_Jones

He only did 3 home and 5 away so missed out on a real average.

Josh Bates definitely(NL), Chris Harris probably(CL), Rory Schlein maybe(CL via patriality).

...for riders new to the league. Whether intended or not, it leaves the door open for riders who previously qualified through patriality to return to the league.

The current (2018) rule specifies riders new to the NL so those that qualified previously by patriality wouldn't be new to the league so should qualify. With regard to ambiguity of the AGM PR, it's already come to light that although the NL was specified, it extends back to the CL years as well. No doubt if you asked two promoters the situation, you'd get at least three different answers. It may be sorted out by March 15th, or not...

No. The AGM PR said that the 3 point minimum has to be achieved not assessed.

The Final issue of Green Sheets is at http://www.speedwaygb.co.uk/request.php?429

OK. Got that wrong. I wasn't looking at the C column on the previous issue, so we still don't know if Morris, BWD, etc. get the reduction.

See my edit above. I was wrong.

No, those are the reduced figures. Edit: My mistake. I wasn't looking at the C column on the previous issue. They are still the unreduced figure.

If the 2018 rule is still in place then riders with 2 averages from the same season use the one appropriate to the league they're riding in. If they are from different seasons then the latest one is used, converted if necessary.

So we now know that it isn't all ex-NL/CL riders that get the 2.5% as was stated in the AGM PR. The Aussies & Kiwis that rode in the patriality seasons miss out.

BWD should get the 2.5%.

If this year's rule is retained then the average gained in the league being ridden in is used.

She's on the list but without a specific licenced role.

Lakeside & Scunthorpe only had 1 promoter each on the last published officials list (13/09).

That was a mistake. Although he was quoted in the newspaper article, the identity of the two teams was the opinion of a journalist who often makes stuff up.

...and possibly some Aussies and Kiwis who have started out in the NL.

Nicholls didn't.

Pretty obvious isn't it? The Sky money that was used to bribe Kings' Lynn and Leicester into propping up the league a few seasons ago isn't there any more so this time a more creative solution had to be devised.

And yet riders are allowed to make their own choice of used tyres, so not really an H & S issue, more like "It was your decision, not our fault". And even worse, if a rider decides his used tyres are a bad idea, he's not allowed to switch to a new tyre.

Ecclestone & F1 obviously although I must say I never realised it was an indoor sport.

There's no such rule.

Monday & Wednesday were the "set race days" agreed at last year's AGM. The problem was that the 2nd priority day agreed at the ISLB was Thursday. Whether that was before or after the AGM and why it was different is anybody's guess.

If any substantial changes are made then a re-inspection is needed, otherwise it's just a case of applying for a renewal.

When was the current one issued? They are valid for 3 years.