Ftr Reserves

[Aces51 2,778]

Have been interested to see the impact of the Elite Draft Riders, with some suggesting they have too much impact on match results

Taking EL matches only, and excluding double point tactical scores, the figures so far (e&oe) are as follows:

 

(no. of meetings; match score; EDR score; 1-5 score)

+/- +/- +/-

 

Coventry h 4 28 20 8

a 7 31 23 8

11 59 43 16

 

Poole h 4 26 11 15

a 4 9 10 -1

8 35 21 14

 

Kings Lynn h 5 70 1 69

a 5 -20 2 -22

10 50 3 47

 

Wolverhampton h 5 38 7 31

a 5 -55 -6 -49

10 -17 1 -18

 

Belle Vue h 4 14 -3 17

a 6 -40 3 -43

10 -26 0 -26

 

Leicester h 5 -12 -6 -6

a 2 -38 1 -39

7 -50 -5 -45

 

Swindon h 5 30 -3 33

a 3 -52 -17 -35

8 -22 -20 -2

 

Lakeside h 6 61 -21 82

a 6 -90 -22 -68

12 -29 -43 14

 

It highlights those teams with the strongest 6 and 7s, and also gives an insight into the performances of the top fives

It must be me and I've only looked at Belle Vue but their overall points difference after 10 matches is -15 not -26.

[Midland Red 2,383]

Apologies! BV is incorrect by 10 points

Revised chart;

 

(no. of meetings; match score; EDR score; 1-5 score)
+/- +/- +/-

Coventry h 4 28 20 8
a 7 31 23 8
11 59 43 16

Poole h 4 26 11 15
a 4 9 10 -1
8 35 21 14

Kings Lynn h 5 70 1 69
a 5 -20 2 -22
10 50 3 47

Wolverhampton h 5 38 7 31
a 5 -55 -6 -49
10 -17 1 -18

Belle Vue h 4 24 -3 27
a 6 -40 3 -43
10 -16 0 -16

Leicester h 5 -12 -6 -6
a 2 -48 1 -49
7 -60 -5 -55

Swindon h 5 30 -3 33
a 3 -52 -17 -35
8 -22 -20 -2

Lakeside h 6 61 -21 82
a 6 -90 -22 -68
12 -29 -43 14

 

It doesn't alter the EDR figures

It's 1 different from your figures as I exclude the double-points, as explained so Leicester at home is taken as 55-35, Coventry at home 39-51, Kings Lynn away as 40-50

Apologies, once again, for the error (I did say e&oe!)

Edited May 19, 2015 by Midland Red