we would love some of the top u21s in the league, but lets be real, we will be looking at    rasmus karlsson mitch mcdairmid viv muddle pawel sitek possibly tate zischke if he still counts as an u21 rider, he turns 22 next year   and riders like that   ideally we would want   bailey pawelczak nagel pedersen malkeiwiecz andersson  

lets look at options,   rushen in poland so couldnt do it batchelor -you would moan   MPT - injured   RR - not worth the risk

Maybe with two U21's needed next season, it was a "sweetener"?..😁

Doesn't look like it  Discretion and Review Timeframe: A referee has full discretion to review an incident before the result is officially declared. They can consult with assistant officials, review track side evidence, or take a moment to evaluate a crash before making their final call, but that power effectively freezes once the result is locked into the official score sheet. [1, 2, 3] The Post-Meeting Appeal Process: If a team believes a rule was broken or a gross misjudgment occurred, they cannot force the referee to change it during the meeting. Instead, the club must lodge a formal, written appeal with the SCB after the meeting concludes. However, even during an official post-meeting appeal, changing the actual recorded on-track result is incredibly rare due to anti-retrospective rules. 

But is there scope in the rules for a ref to alter the result of a completed race? Take for example also recently when a race started and was completed with two riders off the wrong gates, the race was run and even though the mistake was later picked up on, nothing was done. What would happen if a race was completed and no one noticed that it had been completed with a rider that had no dirt deflector, or wrong helmet colour until afterwards? 

That guest MM booking was absurd.