Relieved I went with my head and not my heart and didn't sign up for the two legged BSN special.  I feel sorry for BSN as the Premiership product doesn't do them justice.  Championship speedway far more entertaining.

Not really Zmarzlik or Lambert paired with Woryna wouldn’t be much different to what Doyle & Emil cost.  

Quite agree, tonight he was very poor, top rider in the championship but not in the premiership and did not seem that bothered, when the camera was on him in the pits he was on his mobile joking, this is not the attitude of a team captain, he should of been finding out why he was too slow to pass Tate.

Ignore any suggestion from Google Gemini, it’s just how their AI is trying to interpret the rule. It’s just generated words and those words are not pulled from the rulebook directly. The actual rule is in the statement, it’s pretty clear too. Inner edge where the white line starts. Hence a part of the wheels have to be touching the track to be safe  

Weren't you riding in the era of Frank Smart and Roger Lobb being tested in the same week and failing? They were no random drug tests thats for sure, a certain fellow Welshman had a big hand in getting them caught and fined. And rightly so.

The Google search definitions are very clear but I've still yet to see where they are officially written within the SCB rule book. Nobody has yet pointed me in the right direction.  The SCB statement says "having reviewed the regulation as written, this has been breached. Well okay, reviewed against what, by who and where's the evidence?  Did someone at the SCB Google it too? Because as far as I can see, the rules 'as written' are subjective in interpretation. I'm not saying it's wrong, but I can't see anything to back it up. The Google search quoted says "according to SCB regulations the white line is technically Part of the infield and defines the precise racing boundary as where the dirt meets the outer edge of the white paint. Where do the SCB regulations state this? And why does it say 'formula scout' after it?  At the end of the day, I have no axe to grind either way. To be honest, towards the end of it, Scunny had won me over with their tenacity and I wouldn't have been upset if they'd won, but when people are saying that this vague SCB statement is proof or make it a fact that the rule was breached, I'd like to see the proof. I'm looking forward to this week's Star. I hope they can put more meat on the bones.