lewy

No hes not eligible kyle hughes that is

Holub isnt riding at plymouth thursday scunny have rr at no1 and I suspect it will be rr at no1 at scunny friday! Could it be you been rumbled for breaking the rules and using a guest at no1 for a rider on an assessed average I hope you are not breaking the rules using a guest for lyager,or should it be a nl guest only unless hes competing in some event that qualifies the guest facility to be used,i dont know just asking the question and not getting any answers!! Maybe if scb reads this thread he could enlighten me as he/she seems pretty clued up

No you will have rr at no1 not an illegal guest,why is lyager missing obviously not injured ?

Well done ulrich,one of the best to watch in the pl on his day

Ipswich are in pole position for 6th place both scunny and ryehouse have strengthend up cant see the devils overhauling the witches i,m afraid but still a good season for us to even be in contention and not battling to avoid wooden spoon

Why no guest is it because of rule 16-5-2-2 ?

Seems strange ipswiches capt and no1 would risk leading his team in playoffs where he would probably earn more money than one meeting in poland!

If he got banned would ipswich be allowed to use a guest for him ?

What would he be banned from ? Pl matches or kc matches or riding in britain .

All the best cliffeboy we might meet in the playoffs!! How good would that be for westcountry speedway!!

The joke club was referring to a pathetic post earlier! As for kurtz he is an amazing talent if he gets back to his best he could win you the playoffs as for the devils if we do qualify we could cause a few surprises but its still a tall order to qualify!

Your still in pole position for 6 th place baldy that said just to be in with a shout of playoffs is an achievement for the joke club from devon :-) Time will tell I think raz may score a few more than lanham but lanhams experience could've been invaluable in the playoffs especially helping young kurtz who I think is feeling the pressure!

I know where your coming from cliffeboy but lanham had contributed considerably to your success thus far and possibly 5 matches before he was dropped scored a maximum,he also had upped his average by two pts so imo deseved a bit more loyalty,where as plymouth offered wright a chance which he failed to take so the change was made

Barker will be back in devon imo

No mate I think you quite like us

Thats a bit harsh lol!

The prick

James wright 12pts in 5 matches,eklof 10 in 1 match enough said!

It was a good meeting and newcastle actually got stuvk in but the devils atm are riding really well as a team

Where and when did they claim that? I would like to read it,thanks in anticipation.

Its going to go to the wire for sure whoever gets the final place I dont think 3rd place will relish the first stage of playoffs imo !!

Wd used the nice big loan fee we got for razmus but we had to wait for the cheque to clear :-) One big difference we changed a rider that dropped his average by 2 the rebs dropped lanham and he upped his by 2!

Maybe its a question of priorities?

I dont think its the number of meetings that's a problem I think he's feeling the pressure of being the rebs no1,alot of pressure for one so young he seems to score better when guesting of late

Plymouth replace james wright with linus eklof