PRESUMABLY they are asked because they have a format that covers all the bases. And even if they had a pretty good idea who the team was it doesn't that they chang.
What we do need is absolute transparency for every such decision. How it was arrived at and who sanctioned their findings.
ZAGAR as a wild card at Krsko only would satisfy BSI regarding Slovenia. Don't sense any great appetite to put him back in. Lambert far too inexperienced and would do his career more harm than good.
THAT isn't strictly true. I know of one adjudicator who makes assessments at the request of the BSPA but isn't told who the track requiring the information is.
I'M aware of that but IMG Russie said that they very much doubted the fees would be forthcoming and quoted other logistical problems and were generally not in favour.
Obviously OneSport have made light of those but don't think BSI/IMG had any real appetite to go there.
BUT the most influential voice on the MC is Chris van Straaten, who basically sanctioned a move that could potentially harm his own team's chances of reaching the final. Not sure Matt Ford can be blamed for that.
THE key figure could be Nicholls, the match winner at Lakeside. By his own admission hasn't gone as well as he would have liked at the NSS. If he can fire on all cylinders BV will be tough to beat.
WHO was available? And at least we had no guests in either meeting.
THINK Sky believe the result is a foregone conclusion so won't be giving it the full coverage and cost of an outside broadcast. Presume a bit like the races they showed from the NSS last Bank Holiday Monday.
BV will be peeved if they don't get their £10,000 broadcast fee.