Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Gazc

Members
  • Posts

    7,184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    79

Everything posted by Gazc

  1. Clears that paticular conspiracy theory up , now on to the next one .
  2. Unfortunate for Victor But Aarnio or BWD makes Newcastle stronger imho, doing what they think is best for the team is the way I see it.
  3. Must be a documentary they are doing on the town as it is BT that do speedway coverage.
  4. Kyle Bickley , just after he said there is only one club I want to ride for , and I would love to ride for Glasgow but there team is full but you never know .
  5. Statistically the Championship section of the BSF must have the most per head of people with ESP , after all they can all predict what would have happened had it been Cook and not Lawlor. Thing is they know the same as everyone else on here jacksh*t.
  6. Why are you , and were did I say I was , read some of the other posts about the absolute crap on the Glasgow thread. What a stupid assumption to make when it is plain for all to see , can you read?
  7. Can you really blame anyone with the constant bitching on here we wont forget but in the same breath we won't blame everyone else either. Ring any bells.
  8. To be fair they have made these dark winter evenings very amusing with there pathetic rambling's , who knows what goes through there heads. It is sad what has happened to Workington Speedway but the crap posted on here I couldn't care less about there fan's, not all as there are a few who are reasoned but some on here are a bit like the Scottish press , hate filled, obsessive agenda driven mentalists. They lay the blame at all and sundry look at the crap Scunthorpe fan's took of them last season and we still don't know the full story but they made there own assumptions.
  9. Yep Coventry always travelled in big numbers.
  10. Agree with that if, there is one team I would like to see being successful after my own it would be Berwick.
  11. Telling someone to do that your lot wouldn't do themselves.
  12. Checked gsoh for you , gobbledigook Sh*te on here.
  13. You can never say for certain but based on the professional manner the Glasgow owners carry out there business I would say it would be a resounding all would be treated the same. Regardless who it was , Paulco has always had the Cynical side to him .
  14. This and other posts about the decision made by our club at the weekend hammers home why you should never let hatred get in the way of the truth as this is what happens. That right Blobby.
  15. Any code of conduct and disciplinary procedure at any organisation should always be kept in house , the fact the Glasgow Management had to explain there decision on social media is rare but a sad reflection on the reasons they felt they had to. Inconsistent management is one that cannot be used to describe the Glasgow Promotion every single person employed at any level of the club know there duties and what is expected of them. And have no doubt it is not a case of being selective on who gets disciplined all would be treated the same , this unfortunate incident is down to Joe, it appears if he had accepted his error and apologised he would still be here. In his wisdom he decided to argue the fact with all and sundry it is down to him and him alone that he has lost his place, and have no doubt the same would apply to any of the other riders.
  16. You can speculate all you want but the facts are there for all to see , nobody can answer the question with any degree of certainty.
  17. Certainly, to be fair most is just speculation on here the statement has shed more light on things whether it had just accelerated things regarding Kyle possibly it did who knows but it is done now and Kyle is now signed.
  18. That is irrelevant though Kyle wasn't signed as Joe was still in situ. It was only after the incident that the ball would have been set in motion, so I would hazard a guess and say yes he would still have been relieved of his position regardless.
  19. Burning some spoons tonight let me translate for you we couldn't give a sh*t that plain enough for you. You really should lay of the drugs.
  20. Couldn't give a s*it personally so barking up the wrong tree once again. And tell me what fact's are you basing this assumption on if you care to enlighten us all. Who is it you support again I have forgot.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy