Grachan

Either that or get him on "I'm a Celebrity get me out of here"! And I'm only half joking.

The story is that he received the most votes one year, so they gave him second! There's also Bob Nudd - the fishing guy. He apparently got most votes one year but was completely ignored. So, taking that into account, I guess Briggo was lucky to get second.

It's not the Sports Personality of the Year. It's the BBC Sports Personality of the Year. Tai isn't a BBC personality. Far too much importance is put onto this contest in my opinion, especially since it became a phone vote - mainly because it once was relevant because BBC was the only channel I guess, so it once meant something. For Tai to get any recognition he needs to become a big household name, and despite what people like to think, that is something he isn't.

Lanning's commentry of the 1973 was incedibly biased. I don't think you can take much from it. His opinion on the Plech incident is nonsense.

Muller wasn't the shock winner people now like to think he was, I went on a coach trip to that final, and beforehand practically the whole coach thought he would win. My friend got him in the sweepstake and everyone else wanted to swap! 1983 was very much a limbo year. Penhall had retired and Nielsen and Gundersen were still on the way up. Muller was one of the favourites. I remember going to the 1976 final in Poland and he was pretty spectacular in that too. Was on course for 11 before his last race crash. Maybe won't be remembered as an all time great but just as worthy as riders like Loram and Havelock, if not more so.

If I remember rightly, I think it was 62-15, with Swindon even getting a 5-0 at one point. I think a 4-2 against Cartwright and a last place by David Ashby were the only times a Swindon rider got beat. I think it was either 23-55 or 25-53. Great one for me was Phil Crump's maximum against the might of Cradley Heath in 1983. We lost 29-49 but celebrated as if we had won the league.

Not sure what Belle Vue would think of it though.

Just for the record, this is taken from here: http://www.border.gov.au/forms/Documents/118.pdf "Application for Australian citizenship by descent - Step 1 – Eligibility If you were born outside Australia on or after 26 January 1949, you may be eligible for Australian citizenship by descent if at least one person who was your parent at the time of your birth was also an Australian citizen at the time of your birth. If your Australian citizen parent was a citizen by descent or full Hague adoption, then that parent must have spent at least 2 years in Australia before you make your application"

Even if they were Australian citizens (they may have been but they weren't automatically Australian citizens just because they lived there) Tai wouldn't be Australian because they weren't Australians when he was born. Therefore he would have had to wait to qualify by residency, which he could do if he lived there until he was 16. Then he wouldn't automatically have become Australian but would ave been eligible to apply. However, they moved back to the UK when he was 15, so he never qualified by that route either. I know people in this country who have moved here from overseas and since become British citizens. Their son, who was also born overseas, moved over with them. He cannot become a British citizen yet as he is only 14. How do you know they were Australian citizen? They weren't when he was born anyway, even if they were later. You don't automatically gain a country's citizenship just because your parents take it on after you are born.

Nick Morris has a British parent and a British passport. How does Tai quaify as an Australian?

So can you explain how he was eligible to ride for Australia? I've looked but can't find a way he is Aussie.

So if Greg is a second string but has a higher average than Nick, who is a heatleader, who rides in the heatleader position in the team?

He'd still be entitled to that anyway, even if he had dual nationality. It is based on your passport, not which speedway team you ride for.

How many times do people need to be told? He is not British for his own convenience. He is British because he was born here to British parents. That's it. British. Not sure how it is convenient to him. He doesn't ride in our league. Greg Hancock was also acting in a similar manner when the USA anthem was played. He chooses to live in Sweden. Is he Swedish? No. He is American. And nobody questions it. Tai is not, in any way, Australian. If he was he wouldn't need a visa to go there.

In this current climate, any initiative that encourages a certain section of fans to stay away is a bit stupid really.

Even with a low points limit, the best teams tend to get to the top by choosing the best available riders on certain averages. The rest are then left to pick over what is left, and it can mean having an uninteresting side that struggles. You can bet that whatever the points limit, the likes of Poole, Swindon and Coventry are going to be near the top come the end of the year - and two of those sides are in danger of not being around much longer. But other sides need to be kept competitive in this era of low crowds and team struggling to survive financially. The points limit can make quite a difference at the moment with the league losing top riders every year.

On the BSPA site they are all listed as 3.00, so it will be a slight gain from that. Not much, though, if it's as you say. Don't worry. Everyone might get a chance to nick someone from Swindon's side half way though the year if a house appears on the back straight..

I thought it was a bit high too, although if the reserves are getting converted averages it counteracts it slightly. But if riders are dropping out of the UK then it may cause problems for some clubs. Leicester, for example, could struggle. Then again - do we really need total equality at the start of the year? I remember a time when a good old 60 point thrashing over 13 heats was seen as great entertainment.

The BSPA site has them all at 3.00!

Does anyone know for certain what averages Wright and Nielsen are coming in on?

Has he? Didn't he say, when interviewed at the Grand Prix, that he only had a 3 month visa for Australia? Why would he need a visa if he had an Australian passport? I'm not fabricating anything. Why do you say I am fabricating stuff? I looked it up. These are the rules for Australian Citizenship. http://www.beyderwellen.com/immigration-questions/2.html#FAQ2 "Q2: How do I become an Australian Citizen? You may become a citizen of Australia in one of three possible ways. These are: By birth: In Australia people automatically become an Australian citizen if they are born here and one or both of their parents is an Australian citizen or permanent resident of Australia. By descent: If you are the child of an Australian citizen but you are born overseas you will generally be granted Australian citizenship. There are a number of rules that might apply to people in this category. These are indicated in the Australian Citizenship Act, 2007. By grant: If you are a non-citizen of Australia you can apply to become an Australian citizen. You must meet several requirements, which generally are that you: Are an Australian permanent resident Are over 16 years of age Have lived in Australia as a lawful resident for a total of four years where absences of a cumulative duration of less than 12 months will not matter, including 12 months as a permanent resident immediately preceding the date of application where absences of a cumulative duration of less than 3 months during this period will not matter Are of good character Have a knowledge of basic English Have an adequate knowledge of your responsibilities and privileges as a citizen Are likely to reside in, or to maintain a close and continuing association with, Australia if granted citizenship" Seeing as Tai moved back to the UK at 15 to takeup a Speedway career, perhaps you can tell me which part he qualifies under? Plus he was born in the UK to British parents. Even if they became Austrlian citizens he would not have the right by birth as far as I can see. If he has Australian citizenship then it doesn't fit in with what I have read on it. (Edit - just realised you may have been referring to Jason Crump - in which case it's as SCB says. Jason has a case for British nationality, but, as far as I can tell, Tai doesn't have one for Australian nationality)

Actually he's not an Aussie. He has no claim on being Australian. British parents. Born in Britain. Never lived in Australia long enough to qualify for citizenship. Maybe he has a strong connection with the country, and grew up singing their national anthem in school - but he ain't an Aussie. Jason Crump is more British than Tai is Australian.

That's not cheating. It's a tactic, and not a particularly good one either. If he instructed 2 riders to throw a race they could have lost out on a 5-1. So even if they gained 3 from the tactical, they potentially lost 8 points from a 5-1 to a 1-5 by throwing the race, so they would have lost out.

Absolutely. A complete rip off of the fans, which was a much more common occurance back in the 'heat 6' days.

Golden Helmet. Carl Blackbird beat Hans Nielsen. I remember that. I was there!