Philip Addison 0 Posted October 13, 2007 Absoloutly no doubt whatsoever Nicholls blatently stuck Bomber in the fence, he even looked at him before he done it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Correct. Snidey move from a snidey bloke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
speedwayKid 0 Posted October 13, 2007 (edited) Scotty has been Jealous of Harris ever since Harris won the Cardiff GP, Scotty has had 2 years in GP's? and has never won a GP. Harris comes in and wins a GP and at Cardiff you could see Scotty didn't like it. Should off been EX but hey i'm not the ref. Edited October 13, 2007 by speedwayKid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Philip Addison 0 Posted October 13, 2007 (edited) You could see in Scott's eyes that he didn't like having the limelight taken away from him... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Limelight for WHAT ? The blonde pit person ??? He's nothing but a choker. Edited October 13, 2007 by Philip Addison Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aries 440 Posted October 13, 2007 Im sure hes not LW But what changes , he seems to have major problems whenever any of his team member becomes more popular than him , as we know from his time at Ipswich. Terrible decision BTW , should have been awarded , Holta , Harris , Nicholls <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Too true Boxer. Thought he was the big cheese at Foxhall and got pi$$ed off when the fans votes Hans rider of the year and took him to their hearts I do still like Scott as a rider though, great to watch and damn good despite what some will say. Very naughty tonight though i must admit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
back straight bee 0 Posted October 13, 2007 (edited) fact scott should have been excluded.the referee chose to ignore it.but hey stop sticking the knife into scott it was pure racing nothing malicious.felt really sorry for bomber.a wildcard is a cert and this incident will make bomber more determined next year. did you notice scott coming out of bombers pits after the race.good luck scott and bomber.the important thing is that they will both be in 2008 series. Edited October 13, 2007 by back straight bee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Don'sfreelancerider 2 Posted October 13, 2007 Scotty should of been out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tricky dicky 19 Posted October 13, 2007 Correct. Snidey move from a snidey bloke. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Says he from behind his keyboard !! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
colincooke 0 Posted October 13, 2007 You've gotta get out more... Ref could've called it either way, Scott did what he felt he had to and got away with it. That's speedway racing...ask Gollob, ask Nicki etc <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Absolutely Steve.This isn't team riding it's an individual(though at times you wonder ).A racing incident & that's all,pity for Bomber but hey he'll be in again next year better & stronger.If anything Scott taught him a lesson in how you need to be when the chips are down & Chris will learn from it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ILoveAJ 0 Posted October 13, 2007 Absolutely Steve.This isn't team riding it's an individual(though at times you wonder ).A racing incident & that's all,pity for Bomber but hey he'll be in again next year better & stronger.If anything Scott taught him a lesson in how you need to be when the chips are down & Chris will learn from it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ya when the chips are down just stuff him in the fence..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
colincooke 0 Posted October 13, 2007 I feel for poor old Subedei...finally Nicholls has qualified by right, however controversially. No more 'beggar' quotes - will that title transfer to Bomber now? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No Rabs that's now Jarek's new nickname Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Subedei 0 Posted October 13, 2007 What I don't "get" about the whole race-off situation is why Sky believed Harris should have first choice. They kept saying he'd been better than the other two. But, if he had, he wouldn't have been in the race-off, would he? They all scored 91 points, so how the hell did Harris have a better season than the other two? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Subedei 0 Posted October 13, 2007 No Rabs that's now Jarek's new nickname <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Or Chris Harris'. I don't think Hampel deserves a nomination - he's had chances before and not produced the goods. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Philip Addison 0 Posted October 13, 2007 (edited) Says he from behind his keyboard !! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well i dont HIDE BEHIND A FALSE NAME LIKE TRICKY DICKY HA HA HA HA I give my opinions and if you don't like em, tough for you pal. Edited October 13, 2007 by Philip Addison Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
London Witch 57 Posted October 13, 2007 Im sure hes not LW But what changes , he seems to have major problems whenever any of his team member becomes more popular than him , as we know from his time at Ipswich. Terrible decision BTW , should have been awarded , Holta , Harris , Nicholls <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Tut-tut Boxer, time to move on! I watched the race as a bit of a neutral. None of the three are particular favourites of mine but I would have liked the Brits to go through. So in my opinion with no bias, I thought Scott was very harsh and lucky not to be excluded. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fatface 2,554 Posted October 13, 2007 We can only assume you know Scott Nicholls well to make those sort of observations. I assume you do Phillip? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites