Yearbyred 1,104 Posted May 6, 2014 Hall been released by the Bears after his suspension - Konopka keeps his place. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ch958 2,395 Posted May 6, 2014 brave move - its a gamble and i hope it pays off i think it will Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
screm 8,057 Posted May 6, 2014 brave move - its a gamble and i hope it pays off i think it will Brave move possibly but Redcar will gain a new asset out of it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yearbyred 1,104 Posted May 6, 2014 Brave move possibly but Redcar will gain a new asset out of it. I think that is definitely the plus point - might have to suffer a few defeats in the short term particularly away (but then Hall wasn't potentially a great scorer away anyway). Also leaves the door open for further changes when Rafa gets his true average? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigeddiechek 1,094 Posted May 6, 2014 Brave move possibly but Redcar will gain a new asset out of it. Quite a profound statement! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hulvik 73 Posted May 6, 2014 Pitty It's taken the Redcar promotion so long to do it should have done it straight away Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
screm 8,057 Posted May 6, 2014 Quite a profound statement! I live life by profoundness. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dekker 239 Posted May 6, 2014 Pitty It's taken the Redcar promotion so long to do it should have done it straight away Why Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RedcarRacer 228 Posted May 6, 2014 Thumbs up to the management, keeping Konopka will hopefully benefit the club long term. Pleased Hall isn't coming in. Pressure on others now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hulvik 73 Posted May 6, 2014 Why[/quote I take it you think Hall's actions in kicking an injured rider as he lay on the track are acceptable then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dekker 239 Posted May 6, 2014 Nope and he was rightly banned for it, but that what the disciplinary process is for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
screm 8,057 Posted May 6, 2014 Hall has now done his ban, I wonder if there`s a track out there looking for a new signing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hulvik 73 Posted May 6, 2014 Had josh been able to defend himself I'd agree the 28 day ban would have been enough and if josh had retaliated he should have been published as well. But if I'd acted in the same way as Hall did at my place of work I know what would have happened to me and I suspect that's the same for most people so just because Hall is a sportman he should be treated differently Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
havenagotahope 204 Posted May 6, 2014 Had josh been able to defend himself I'd agree the 28 day ban would have been enough and if josh had retaliated he should have been published as well. But if I'd acted in the same way as Hall did at my place of work I know what would have happened to me and I suspect that's the same for most people so just because Hall is a sportman he should be treated differently Was it a work of note he had "published" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boro Bare 18 Posted May 6, 2014 I suspect you're right Hulvik, you'd most likely have got sacked in the same circumstances. I also suspect though that if the colleague you kicked had recklessly knocked you off your motorbike in the car park injuring you and writing off your bike in the process he'd have got into trouble as well. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
