noaksey
-
Content count
970 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Posts posted by noaksey
-
-
3 hours ago, Wolfie456 said:Any meeting from during the season
Many people won't keep them though I haven't got any of my previous ones why would you?
It'll be interesting to see if they allow tickets from the Olympique to count
-
2 hours ago, Wolfie456 said:But strong rumour Brummies moving upto premiership on a Monday using the bulk of this years wolves team and possibly Pete Adams as manager.
I wish them well with that, how on earth given the previous difficulties at Birmingham do they think that this would be a good idea
As for Uncle Pete I think it's time he put his feet up
-
46 minutes ago, bellevueace said:One question could there be any possibility of Wolves running at Birmingham in the short term whilst looking for a site to develop?
I believe Birmingham can only stage 1 meeting per week and Wednesday has been pencilled in for greyhounds next year so that leaves Brummies looking for a new race night if they can continue at PB at all
-
1
-
-
18 minutes ago, arnieg said:Three weeks since the Plymouth two were fingered, shouldn't there be a hearing date by now?
Morris's one was 5 weeks after the test I believe although that was delayed by agreement I believe
SShould be soon now
-
-
Another rule we'd never heard of until today
If he's got an established match average which he clearly has then why is it shown as assessed in the greensheet lists?
What does that achieve exactly?
-
2
-
-
Wolves have always said that CVS and Adams sit down and agree the team building, I presume in the event of a difference of opinion CVS has the casting vote
I believe the Poole teams have always been built by Matt Ford and Middlo just manages the team he's given, I think that's on record
-
Wolves need a very big lead from Monmore
The last time we went to Owlerton in the play offs without one 61-29
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, DazS said:very good question, they would do it in a car accident, finding a trace of anything would not prove they are under the influence of that substance,
Where would you draw the line? Plus you'd require the Independent testers to stay for the duration of each meeting just in case which clearly they'd want paying for
-
12 minutes ago, Rickyag said:I believe the roof etc are asbestos so I would think nobody would want to reuse but be removed and destroyed by specialists.
The rules surrounding demolition and planning permission are pretty complex, if there is asbestos or anything that could be considered unsafe then pp would be required
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Bojangles said:They don't, but you can probably get a good idea from the length of the ban. If it's not intentional and for something like painkillers, they'll probably just get something like an 8-month ban (like Ben Barker) and they'll be able to ride next season. If they end up getting a two-year ban, then you know it's more serious.
Yes fair comment
-
13 hours ago, Mike0310 said:Before we hang them both let’s just wait and see what the substances were. If it is drugs non prescription then they get what they deserve but we don’t no the mitigation yet.
They don't announce what the substances are, see Ben Barker SCB statements
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Fromafar said:The updates suggested he did finish the race.
He did finish but in last place, the other 3 riders passed him before the finish line
-
3
-
-
37 minutes ago, one of clubs said:Should BV make the grand final would the home leg be on thursday 2nd oct, weather permitting?
Monday 2nd
Thursday 5th are the final dates
-
1 hour ago, Call me wolfie said:Im pretty sure Pete will be looking forward to a year off, he’s not getting any younger. Chris Adams may be interested though.
Rosco is your man if you want a new team manager
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Crump99 said:Whilst still running you have to nice to AEPG, even at this late stage.
Yes it's the same at Wolves
-
1 hour ago, LesR said:So the red light came on after they lapped Douglas?
The opposite
-
12 minutes ago, 4thbender said:I'm afraid he was...on the fourth bend both leading riders passed the coasting Douglas before they had had time to respond to the red light. Douglas had clearly retired from the race and should no way have been allowed into the rerun.
Before they had time to respond to the red light isn't when the red light comes on
-
2 hours ago, RideHard said:Bit different coasting round last lap to get over line for a point, compared to been lapped with over a lap to go
He wasn't lapped.
-
So everytime a rider coasts around they should be excluded?
-
15 minutes ago, SPEEDY69 said:I thought Morris refused the test full stop, which means it's treated the same as a positive one.
See I valve's post on page 3
-
1
-
-
-
1 minute ago, Bald Bloke said:There used to have to be a track doctor at every meeting. I don't know if there still is. Or maybe the home club pays for one for 2 hours a meeting to do/ over see the tests the tests. I dunno, like i say i ain't got a clue about drug testing.
Anti doping is carried out by a 3rd party agency, you don't get the track Doctor or Neil Vatcher with a chemistry kit that's why it's expensive
-
2
-
-
10 minutes ago, Bald Bloke said:This type of test is so cheap every rider could take one. It says it's 99% accurate, and tests for 10 drugs. The lab fee could be paid by the ride via a fine if proved guilty in the lab test. Before i get shot down, i don't know anything about drug testing, but are these much different from the pee test ones they use at meetings?
Professional workplace nhs DRUG TESTING KITS 7, 10 & 11 DRUG TEST CUP KITS | eBay
So someone from the testing agency has to be at every single meeting staged, then how do you ensure that 14 riders do their sample without outside influence/tampering? Presumably they need to be held in a zone until all tests are completed etc given speedways facilities I'd imagine that's going to be very difficult.
Wolves 2023
in SGB Premiership Speedway League
Posted
That doesn't mean that they are prepared for the speedway to continue though.