billy

well you got your wish.olly out of mildenhall with his awkward style. dumped by mldenhall. makes you wonder if its worth all the effort? as you can tell i am ollies father so i find your criticism a bit much.

rayson is no longer an ipswich asset or a mildenhall asset not his choice believe me!

not knocking you or your mechanical knowledge so dont take it personally just like to reiterate. why should something as simple as a silencer( and bear in mind the old style king will fit onto any engine without problems) have to make a rider alter all his engine setups? it should be bolt on and go.simple. theyre restricting the exhaust gases way too much and thats not right for a racing engine and i dont care what anybody says you cant argue with that

another thing to. i havent heard one rider or tuner praising the benefits of these silencers. in fact the opposite they all say the bikes are down on power and hard to ride in the deep dirt. its only the non technical minded or non riding fraternity who say theyre o.k. the riders should be the ones who decide end of.

im entitled to my opinion and im not alone in it. there are far noiser sports than speedway . the silencers are killing the bikes.theyre not right and its proven because the old ones work fine. they should be binned asap. speedway is expensive enough as it is without these silencers.its all very well saying what if a track is forced to close but these new silencers wont satisfy the nimbys and whingers and no track as of yet has closed.

so wtf are they being used? looks like an expensive year for some riders and a profitable one for engine tuners. back to my question. national league exempt? yes or no?

is it definate that national league are exempt? yes or no

well thats all very well saying "bu..er the track" but the reality is it needs someone to get it into shape and make it safe for the riders. its not whinging its fact and although we should be pleased to see racing again which i for one am this track curator buisness is not going to dissapear in a cloud of dust.whoever is going to do it will i hope be revealed on sat. night and please not d. coventry or p. thorogood. still dont understand if the judge has not made his judgement how its still all systems go, or could it change god forbid.

yes it is important who is doing "the flipping track" because for one thig riders safety is paramount and if that track is not done right its"flipping dangerous" and also i dont stand on the terraces so i can see first hand all the debris from the stocks that usally run the night before and the ruddy great holes that appear if water is not got into the base early in the day. it needs a top bloke to prepare that track and not a plough jockey who hasnt got a clue. bring back huggy

why cant we be told who is doing the track without all these stupid and childish remarks?

which is what?

is this definate?atm heard nothing from bspa to confirm for sure either in writing or via the internet and nothing from n.vatcher who sent us a txt to say " hold on because theres a debate going on about these silencers"

but i suppose they were so to speak at the time the meeting was held.still like to know how many votes were cast and how many for and against.thats a democratic vote isnt it? oh forgot were talking about the bspa

if thats true and excuse my ignorance then thats 4 clubs out of 8? thats not a majority vote is it? or am i missing something here? and its not lack of brain cells.

so. how many votes went against mildenhall? all 8 clubs? or was it so close that peter morrish had to cast his vote as well? he still hasnt explained why it was secret. who voted against mildenhall then? i think we should know who kicked this club while it was down and see who its real friends are .